Publication:
比較健全與智能障礙桌球選手認知功能與專項桌球測驗能力

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisor吳昇光
dc.contributor.advisorWu, Sheng-Guang
dc.creator張耀駿
dc.creatorChang, Yao-Chun
dc.date2014
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-27T13:35:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-30T15:38:31Z
dc.date.available2017-02-27T13:35:45Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-27T13:35:45Z
dc.description學位類別：碩士
dc.description校院名稱：國立臺灣體育運動大學
dc.description系所名稱：競技運動學系碩士班
dc.description學號：19904018
dc.description畢業學年度：102年
dc.description論文頁數：105頁
dc.description.abstract　　背景與目的：過去已有許多研究發現智能障礙者因為智力的因素，導致在認知能力上表現出較差的結果，但卻鮮少提到受過專業訓練後的智能障礙選手其認知功能表現。同時也僅有兩篇文章顯示出智能障礙桌球選手在接發球與桌球基本技術也明顯不如健全桌球選手，但此兩篇研究著重在單項技術上的探討，而桌球是一開放式交互的運動，在大部分的得失分中皆包含發球、接發球與來回球；因此，本篇將使用較全面的專項桌球測驗（table tennis specific test）及整體性的認知功能評估工具，比較優秀健全桌球選手、業餘健全桌球選手與國際智能障礙桌球選手在此兩能力上之差異，並進一步分析桌球運動與認知能力之間的相關性。方法：23位優秀健全桌球選手、22位業餘健全桌球選手以及29位由國際資深分級師確認無誤之國際智能障礙桌球選手，分別進行觸碰式螢幕認知測驗（Generic Touch Screen Cognitive Test Battery）以及魏式縮減版智力量表（Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence）測量三組選手的認知能力，以及專項桌球測驗評估選手之桌球技術。結果：優秀健全桌球選手與業餘健全桌球選手在各分項認知測驗中表現都明顯優於國際智能障礙桌球選手（p <.01），唯獨在積木設計面向，業餘健全桌球選手明顯優於優秀健全桌球選手，而優秀健全桌球選手又明顯優於國際智能障礙桌球選手。在專項桌球測驗方面，發球、基本桌球技巧和控制以及專項桌球測驗總分中，優秀健全組皆明顯優於業餘健全組和國際智能障礙組（p <.01）；不同的是在接發球面向，則是優秀健全組和國際智能障礙組明顯優於業餘健全組（p <.001）。結論：國際智能障礙桌球選手即便經過專業的運動訓練，先天的智力損傷依然會影響其認知功能，但桌球技術仍然可以藉由後天訓練達到相當於業餘健全桌球選手的層級。不過，由於桌球運動包含諸多的運動智力因素，如果在認知能力有損傷的情況下，若想達到優秀健全桌球選手的水平是較困難的。
dc.description.abstract　　Background & Purpose: A lot of studies have found that people with intellectual disability (ID) showed lower cognitive performance, but only few studies indicated the performance of cognitive function in athletes with ID who received specialized training. To the best of our knowledge, only two studies showed that the performance of the table tennis (TT) players with ID on return service and TT basic skills are significantly worse than the elite TT players with able-bodied. In these two studies, they only focused on single skill, but table tennis is an interactive sport that includes service, return service and rally. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to use the comprehensive TT specific test and the extensive tool which evaluate cognitive function to compare cognitive function and TT skills in the elite TT players, the amateur TT players and the international TT players with ID, and further to analyze the correlation between TT skills and cognitive function. Method: There were 23 elite TT players, 22 amateur TT players and 29 international TT players with ID who were identified by senior classifiers. The Generic Touch Screen Cognitive Test Battery and Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence were used to evaluate cognitive function in three groups, and also the TT specific test (service, return service and basic table tennis skills and control) was conducted to measure TT skills in each player. Results: The results showed that the elite TT players and the amateur TT players performed significantly better than the international TT players with ID in every cognitive aspect (p <.01) except Block Design. In the Block Design, the amateur TT players performed much better than the elite TT players, and the elite TT players performed significantly better than the international TT players with ID. In the TT specific test, the elite TT players showed significantly higher scores than the amateur TT players and the international TT players with ID in service, basic TT skills and control and total testing score (p <.01). However, the elite TT players and the international TT players with ID got significantly higher scores than the amateur TT players in return service (p <.001). Conclusion: Due to impairment of inborn intelligence, the cognitive function of the international TT players with ID ware effected even through professional sport training. However, the TT skills of the international TT players with ID can reach the level of the amateur TT players through training. Due to the TT includes a lot of sport intelligence, the international TT players with ID who have cognitive impairment are hard to reach the level of the elite TT players.
dc.description.tableofcontents目　次 第壹章　緒論 　第一節　研究背景與動機………………………………………………………………1 　第二節　研究目的…………………………………………………………………………4 　第三節　研究問題…………………………………………………………………………5 　第四節　研究假設…………………………………………………………………………5 　第五節　研究範圍與限制………………………………………………………………5 　第六節　名詞解釋…………………………………………………………………………7 第貳章　文獻探討 　第一節　智能障礙之定義與其動作能力相關特性……………………………9 　　一、智能障礙之定義…………………………………………………………………9 　　二、智能障礙者之動作能力相關特性…………………………………………13 　第二節　認知測驗項目之探討………………………………………………………17 　　一、簡單反應時間與複雜反應時間相關文獻探討…………………………17 　　二、簡單視覺搜尋與複雜視覺搜尋相關文獻探討…………………………19 　　三、Corsi記憶測驗相關文獻探討………………………………………………22 　　四、倫敦塔相關文獻探討……………………………………………………………23 　　五、積木設計相關文獻探討…………………………………………………………24 　　六、矩陣推理相關文獻探討…………………………………………………………25 　第三節　總結…………………………………………………………………………………27 第參章　研究方法與步驟 　第一節　研究架構…………………………………………………………………………28 　第二節　研究對象…………………………………………………………………………29 　第三節　研究對象徵招流程……………………………………………………………31 　第四節　研究流程…………………………………………………………………………32 　第五節　研究工具…………………………………………………………………………33 一、GCTB與WASI測驗…………………………………………………………………33 　二、專項桌球測驗…………………………………………………………………………46 　第六節　資料處理與分析………………………………………………………………58 第肆章 研究結果 　第一節　基本運動訓練資料差異……………………………………………………60 　第二節　認知能力比較…………………………………………………………………62 　第三節　專項桌球測驗比較……………………………………………………………63 　第四節　認知能力與專項桌球測驗之相關性……………………………………69 第伍章 討論 　第一節　三組桌球選手之認知功能現……………………………………………71 　　一、反應時間……………………………………………………………………………71 　　二、視覺搜尋……………………………………………………………………………72 　　三、Corsi記憶測驗……………………………………………………………………74 　　四、倫敦塔………………………………………………………………………………75 　　五、積木設計……………………………………………………………………………76 　　六、邏輯推理……………………………………………………………………………78 　第二節　三組桌球選手之專項桌球測驗表現……………………………………81 　　一、發球……………………………………………………………………………………81 　　二、接發球…………………………………………………………………………………83 　　三、基本技巧和控制…………………………………………………………………85 　　四、專項桌球測驗總分………………………………………………………………87 　第三節　認知能力與專項桌球測驗之相關性……………………………………89 第陸章　結論與建議 　第一節　結論…………………………………………………………………………………91 　第二節　建議與未來研究方向…………………………………………………………92 參考文獻……………………………………………………………………………………………93
dc.format.extent2099704 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ntus.edu.tw/handle/987654321/71360
dc.languagezh-TW
dc.publisher競技運動學系碩士班
dc.relation.isbasedon宋岱芬（2009）。優秀桌球兒童之視覺訊息處理能力。未出版碩士論文，國立臺灣體育運動大學，台中市。 吳昇光（2013）。最新身心障礙運動分級。台北市：合記。 林美珍（1996）。兒童認知發展。台北市：心理出版社。 林清和（1996）。運動學習程式學。台北市：文史哲出版社。 林耀豐（1996）。影響反應時間因素之探討及應用。中華體育季刊，10（1），113-121。 林淑親、林耀豐（2007）。影響反應時間因素之探討。中華體育季刊，21（3），103-117。 洪聰敏、豐東洋（2003）。運動員與非運動員訊息處理之研究。體育學報，35，117-126。 洪聰敏、羅麗娟、豐東洋、張育愷、高竟峰、洪巧菱、張弓弘、陳堅錐、張鼎乾（2001）。桌球運動員與非運動員在前動作時間、動作時間及反應時間之比較。台灣運動心理學報，1，81-97。 馬山坡（2010）。乒乓球運動員擊球落點預測能力分析。湖北體育科技，29（2），195-196。 張春興（1991）。心理學。臺北市：東華出版社。 陳學志、邱發忠、劉政宏、林宜利、陳萩卿、林奕宏、陳淑蓉（譯）（2004）。認知心理學。台北市：學富文化事業有限公司。（Mark H. Ashceaft，2001） 張力為、陶志翔（1994）。中國乒乓球運動員致力發展水平的研究。中國體育科學學會學報，14（6），73-78。 黃瑞祥、何金山、呂信漢、詹元碩（2012）。桌球運動員與非運動員視覺搜尋能力之比較。大專體育學刊，14（2），219-228。 劉奕濤（1996）。乒乓球運動員的智力研究。體育學刊，1，113-115。 韓承靜、蔡介立（2008）。眼球軌跡記錄-科學學習研究的明日之星。科學教育月刊，310，2-11。 韓承靜、洪蘭、蔡介立（2008）。心、眼與世界的連結-從認知神經科學看知覺與心像的關係。科學教育月刊，308，16-23。 謝國棟（2002）。評價運動員的智力及智力測驗問題。廣州體育學院學報，22（2），49-51。 蘇建文、林美珍、程小危、林惠雅、幸曼玲、陳李綢、吳敏而、柯華葳、陳淑美（1998）。發展心理學。台北：心理。 AAIDD. (2012). FAQ on Intellectual Disability. Retrieved November 15, 2012 from AAIDD Web:http://www.aaidd.org/content_104.cfm Alloway, T. P. (2010). Working memory and executive function profiles of individuals with borderline intellectual functioning. Journal on Intellectual Disability Research, 54(5), 448-456. Bonifacci, P. (2004). Children with low motor ability have lower visual-motor integration ability but unaffected perceptual skills. Human Movement Science, 23, 157-168. Carmeli, E., Bar-Yossef, T., Ariav, C., Levy, R., & Liebermann, D. G. (2008). Perceptual-motor coordination in persons with mild intellectual disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30(5), 323-329. Carlin, M., Chrysler, C., & Sullivan, K. (2007). Conjunctive visual search in individuals with and without mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 112(1), 54-65. Corsi-Cabrera, M., & Gutierrez, L. (1991). Spatial ability in classic dancers and their perceptual style. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 399-402. Conway, A. R., Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(12), 547-552. Carlin, M. T., Soraci, S. A., Dennis, N. A., Strawbridge, C. & Chechile, N. A. (2002). Guided visual search in individuals with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 107(4), 237-251. Di Blasi, F. D., Elia, F., Buono, S., Ramakers, G. J. A., & Di Nuovo, S. F. (2007). Relationships between visual-motor and cognitive abilities in intellectual disabilities. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104, 763-772. Ellis, N. R. (1978). Do the mentally retarded have poor memory? Intelligence, 2, 41-54. Goodey, C. F. (2005). Blockheads, roundheads, pointed heads: Intellectual disability and the brain before modern medicine. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 41, 165–183. Hartman, E., Houwen, S., Scherder, E., & Visscher. (2010). On the relationship between motor performance and executive functioning in children with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54(5), 468-477. Hambrick, D. Z., Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2005). The role of working memory in higher-level cognition: Domain-specific versus domain-general perspectives. In R. Sternberg & J. E. Pretz (Eds.), Cognition and intelligence: Identifying the mechanisms of the mind (pp. 104−121). New York: Cambridge University Press. International Table Tennis Federation. (2011). Table tennis classification system for players with intellectual disabilities- Final edition. Lausanne, Switzerland: The Author. Jenni, O. G., Chaouch, A., Caflisch, J., & Rousson, V. (2013). Correlations between motor and intellectual functions in normally developing children between 7 and 18 years. Developmental Neuropsychology, 38(2), 98-113. Jensen, A. R., & Munro, E. (1979). Reaction time, movement time, and intelligence. Intelligence, 3, 121-126. Jafarzadehpur, E., & Yarigholi, M. R. (2004). Comparison of visual acuity in reduced lamination and facility of ocular accommodation in table tennis champions and non-players. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 3, 44-48. Kosh, S. C. (1920). The block-design tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3(5), 357-376. Kerremans, J., Geeraerts, M., Van Biesen, D., & Vanlandewijck, Y. (2011). Classification manual: Part 1- Generic cognitive test. Leuven University, Belgium. Kasahara, S., Mashiko, H., & Niwa, S. I. (2008). Superior performance in WAIS-R block design among top-level rugby players. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 42, 932-933. Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment. (3rd ed.) New York: Oxford University. Lopez, O. G., & Postigo, S. B. (2012). Relationship between physical prowess and cognitive function. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 29-34. Luckasson, R., & Reeve, A. (2001). Naming, defining, and classifying in mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 39, 47–52. Masson, J. D., Dagnan, D., & Evans, J. (2010). Adaptation and validation of the Tower of London test of planning and problem solving in people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54(5), 457-467. Nelson, R. E., Dickson, A. L., & Banos, J. H. (2000). An automated administration of Corsi’s Block-tapping Test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91(2), 578-580. Ryan, J. J., Carruthers, C. A., Miller, L. J., Souheaver, G. T., Gontkovsky, S. T., & Zehr, M. D. (2005). The WASI matrix reasoning subtest: Performance in traumatic brain injury, stroke, and dementia. International Journal of Neuroscience, 115(1), 129-136. Riccio, C. A., Sullivan, J. R., & French, C. (2002). The tower tasks: Measures of executive function?. Unpublished manuscript. Riccio, C. A., Wolfe, M. E., Romine, C., Davis, B., & Sullivan, J. R. (2004). The Tower of London and neuropsychological assessment of ADHD in adults. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 661-671. Schalock, R. L., Luckasson, R. A., & Shogren, K. A. (2007). The renaming of mental retardation: Understanding the change to the term intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 45(2), 116-124. Soderqvist, S., Nutley, S. B., Ottersen, J., Grill, K. M., & Klingberg, T. (2012). Computerized training of non-verbal reasoning and working memory in children with intellectual disability. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1-8. Spek, A. A., Scholte, E. M., & Van Berckelaer-Onnes, I. A. (2008). Brief report: The use of WAIS-III in adults with HFA and Asperger Syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 782-787. Smirni, P., Villardita, C., & Zappala, G. (1983). Influence of different paths on spatial memory performance in the block-tapping test. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 5, 355-359. Savelsbergh, G. J., Williams, A. M., Van der Kamp, J., & Ward, P. (2002). Visual search, anticipation and expertise in soccer goalkeepers. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20, 279-287. Van Biesen, D., Mactavish, J., Pattyn, N., & Vanlandewijck, Y. (2012). Technical proficiency among table tennis players with and without intellectual disabilities. Human Movements Science, 31, 1517-1528. Van Biesen, D., Verellen, J., Meyer, C., Mactavish, J., Van de Vliet, P., & Vanlandewijck, Y. (2010). The ability of elite table tennis players with intellectual disabilities to adapt their service/return. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 27, 242-257. Van der Molen, M. J., Van Luit, J. E. H., Jongmans, M. J., & Van der Molen, M. W. (2009). Memory profiles in children with mild intellectual disabilities: Strengths and weaknesses. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30(6), 1237-1247. Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. San Antonio, TX: Pearson. Wehmeyer, M. L., Buntinx, W. H., Lachapelle, Y., Luckasson, R. A., Schalock, R. L., & Verdugo, M. A. (2008). The intellectual disability construct and its relation to human functioning. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 46(4), 311-318. Welsh, M. C., Cicerello, A., Cuneo, K., & Brennan, M. (1995).Error and temporal patterns in Tower of Hanoi performance: Cognitive mechanisms and individual differences. Journal of General Psychology, 122, 69–81. Williams, A., Davids, K., Burwitz, L., & Williams, J. (1993). Cognitive knowledge and soccer performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 579-593. Williams, A. M., Davids, K., Burwitz, L., & Williams, J. G. (1994). Visual search strategies in experienced and inexperienced soccer players. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65(2), 127-135. Wu, S. K. (2011).Analysis of the table tennis specific test in classification for players with an intellectual disability. Unpublished manuscript, International Table Tennis Federation. Wu, S. K., Vecko, G., Vanlandewijck, Y., Van Biesen, D., Verspeelt, N., Stefak, J., & Burchell, A. (2011). Development of table tennis specific classification system for players with intellectual disabilities. Paper presented at the 5th VISTA conference, Bonn, Germany. Wu, S. K., Verspeelt, N., Burchell, A., Stefak, J., Song, T. F., & Chang, Y. C. (2013). Analysis of table tennis specific test for players with intellectual impairment. Paper presented at the 6th VISTA conference, Bonn, Germany.
dc.subject認知功能;智能障礙;專項桌球測驗;桌球選手
dc.subjectCognitive function;Intellectual disability;Table tennis specific test;Table tennis players
dc.title比較健全與智能障礙桌球選手認知功能與專項桌球測驗能力
dc.titleCOMPARISON OF COGNITIVE FUNCTION AND TABLE TENNIS SPECIFIC TEST BETWEEN TABLE TENNIS PLAYERS WITH ABLE-BODIED AND INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY
dc.typethesis
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
0035101.pdf
Size:
2 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

學位論文(103學年度之前)