Publication:
不同運動水準之女子籃球選手在教練-選手關係、教練領導行為、團隊凝聚力、內在動機與滿意度之研究

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisor聶喬齡
dc.contributor.advisorNien Chiao-Lin
dc.creator黃義翔
dc.creatorHuang, Yi-Hsiang
dc.date2011
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-27T07:18:47Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-30T15:30:25Z
dc.date.available2017-02-27T07:18:47Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-27T07:18:47Z
dc.description學位類別：碩士
dc.description校院名稱：國立台灣體育大學
dc.description系所名稱：體育研究所
dc.description學號：19801114
dc.description畢業學年度：99年
dc.description論文頁數：139頁
dc.description.abstract　　本研究的目的在於探討：一、不同背景變項的女子籃球選手在教練-選手關係、教練領導行為、團隊凝聚力、內在動機與滿意度的差異情形。二、教練-選手關係與教練領導行為對團隊凝聚力、內在動機與滿意度的預測情形。研究方法採問卷調查法，參與者為185位高中甲級與大專公開組第一級之女子籃球選手（高中組88名、大專組97名），平均年齡為18.81 ± 1.88歲。研究結果顯示：一、不同運動水準（組別）在教練-選手關係、教練領導行為、團隊凝聚力的差異，達顯著的統計考驗水準，內在動機及滿意度的差異，則未達統計考驗的顯著水準；二、教練領導行為能有效預測團隊凝聚力的四個層面（解釋變異量：團隊合作為25%、人際親和為21%、團隊適應為29%、人際吸引為20%）、內在動機（解釋變異量為9%）與滿意度（解釋變異量為48%）；三、教練領導行為能有效預測教練-選手關係的三個取向（解釋變異量：親密性為46%、承諾感為48%、互補性為47%）；四、教練-選手關係能有效預測團隊凝聚力（解釋變異量：團隊合作為18%、人際親和為20%、團隊適應為23%、人際吸引為19%）、內在動機（解釋變異量為7%）與滿意度（解釋變異量為45%）；五、教練-選手關係在教練領導行為對團隊凝聚力與滿意度間扮演部分的中介效果，對內在動機則具有完全的中介效果。根據研究結果，本研究提出實際應用上的建議與未來研究的建議，提供籃球運動訓練與未來研究之參考。
dc.description.abstract　　The purposes of this study were: (1) to investigate the difference between coach-athlete relationships, coach leadership behaviors, team cohesion, intrinsic motivation, and satisfaction among players with different background variables. (2) to examine the Prediction of women’s basketball players’ perceptions of coach-athlete relationships and coach leadership behaviors on team cohesion, intrinsic motivation, and satisfaction. Participants were 185 both division 1 high school and university women’s basketball players (high school: 88, university: 97). The average age was 18.81 ± 1.88 years old. The major findings were as follows: (1) There were significant differences on coach leadership behaviors, coach-athlete relationships, and team cohesion among different background variables (different level), but were not significant on intrinsic motivation, and satisfaction. (2) The coach leadership behaviors significantly predicted four orientations of team cohesion (GI-T: ΔR2 = .25; GI-S: ΔR2 = .21; ATG-T: ΔR2 = .29; AGT-S: ΔR2 = .20), intrinsic motivation (ΔR2 = .09), and satisfaction (ΔR2 = .48) effectively. (3) The coach leadership behaviors significantly predicted three orientations of coach-athlete relationships (closeness: ΔR2 = .46; commitment: ΔR2 = .48; complementarity: ΔR2 = .47). (4) The coach-athlete relationships significantly predicted four orientations of team cohesion (GI-T: ΔR2 = .18; GI-S: ΔR2 = .20; ATG-T: ΔR2 = .23; AGT-S: ΔR2 = .19), intrinsic motivation (ΔR2 = .07), and satisfaction (ΔR2 = .45). (5) The coach-athlete relationships played several partial and total mediation effects were witnessed between coaching leadership behaviors and team cohesion, intrinsic motivation, and satisfaction. Implications, applications, and future directions of this are also discussed.
dc.description.tableofcontents目　次 第一章　緒論……………………………………………………………1 　第一節　研究動機……………………………………………………2 　第二節　研究目的……………………………………………………6 　第三節　研究問題……………………………………………………7 　第四節　研究範圍與限制……………………………………………8 　第五節　名詞解釋……………………………………………………10 第二章　文獻探討………………………………………………………13 　第一節　教練領導行為理論與相關研究……………………………13 　第二節　教練-選手關係理論與相關研究……………………………21 　第三節　團隊凝聚力理論與相關研究………………………………33 　第四節　內在動機理論與相關研究…………………………………40 　第五節　滿意度理論與相關研究……………………………………43 　第六節　本章小結……………………………………………………47 　第七節　研究假設……………………………………………………49 第三章　研究方法………………………………………………………53 　第一節　研究架構……………………………………………………53 　第二節　研究對象……………………………………………………55 　第二節　研究對象……………………………………………………55 　第三節　研究工具……………………………………………………56 　第四節　實施程序……………………………………………………60 　第五節　資料處理……………………………………………………61 第四章　研究結果與討論………………………………………………63 　第一節　參與者之背景變項資料分析………………………………63 　第二節　各研究變項之描述性統計分析與討論……………………65 　第三節　不同背景變項在各研究變項的差異考驗分析與討論……69 　第四節　各研究變項之相關結果分析與討論………………………75 　第五節　多元階層迴歸預測分析與討論……………………………78 第五章　結論與建議……………………………………………………99 　第一節　結論…………………………………………………………100 　第二節　建議…………………………………………………………106 參考文獻…………………………………………………………………110 　中文部分………………………………………………………………110 　英文部分………………………………………………………………115
dc.format.extent645233 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ntus.edu.tw/handle/987654321/71056
dc.languagezh-TW
dc.publisher體育研究所
dc.relation.isbasedon中文部分 王加微（1980）。行為科學（初版）。台北：五南圖書。 王明月（2010）。桌球教練領導行為與組織氣氛、團隊凝聚力、運動滿意度之結構模式。大專體育學刊，12 (3)，53-64。 王俊明（2004）。教練工作價值觀對組織承諾、工作投入及工作滿意度的影響。台灣運動心理學報，5，59-86。 王耀聰（1997）。領導理論與運動教練領導行為的探討。中華體育季刊，10 (4)，12-20。 何正峰、鍾陳偉、倪雅華、王潔玲（2008）。不同性別籃球選手知覺教練領導行為、內在動機及滿足感之研究。北體學報，16，72-82。 吳明隆（2007）。SPSS統計應用實務（第二版）。台北市：文魁資訊。 吳國銑（2000）。我國大專院校運動教練行為比較研究。體育學報，28，59-68。 吳慧卿（2001）。選手知覺教練領導行為、團隊衝突、團隊凝聚力及滿意度關係之實證研究。未出版博士論文，國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。 李竹圍、石偉源、陳榮山、葉國輝（2006）。高中大學手球隊選手知覺教練領導行為比較之研究。北體學報，14，242-252。李炯煌（2002）。教練領導行為與教練-選手關係滿意度之相關研究。大專體育學刊，2，67-77。 李柳汶（2003）。大專甲組跆拳道教練領導行為之研究。體育學報，34，113-122。 李麗珍、陳淑滿（2005）。不同性別、獎學金等級選手知覺教練領導行為與內在動機之研究。台灣運動心理學報，6，55-69。 季力康（2009）。運動教練-選手關係與教練及選手的動機、滿意度與表現之相關研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（報告編號：NSC97-2410-H-003-135-SSS），未出版。 季力康、賴素鈴、陳美燕（1995）。大專網球選手運動目標取向與運動動機之相關研究。體育學報，20，1-12。 林季燕、季力康（2003）。運動動機量表之編製-信度與效度分析。台灣運動心理學報，2，15-32。 邱皓政（2006）。量化研究與統計分析-SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析（第三版）。台北市：五南圖書。 洪沛綺、郭癸賓、廖俊欽（2006）。足球教練領導行為之差異研究-以年度足協盃大學菁英賽為主。大漢學報，22，215-227。 涂志賢（1999）。運動教練領導風格與運動代表隊團隊文化關聯性之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立體育學院，桃園縣。 馬君萍（2003）。女子壘球選手知覺教練領導行為、知覺動機氣候、團隊凝聚力與內在動機之相關研究。運動教練科學，2，88-101。 張志青、吳忠政（2009）。亞洲四強男子排球選手-教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之研究。排球教練科學，13，57-65。 張家銘、徐欽賢、曾崑輝（2005）。曲棍球教練領導行為、選手的組織承諾與滿意度之研究。大專體育學刊，7 (1)，157-168。 許士軍（1990）。管理學。台北市：東華書局。 郭名娟（2010）。教練-選手關係對團隊凝聚力及滿意度預測之研究-以高中籃球 (HBL)為例。未出版碩士論文，國立體育大學，桃園縣。 陳玉娟（1995）。台灣地區游泳教練領導行為與選手成績表現及滿意度關係之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立台灣師範大學，台北市。 陳志榮、張碧峰（2008）。運動員對知覺教練領導行為與運動動機、滿足感及退出意圖之研究。興大體育學刊，9，55-66。 陳其昌（1993）。排球教練領導行為對團隊凝聚力的影響暨驗證運動情境領導理論之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立體育學院，桃園縣。 陳其昌、王俊明（2008）。大專院校女子排球選手知覺教練領導行為和運動目標取向對運動動機的影響。排球教練科學，12，27-39。 陳建彰、林伯化（2007）。甲組桌球選手知覺教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之研究。輔仁大學體育學刊，6，150-168。 陳鈺芳、高三福（2007）。教練領導行為一致性對運動員滿意度之影響-領導信任的中介效果。體育學報，40 (2)，51-62。 陳寶億、曹校章、林昌國（2007）。高中（職）橄欖球代表隊教練領導行為與球員團隊凝聚力之研究。輔仁大學體育學刊，6，87-100。 黃金柱（1990）。國家級運動教練領導行為調查研究。國立體育學院論叢，1 (2)，257-336。 黃惠芝（2008）。不同運動項目知覺教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之研究。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，7 (1)，146-156。 黃惠芝、黃朝嘉（2007）。優秀競技體操選手知覺教練領導行為與凝聚力之研究。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，6 (2)，46-54。 黃義翔、聶喬齡（審稿中）。教練-選手關係在領導行為和團隊凝聚力間的中介角色。審稿中。 楊志鴻、廖妤姵、黃娟娟（2010）。國中排球選手知覺教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之研究。排球教練科學，15，15-21。 楊純碧（1998）。教練領導行為對團隊氣氛與教練-選手關係滿意度之影響。未出版碩士論文，國立體育學院，桃園縣。 劉雅燕、鄭俊傑、洪敦賓（2006）。大學院校橄欖球隊教練領導行為與選手滿意度之研究。淡江體育，9，114-127。 劉衡江（1999）。再創我國大專籃球聯賽新紀元。大專體育，45，7-8。 歐正明（2006）。羽球教練領導行為與選手滿意度之研究-以大專院校甲組球員為例。運動休閒管理學報，3 (2)，167-189。 潘慧雯、蕭秋祺（2010）。大專院校籃球隊教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之相關研究。長榮大學學報，14 (1)，101-115。 蔣憶德、季力康（2006）。知覺與喜愛教練領導行為及運動動機氣候的一致性對內在動機及滿意度的預測。體育學報，39 (4)，85-102。 盧俊宏（1995）。運動心理學（第二版）。台北市：師大書苑。 盧俊宏、莊尚榮（2008）。利用Vallerand內外在動機階層模式促進運動動機。中華體育季刊，22 (4)，79-86。 盧俊宏、廖主民、季力康（譯）（2008）。運動社會心理學。台北市：師大書苑。(Jowett, S., & Lavallee, D., 2007) 賴世堤（2001）。高中（職）田徑教練領導行為之研究。體育學報，30，185-194。 賴世堤（2004）。我國各級排球教練領導行為之研究。排球教練科學，15，255-264。 簡瑞宇（2006）。大專網球選手知覺教練領導行為對運動參與動機及訓練滿意度之影響。台灣運動心理學報，8，65-86。 簡瑞宇、陳東韋（2006）。大專網球選手參與動機研究。福爾摩沙體育學刊，1，1-7。 簡曜輝、季力康、卓俊伶、洪聰敏、黃英哲、黃崇儒、廖主民、盧俊宏（譯）（2008）。競技與健身運動心理學。台灣運動心理學會。 (Weinberg, R. S., & Gould, D., 1999) 英文部分 Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), 1173-1182. Bass, B. A. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: The Free Press. Barrow, J. C. (1997). The variables of leadership: A review and conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 2, 231-251. Burke, M. (2001). Obeying until it hurts: Coach-athlete relationship. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 28, 227-240. Carron, A. V. (1982). Cohesiveness in sport group: Interpretations and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 123-138. Carron, A. V., & Chelladurai, P. (1981). The dynamics of group cohesion in sport. Journal of Sport Psychology, 3, 123-139. Carron, A. V., Brawley, L. R. & Widmeyer, W. N. (1998). The measurement of cohesiveness in sport group. In J. L. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 213-226). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology. Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The group environment questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244-266. Chemers, M. M. (1997). An integrative theory of leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Chelladurai, P. (1978). A contingency model of leadership in athletics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Waterloo, Canada. Chelladurai, P. (1984). Discrepancy between preferences and preferred leadership behavior and satisfaction of athletes in varying sports. Journal of Psychology, 6, 27-41. Chelladurai, P. (1993). Leadership. In R. N. Singer, M. Murphey, & L. K. Tennant (Eds.), Handbook on research in sport psychology (pp. 647-671). New York: MacMillan. Chelladurai, P., & Carron, A. V. (1978). Leadership. Ottawa: Candian Assocciation of Health, Physical Education and Recreation. Chelladurai, P., Haggerty, T. R., & Baxter, P. R. (1989). Decision style choices of university basketball coaches and players. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11, 201-215. Chelladurai, P., & Riemer, H. A. (1997). A classification of facet of athlete satisfaction. Journal of Sport Management, 11, 133-159. Chelladurai, P., & Riemer, H. A. (1998). Measurement of leadership in sports. In J. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 227-256). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology. Chelladurai, P., & Saleh, S. D. (1978). Preferred leadership in sports. Canadian Journal of Applied Sports Sciences, 3, 85-92. Chelladurai, P., & Saleh, S. D. (1980). Dimensions of leader behavior in sports: Development of a leadership scale. Journal of Psychology, 2, 34-45. Chi, L. K. (1993). Prediction of the achievement-related cognition and behaviors in the physical domain: A test of the theories of goal perspective and self-efficacy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Purdue, Indiana. Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum. Deci, E. L., Nezlek, & Sheinman, L. (1981). Characteristic of the rewarder and intrinsic motivation of the rewardee. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 1-10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum. Eys, M. A., Loughead, T. M., Bray, S. R., & Carron, A. V. (2009). Perceptions of cohesion by youth sport participants. The Sport Psychologist, 23, 330-345. Festinger, L., Schacter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informed groups: A study of housing project. New York: Harper & Row. Gould, D. (1982). Sport psychology in the 1980’s: Status direction and challenge in education in youth sports research. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 203-218. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (3th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1977). Management of Organizational Behavior (3th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Iso-Ahola S. E. (1995). Intrapersonal and interpersonal factors in athletic performance. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sport, 5, 191-199. Jowett, S. (2002). The psychology of interpersonal relationship in sport: The coach-athlete relationships. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Exeter, UK. Jowett, S. (2005). On repairing and enhancing the coach-athlete relationship. In S. Jowett & M. Jones (Eds.), The Psychology of coaching (pp. 14-26). Leicester: British Psychological Society. Jowett, S. (2006). Interpersonal and structural features of greek coach-athlete dyad performing in individual sports. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 18, 69-81. Jowett, S. (2009). Validating coach-athlete relationship measures with the nomological network. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Sciences, 13, 34-51. Jowett, S., & Chaundy, V. (2004). An investigation into the impact of coach leadership and coach-athlete relationship on group cohesion.Group Dynamic: Theory, Research and Practice, 8 (4), 302-311. Jowett, S., & Cockerill, I. M. (2002). Incompatibility in the coach-athlete. In I. M. Cockerill (Ed.), Solutions in sport psychology (pp. 16-31). London: Thomson Learning. Jowett, S., & Cockerill, I. M. (2003). Olympic medalists’ perspective of the athlete-coach relationship. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14, 313-331. Jowett, S. & Don Carolis, G. (2003). The coach-athlete relationship and perceived satisfaction in team sport. In R. Stelter (Ed.), X1th European Congress of Sport Psychology Proceedings (pp. 83-84). Copenhagen, Denmark: Det Samfundsvidenskabelige Fakultets. Jowett, S., & Frost, T. (2007). Race/Ethnicity in the all-male coach-athlete relationship: Black footballers’ narratives. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 5 (3), 255-269. Jowett, S., & Meek, G. (2000). Coach-athlete relationships in married couples: An exploratory content analysis. The Sport Psychologist, 14, 157-175. Jowett, S., & Ntoumanis, N. (2003). The Greek Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q): Scale construction and validation. International Journal of Sport and ExercisePsychology, 34, 101-124. Jowett, S., & Ntoumanis, N. (2004). The Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q): Development and initial validation. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sport, 14, 245-257. Jowett, S., & Poczwardowski, A. (2007). Understanding the coach-athlete relational. In S. Jowett, & D. Lavallee (Eds.), Social psychology in sport. (pp 3-14). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Kelly, H. H. (1979). Personal relationships: Their structures and processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Lafreniere, M. K., Jowett, S., Vallerand, R. J., Donahue, E. G., & Lorimer, R. (2008). Passion in sport: On the quality of the coach-athlete relationship. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30, 541-560. Lafreniere, M. K., Jowett, S., Vallerand, R. J., & Carbonneau, N. (2010). Passion for coaching and the quality of the coach-athlete relationship: The mediating role of coaching behaviors. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 25, 1-9. LeUnes, A. D., & Nation, J. R. (1989). Sport psychology. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall. Lorimer, R., & Jowett, S. (2009). Empathic accuracy, meta-perspective, and satisfaction in the coach-athlete relationship. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 21 (2), 201-212. Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and cause of satisfaction. In M. D. Dunrette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297-1350). Chicago: Rand McNally. Martens, R., & Peterson, J. (1971). Group cohesiveness as a determinant of success and member satisfaction in team performance. International Review of Sport Sociology, 6, 49-61. Mageau, G. A., & Vallerand, R. J. (2003). The coach-athlete relationship: A motivational model. Journal of Sports Sciences, 21, 883-904. Olympiou, A., Jowett, S., & Duda, J. L. (2008). The psychological interface of the coach-created motivational climate and coach-athlete relationship. The Sport Psychologist, 22, 423-438. Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., Tuson, K. M., Briere, N. M., & Blais, M. R. (1995). Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sport: The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS). Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17, 35-53. Philippe, R. A. & Seiler R. (2006). Closeness, co-orientation and complementarity in coach-athlete relationship: What male swimmers say about their male coaches. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7, 125-142. Poczwardowski, A., Barott, J. E., & Jowett, S. (2006). Diversifying approaches to research on coach-athlete relationship. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7, 125-142. Vallerand, R. J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Intrinsic motivation in sport. In K. Pandolf (Ed.), Exercise and sport science reviews (pp. 389-425). New York: Macmillan. Vallerand, R. J., & Losier, G. F. (1999). An integrative analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport. Journal of Sport Psychology, 11, 142-169. Vallerand, R. J., & Ratelle, C. F. (2002). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A hierarchical model. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Hand book of self-determination research (pp. 37-64). New York: Academic Press. Schruijer, S. G. L., & Vansina, L. S. (2002). Leader, leadership, and leading: From individual characteristics to relating in context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 869-874. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and group productivity. New York: Academic. Stipek, D. J. (1993). Motivation to learn: From theory to practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Weiss, M. R., & Bredemeier, B. J. (1983). Developmental sport psychology: A theoretical perspective for studying children in sport. Journal of Sport Psychology, 5, 216-230. Weiss, M. R., & Friedrichs, W. D. (1986). The influence of leader behavior, coach attributes, and institutional variables on performance and satisfaction of collegiate basketball team. Journal of Sport Psychology, 8, 332-346. Weiss, M. R., & Fretwell S. D. (2005). The parent-coach-athlete relationship in youth sport: Cordial contentious or conundrum? Researly Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76 (3), 286-304. Westre, K. R. & Weiss, M. R. (1991).The relationship between perceived coaching behavior and group cohesion in high school football team. The Sport Psychologist, 5, 41-54. Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A., & Werner, J. M. (1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. The Academy of Management Review, 23 (3), 513-530. Williams, J. M., & Hacker, C. (1982). Causal relationship among cohesion, satisfaction, and performance in women’s intercollegiate field hockey teams. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 324-337. Yukl, D. G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 258-205. Yukl, D. G. (2002). Leadership in organizations (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
dc.subject教練-選手關係;教練領導行為;團隊凝聚力;內在動機;滿意度
dc.subjectcoach-athlete relationships;coach leadership behaviors;team cohesion;intrinsic motivation;satisfaction
dc.title不同運動水準之女子籃球選手在教練-選手關係、教練領導行為、團隊凝聚力、內在動機與滿意度之研究
dc.titleTHE PREDICTION OF COACH LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS AND COACH-ATHLETE RELATIONSHIPS ON TEAM COHESION, INTRINSIC MOTIVATION AND SATISFACTION IN DIFFERENT LEVEL WOMEN’S BASKETBALL ATHLETES
dc.typethesis
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
0004601.pdf
Size:
630.11 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

學位論文(103學年度之前)