Publication:

不同運動水準之女子籃球選手在教練-選手關係、教練領導行為、團隊凝聚力、內在動機與滿意度之研究

本研究的目的在於探討：一、不同背景變項的女子籃球選手在教練-選手關係、教練領導行為、團隊凝聚力、內在動機與滿意度的差異情形。二、教練-選手關係與教練領導行為對團隊凝聚力、內在動機與滿意度的預測情形。研究方法採問卷調查法，參與者為185位高中甲級與大專公開組第一級之女子籃球選手（高中組88名、大專組97名），平均年齡為18.81 ± 1.88歲。研究結果顯示：一、不同運動水準（組別）在教練-選手關係、教練領導行為、團隊凝聚力的差異，達顯著的統計考驗水準，內在動機及滿意度的差異，則未達統計考驗的顯著水準；二、教練領導行為能有效預測團隊凝聚力的四個層面（解釋變異量：團隊合作為25%、人際親和為21%、團隊適應為29%、人際吸引為20%）、內在動機（解釋變異量為9%）與滿意度（解釋變異量為48%）；三、教練領導行為能有效預測教練-選手關係的三個取向（解釋變異量：親密性為46%、承諾感為48%、互補性為47%）；四、教練-選手關係能有效預測團隊凝聚力（解釋變異量：團隊合作為18%、人際親和為20%、團隊適應為23%、人際吸引為19%）、內在動機（解釋變異量為7%）與滿意度（解釋變異量為45%）；五、教練-選手關係在教練領導行為對團隊凝聚力與滿意度間扮演部分的中介效果，對內在動機則具有完全的中介效果。根據研究結果，本研究提出實際應用上的建議與未來研究的建議，提供籃球運動訓練與未來研究之參考。

The purposes of this study were: (1) to investigate the difference between coach-athlete relationships, coach leadership behaviors, team cohesion, intrinsic motivation, and satisfaction among players with different background variables. (2) to examine the Prediction of women’s basketball players’ perceptions of coach-athlete relationships and coach leadership behaviors on team cohesion, intrinsic motivation, and satisfaction. Participants were 185 both division 1 high school and university women’s basketball players (high school: 88, university: 97). The average age was 18.81 ± 1.88 years old. The major findings were as follows: (1) There were significant differences on coach leadership behaviors, coach-athlete relationships, and team cohesion among different background variables (different level), but were not significant on intrinsic motivation, and satisfaction. (2) The coach leadership behaviors significantly predicted four orientations of team cohesion (GI-T: ΔR2 = .25; GI-S: ΔR2 = .21; ATG-T: ΔR2 = .29; AGT-S: ΔR2 = .20), intrinsic motivation (ΔR2 = .09), and satisfaction (ΔR2 = .48) effectively. (3) The coach leadership behaviors significantly predicted three orientations of coach-athlete relationships (closeness: ΔR2 = .46; commitment: ΔR2 = .48; complementarity: ΔR2 = .47). (4) The coach-athlete relationships significantly predicted four orientations of team cohesion (GI-T: ΔR2 = .18; GI-S: ΔR2 = .20; ATG-T: ΔR2 = .23; AGT-S: ΔR2 = .19), intrinsic motivation (ΔR2 = .07), and satisfaction (ΔR2 = .45). (5) The coach-athlete relationships played several partial and total mediation effects were witnessed between coaching leadership behaviors and team cohesion, intrinsic motivation, and satisfaction. Implications, applications, and future directions of this are also discussed.