Publication:

國民中學實施游泳教學現況、阻礙因素、學生游泳能力與學習滿意度之研究

本研究主要目的在瞭解台中縣國民中學游泳教學的現況並分析學校實施游泳教學阻礙因素、學生游泳能力及學習滿意度的情形，分析背景變項與四個變項的現況與差異。本研究先採用文獻分析法以瞭解游泳教學實施阻礙因素、學生游泳能力及學習滿意度的理論基礎，再加以問卷調查法填寫問卷，調查對象係以台中縣50所國民中學實施游泳教學的相關承辦人員及國民中學一、二、三年級各3個班級學生為母群體，有效樣本人數計4,621人。回收資料以統計套裝軟體SPSS 10.0執行，採用描述性統計、t考驗、單因子變異數及Scheffe事後比較等統計分析。經分析討論獲得以下結論：1.實施游泳教學學校僅剩11所，佔22%，比率偏低，高達87.95%的學生未能上游泳課程。2.負責體育行政工作者年齡45歲以下，佔86%，男性居多，10所學校委由合作之游泳池聘任的游泳教練擔任佔98%。3.僅有1所學校有游泳池佔2%，設備明顯不足。4.實施游泳教學阻礙因素中，以收費困難為最大阻礙因素，但比對實施與未實施的阻礙因素，對於學校實施游泳教學並無多大的影響，而在於學校願不願意配合執行。5.26.9%的學生到國中三年級止，不曾接觸過游泳運動，81.6%的家長不會主動要求學生去學游泳。6.具備游泳能力的學生為21.5%，而有游泳池實施游泳教學學生游泳能力為36.5%，有顯著提升。7.有、無游泳池及實施、未實施游泳教學對學生游泳能力有顯著差異。8.山線、屯區的學生在捷泳與蛙泳的游泳能力皆顯著高於海線學校的學生。9.在設備構面滿意度上，屯區高於山線地區高於海線地區的學生，在課程、教師、學習結果等三個構面滿意度上，屯區高於海線地區高於山線地區的學生，不同年級參與游泳課後，在設備、課程、教師、學習結果等四個構面滿意度上，海線地區等於屯區高於山線地區的學生。

The purposes of this study were to understand the current situation of junior high schools’ swimming teaching, and also to analyze the obstructive factors of implementation, the swimming ability of students and the learning satisfaction levels in Tai-Chung County, which was in order to understand the current situation and the difference of four variables. To accomplish these study purposes, the research was first to review the literature that was to build up the theory to understand the four variables. In addition, using questionnaires to investigate 50 junior high schools of students (there were 3 classes of each grade students participate in this research.) and staffs in Tai-Chung County as a parent sample, which was 4621 people. By using the 10.0 version of SPSS statistics program to analyze the investigation data. Descriptive statistics, T-test, One-way ANOVA and Scheffe methods was used to analyze the data and statistic results show as below: 1. there were only 11 schools remaining on the implementation of swimming teaching, which was 22% of the whole. That means that 87.95% students were not able to obtain the swimming curriculum.2. There were 86% of sports administrators whose ages were under 45 years old, and the majority of them were male. There were 10 out of 11 schools employed the swimming coach outside of school, which were 98% of the whole.3. Only one school has a swimming pool (account for 2% of the whole), obviously the equipments were insufficient.4. Although the factor of fee paying was the top list of the obstructive factors of swimming teaching implementation, this did not affect the implementation of swimming teaching in schools. The significant obstructive factor lies in the schools were willing to coordinate the implementation or not.5. There were 26.9% of students who could not swim during their three years of studying periods, also nearly 81.6% of parents did not actively encourage their children to learn swimming.6. The student who has swimming ability is 21.5%. The schools which have a swimming pool and also implement swimming teaching course have a remarkable improvement on swimming ability of student (45.02%). 7. There is a significant difference on students’ ability of swimming, wheather or not having a swimming pool and an implementation of swimming teaching.8. The mountain and village area students whose swimming ability on crawl and breastroke styles are higher than the sea area schools.9. Village area students’ statisfaction are higher than mountain area, but mountain area also higher than sea areas students on the aspect of the equipment construction. Village area students’ statisfaction are higher than sea area which is higher than mountain area on the three aspects of curriculum, teacher, and learning result. The different grade students participated in swimming class, sea area students are equal to village area students, but higher than the mountain area students on the four aspects of equipments, curriculum, teachers, learning result.