Publication:

海峽兩岸大學手球選手知覺教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之研究

本研究之主要目的，在瞭解海峽兩岸大學手球選手知覺教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力的關係；以參加93年七月臺灣大學海峽兩岸手球邀請賽之男女選手177人為對象，以「教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力量表」為研究工具進行研究，結果發現：

一、海峽兩岸大學手球教練領導行為整體而言在「訓練指導行為」、「關懷行為」、「民主行為」達顯著差異，在「獎勵行為」則未達顯著差異。團隊凝聚力方面，「團隊目標的達成」，「團隊人際關係」達顯著差異，「團隊合作默契」則未達顯著差異。

二、不同性別海峽兩岸的大學手球選手知覺教練領導行為在「獎勵行為」達顯著差異。團隊凝聚力方面，「團隊目標的達成」、「團隊合作默契」達顯著差異，「團隊人際關係」則未達顯著差異。

三、不同球齡海峽兩岸的大學手球選手知覺教練領導行為在「民主行為」達顯著差異，團隊凝聚力方面，皆未達顯著差異。

四、不同練習天數海峽兩岸的大學手球選手知覺教練領導行為在「民主行為」達顯著差異，團隊凝聚力各向度皆未達顯著差異。

五、海峽兩岸大學手球選手知覺教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力的關係，在各個構面上呈現顯著差異。

Abstract

The aim of this research is to further the understanding of the relationship between the coach leadership behavior perceptible by the athletes and team coherence in Taiwan and Mainland China. The subjects of the test are athletes who participated in Leagues Taiwan and Mainland China of the College Handball Games in July, 2004. Tools of research include "Scaled questionnaire for perceived coach leadership behavior and team coherence in Taiwan and Mainland China."

The results are:

1.For athletes from different regions, the perceived coach leadership behavior, concerning behavior, and democratic behavior both in Taiwan and Mainland China show significant variance in the variable. In team coherence, the relationship between members and the achievement of team goals show obvious variances for all college Handball athletes. Praising behaviors, and the cooperation of team do not have obvious differences.

2.Both in Taiwan and Mainland China, the perceived coach leadership behavior and team coherence for athletes with different sex of playing do not reach the level of significance, but the praising behavior shows variable differences. In team coherence, the relationship between members does not shows obvious variances for all college Handball athletes. The achievement of team goals and the cooperation of team have obvious differences.

3.Both in Taiwan and Mainland China, the perceived coach leadership behavior and team coherence for athletes with different number of years of playing do not reach the level of significance, but the democratic behavior shows variable differences.

4.Both athletes in Taiwan and Mainland China with different number of days of practicing do not show significant variance in perceived coach leadership behavior or in team coherence, but the democratic behavior shows variable differences.

5.Athletes in Taiwan and Mainland China show significant variance in all aspects of the relationship between perceived coach leadership behavior and team coherence.