Publication: 電視運動播報對觀眾暴力與樂趣知覺的影響
| dc.contributor.advisor | 廖主民 | |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Liao, Chu-Min | |
| dc.creator | 陳湘眉 | |
| dc.creator | Chen, Hsing-Mei | |
| dc.date | 2003 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-02-22T15:01:50Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-30T15:17:48Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-02-22T15:01:50Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017-02-22T15:01:50Z | |
| dc.description | 學位類別：碩士 | |
| dc.description | 校院名稱：國立臺灣體育學院 | |
| dc.description | 系所名稱：體育研究所 | |
| dc.description | 畢業學年度：91年 | |
| dc.description | 論文頁數：52頁 | |
| dc.description.abstract | 中文摘要 電視運動轉播時，播報員的播報若傾向於強調暴力內容，可能影響閱聽眾對於比賽的暴力及樂趣知覺。而這樣的影響可能與閱聽眾本身的性別及經驗有關。本研究以慎思可能性模式為基礎，檢驗播報內容、運動經驗及性別對閱聽眾的暴力及樂趣知覺的影響。以120位大學生為參與者，不同性別和有、無籃球訓練經驗各半，分別觀看配上不同播報內容的籃球比賽，一為強調某隊球員的敵意和暴力的播報，另一則為平實地描述比賽過程的中性播報。結果顯示在暴力知覺方面有顯著的隊別與播報以及隊別與性別的交互作用。閱聽眾對於比賽的暴力知覺會受到播報內容所影響，但與經驗無關。在樂趣知覺方面則只有播報與經驗的交互作用。有經驗的閱聽眾較能在強調暴力的播報中獲得樂趣，而無經驗者則覺得中性的播報較有趣。 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract The commentator’s commentary emphasizing high level of violence of the game in television sport may affect the audience’s perceived violence and enjoyment. This effect may be mediated by the audience’s gender and experience of sport participation. This study, based on the elaboration-likelihood model, examed the effects of commentary, sport experience, and gender on the audience’s perceived violence and enjoyment. Participants in this study were 120 college students watching a basketball game with commentary either emphasized the players’ hostility and violence or gived neutral comments. The results showed significant team – commentary and team - gender interactions in perceived violence. Audience’s perceived violence of the game was affected by the content of commentary, with no experience effects found. In terms of perceived enjoyment, only commentary - experience interaction was significant. Experienced audiences reported higher level of enjoyment with commentary emphasizing violence, while non-experienced audiences found neutral commentary more enjoyable. | |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 次 第壹章 緒論……………………………………………1 第一節 問題背景……………………………………1 第二節 傳播與說服的理論…………………………6 第三節 探討播報與觀眾知覺的研究………………10 第四節 研究問題與假設……………………………13 第五節 名詞解釋……………………………………14 第貳章 研究方法………………………………………16 第一節 實驗參與者…………………………………16 第二節 研究設計……………………………………17 第三節 研究程序……………………………………18 第四節 測量工具……………………………………21 第五節 資料分析……………………………………22 第參章 結果……………………………………………23 第一節 預試…………………………………………23 第二節 測量工具的信度檢驗………………………24 第三節 暴力知覺……………………………………24 第四節 樂趣知覺……………………………………27 第肆章 討論……………………………………………30 第一節 暴力知覺方面………………………………30 第二節 樂趣知覺方面………………………………34 第三節 研究限制……………………………………36 第四節 應用上的意義………………………………37 第五節 結論…………………………………………38 | |
| dc.format.extent | 327435 bytes | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.ntus.edu.tw/handle/987654321/70444 | |
| dc.language | zh-TW | |
| dc.publisher | 體育研究所 | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | 參考文獻 中文部份 李茂政(民69)：影響態度與改變行為。台北：黎明文化。 莫季雍(民91)：傳播科技與運動發展：機會與挑戰。大專體育雙月刊，第59期，頁3-10。 楊意菁、陳芸芸譯(民90)：媒體原理與塑造。臺北市：韋伯文化。 外文部份 Bandura, A.(1977).Social Learning theory. Enlewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall. Bandura, A., Ross, D.,& Ross, S. (1961).Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive modes. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(10), 575-582. Berscheid, E. (1966). Opinion change and communicator-communicate similarity and dissimilarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(7), 670-680. Bryant, J., Comisky, P., & Zillmann, D. (1977). Drama in Sports Commentary. Journal of Communication, 27(3), 140-149. Bryant, J., Brown, D., Comisky, P. W., & Zillmann, D. (1982). Sports and Spectators: Commentary and Appreciation. Journal of Communication, 32(1), 109-119. Bryant, J., Zillmann, D., & Ranney, A. A. (1998). Violence and the enjoyment of media sports. In Wenner.L.A. (Ed.), MediaSport. (pp. 252-265). London, UK : Routledge. Buss, A. H.,& Durkee, A.(1957). An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. Journal of Consulting Psychology,21, 343-349. Chaiken, S. (1979). Communication Physical Attractiveness and Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(7), 1387- 1397. Chaiken, S., & Eagly, A. H. (1983). Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion : The role of communi-cator salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(7), 241-256. Coakley, J. (1998). Sport and the Media. In Coakley(Ed.), Sport in Society: Issues and Controversies. (pp. 367-400). Boston: McGraw-Hill. Comisky, P., Bryant, J., & Zillmann, D. (1977). Commentary as a Substitute for Action. Journal of Communication, 27(3), 150-153. Ducan, M. C., & Brummett, B. (1987). The mediation of spectator sport. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 58, 168-177. Eitzen, D. S., & Sage, G. H. (1993). Sport and the mass media. In Brown & Benchmark(Ed.), Sociology of North American Sport. (pp. 273-299). Dubuque: IA. Eccles(Parsons),J., Adler, T.,Futterman, R., Golff,S.B., Kaczala, C.M., Meece,J.L., & Midgley.C.(1983). Expectation,values and academic behaviors. In Spenc,J.T. (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation. San Francisco:Freeman. Eccles, J.S. & Michigan.(2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals.Annu.Rev.Psychol,53,109-132. Gill, D.L.(2002). Gender and sport behavior. In Horns,T.S.(Ed), Advances in Sport Psychology. Champagin, IL : Human Kinetics. Higbee, K. L. (1969). Fifteen years of fear arousal: Research on threat appeals: 1953-1968. Psychological Bulletin, 72(7), 426-444. Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influnce of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(7), 635-650. Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and Persuasion. New Haven: Yale University Press. Irlinger, P. (1994). The contribution of televised sports to the spread of sport activities. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 29, 201-210. Janis, I. L., & Feshbach, S. (1953). Effects of fear-arousing communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48(7), 78-92. Koppett, L. (1994). Sports illusion, sports reality. Urbana,IL: University of Illinois Press. Marks, G., & Miller, N. (1988). Perception of attitude similarity : Effect of anchored versus unanchored positions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14(7), 92-102. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). Issue-involvement of persuasive intent and involvement on cognitive responses and persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(10),1915-1926. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration like-lihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,19( 7),123-205. Rhine, R., & Severance, L. (1970). Ego-involvement, discrepancy, source credibility, and attitude change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16,175-190. Smith, M.D. (1978). Social learning of violence in minor hockey. In F.L. Smoll & R. E. (Eds), Psychological perspectives in youth sports (pp. 91-106).Washington, DC : Hemisphere. Sullivan, D. B. (1991). Commentary and Viewer Perception of Player Hostility :Adding Punch to Televised Sports. Journal of Broadcasting &Electronic Media, 35, 487-504. Weber, A. L. (1992). Social Psychology. NY: HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. Weinberg, R. S., & Gould, D. (1995). Foundations of sport and exercise psychology. IL : Human Kinetics. | |
| dc.subject | 播報;知覺;暴力;樂趣 | |
| dc.subject | commentary;perception;violence;enjoyment | |
| dc.title | 電視運動播報對觀眾暴力與樂趣知覺的影響 | |
| dc.title | The Effects of Commentary on the Audience’s Perceived Violence and Enjoyment in Television Sports | |
| dc.type | thesis | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1