Publication: 扯鈴基本動作學習的雙手協調
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳重佑 | |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chen, Chung-Yu | |
| dc.creator | 冉茂萍 | |
| dc.creator | Jan, Mao-Ping | |
| dc.date | 2012 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-02-27T08:03:32Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-30T15:34:24Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-02-27T08:03:32Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017-02-27T08:03:32Z | |
| dc.description | 學位類別：碩士 | |
| dc.description | 校院名稱：國立臺灣體育運動大學 | |
| dc.description | 系所名稱：體育研究所 | |
| dc.description | 學號：19701013 | |
| dc.description | 畢業學年度：100年 | |
| dc.description | 論文頁數：42頁 | |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究主要目的在探討藉由扯鈴運鈴動作學習歷程，雙手動作的協調性、穩定性與動作型態的練習效應。實驗以7名未曾有扯鈴運動經驗的大專院校之體育運動員為實驗參加者，進行連續一週的扯鈴運鈴動作學習，並以VICON三度空間影像分析系統（攝影機：MX-F40）進行動作過程的資料收集，並以Nexus 1.6.1版軟體分析跳躍過程下肢各關節位移、速度、力量、力矩等運動學參數，研究的統計方法為重複量數單因子變異數分析與HSD法事後比較，顯著水準設定為.05，比較扯鈴運鈴上肢動作行為的差異。分析結果顯示，學習初期與學習後期雙手的協調性隨著練習而逐漸提升，其上肢動作的穩定性也隨著練習而提升。動作型態方面的改變，學習初期與學習後期的動作表現顯示腕關節動作角速度時間峰值差約為50ms，肘關節角速度則並無明顯差異，代表兩關節間的動作較為獨立，呈現出整個學習階段肢段動作從凍結自由度轉變為釋放自由度的特徵。本研究的結果說明，扯鈴運鈴動作練習過程中，雙手動作的協調性、穩定性與動作型態會隨著不同的學習階段產生轉變。 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this study was to investigate the practice effects of coordination, stability, and movement pattern in diabolo of basic movement during the learning process. Seven participants never have diabolo movement experience physical education students. To learning diabolo of basic movement for a week. The Vicon 3-D motion analysis system with 8 cameras (MX-F40, 200 Hz) were synchronized to acquire the kinematical data respectively. The Vicon Nexus 1.6.1 was used to calculate the kinematics parameters of high extremity that included displacement, velocity, moment, etc. Repeated measure one-way ANOVA and HSD post-hoc were adopted to analyze the statistical difference with an alpha level of .05. The movement pattern showed the timing difference was around 50ms between peak velocity of wrist. It appeared that two joints reached high speed in sequence and intersegment acted independent to release degree of freedom（DOF）. It indicated that the Bimanual Coordination, stability, and movement pattern during the diabolo of basic movement learning. | |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 次 第一章、緒論……………………………………………………………1 第一節、問題背景……………………………………………………1 第二節、研究目的與假設……………………………………………3 第三節、研究範圍與限制……………………………………………3 第四節、名詞解釋與操作性定義……………………………………4 第五節、研究的重要性………………………………………………5 第二章、文獻探討………………………………………………………7 第一節、理論基礎--自由度 …………………………………………7 第二節、雙手協調工作………………………………………………10 第三節、學習過程的行為改變………………………………………13 第四節、結語…………………………………………………………16 第三章、研究方法與步驟………………………………………………17 第一節、實驗參與者…………………………………………………17 第二節、實驗儀器與器材……………………………………………17 第三節、實驗步驟……………………………………………………20 第四節、資料處理與分析……………………………………………21 第四章、結果與討論……………………………………………………22 第一節、上肢動作的行為特徵………………………………………22 第二節、鈴的運動學參數變化………………………………………30 第三節、綜合討論……………………………………………………34 第五章、結論與建議……………………………………………………35 第一節、結論…………………………………………………………35 第二節、建議…………………………………………………………36 | |
| dc.format.extent | 1058876 bytes | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.ntus.edu.tw/handle/987654321/71211 | |
| dc.language | zh-TW | |
| dc.publisher | 體育研究所 | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | 一、中文部份 張春興（1989）。張氏心理學辭典。台北市：東華。 成戎珠（1994）。動作發展新理論：動力系統理論之介紹。中華物療誌，19（1），88-97。 黃鱗棋、卓俊伶（1998）。關節自由度對間斷動作表現的影響：個案研究。體育學報，25，229-237。 陳重佑，陳帝佑（2004）。動態系統理論在動作行為學之應用。彰化師大體育學報，4，53-65。 劉有德（2008）。動作技能學習。台北市，禾楓。 胡明霞（2009）。動作控制與動作學習。台北市，金名。 張國華（2010）。環境限制下投擲準確性的自由度效應。未出版之碩士論文，國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。 劉盈君，楊梓楣（2009）。關節自由度限制引致飛鏢投擲表現之改變。大專體育學刊，11，（2），47-56 二、英文部分 Bernstein, N. (1967). The coordination and regulation of movements. Oxford England:Pergamon Press. Hashizume, K., & Matsuo, T. (2004). Temporal and spatial factors reflecting performance improvement during learning three-ball cascade juggling. Human Movement Science, 23, 207-233. Keele, S. W.（1968）. Movement control in skilled motor performent. Psychologial Bulletin, 70, 837-403. Lantero, D. A., & Ringenbach, S. D. (2009). Factor influencing children’s performances of a steady-state bimanual coordination task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 80(2), 205-212. McGraw,M.B.（1943）. The neuromuscular maturation of the human infant. New York: Columbia University. McGill, R.A.（2006）. Motor learning and control: Concepts and applications（8th ed）. New York: McGraw-Hill. Newell, K. M. (1986). Constraints on the development of coordination. In M. G. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control (pp. 314–360).Boston: Martinus Nijhoff. Southard, D., & Higgins, T.（1987）. Changing movement patterns: Effects of demonstration and practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 58, 77-80. Schmidt, R. A.（1975）. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning theory. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260. Schmidt, R. A., Lee, T. D.（1999）. Motor Control and Learning. USA: Human Kinetics. Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, G. A.（2008）.Motor learning and performance:Asituation-based learning approach.(4th Ed.).Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Schneider, K., Zernicke, R. A., Schmidt, R. A., & Hart, T. J.(1989). Changes in limb dynamics during practice of rapid arm movements. Journal of Biomechanics, 22, 805–817. Scholz, J. P., & Schöner, G. (1999). The uncontrolled manifold concept: Identifying control variables for a functional task.Experimental Brain Research, 126,289–306. Schöner, G. (1995). Recent developments and problems in human movement science and their conceptual implications. Ecological Psychology, 7, 291–314. Southard, D., & Higgins, T. (1987). Changing movement patterns: Effects of demonstration and practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 58, 77–80. Steenbergen, B., Marteniuk, R. G., & Kalbfleisch, L. E. (1995).Achieving coordination in prehension: Joint freezing and postural contributions. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 333–348. van Emmerik, R. E. A., den Brinker, B. P. L. M., Vereijken, B., & Whiting, H. T. A. (1989). Preferred tempo in the learning of a gross cyclical action. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 251–262. Vereijken, B., van Emmerik, R. E. A., Bongaardt, R., Beek, W. J., & Newell, K. M. (1997). Changing coordinative structures in complex skill acquisition. Human Movement Science, 16, 823–844. Vereijken, B., van Emmerik, R. E. A., Whiting, H. T. A., & Newell, K. M. (1992). Free(z)ing degrees of freedom in skill acquisition. Journal of Motor Behavior, 24, 133–142. Vereijken, B., Whiting, H. T. A., & Beek, W. J. (1992). A dynamical systems approach to skill acquisition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 323–344. Zanone, P. G., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1992). Evolution of behavioral attractors with learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 403–421. Zanone, P. G., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1997). Coordination dynamics of learning and transfer: Collective and component levels. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1454–1480. Turvey,M.T.,Fitch,H.L.,& Tuller,B.（1982）. The Bernstein perspective: I.The problems of degrees of freedom and context-conditioned variability.In J. A. S. Kelso（Ed.）,Human motor behavior: An introduction（pp. 239-252）. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. | |
| dc.subject | 動作學習;協調;動態系統 | |
| dc.subject | motor learning;Coordination;dynamical systems | |
| dc.title | 扯鈴基本動作學習的雙手協調 | |
| dc.title | The Bimanual Coordination of Basic Diabolo Movement | |
| dc.type | thesis | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1