Publication:
東豐自行車綠廊居民非使用價值之評估

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisor黃錦煌
dc.contributor.advisorHuang, Chin-Huang
dc.creator林宜妏
dc.creatorLin, I-Wen
dc.date2014
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-27T13:46:35Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-30T15:40:56Z
dc.date.available2017-02-27T13:46:35Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-27T13:46:35Z
dc.description學位類別：碩士
dc.description校院名稱：國立臺灣體育運動大學
dc.description系所名稱：運動管理學系碩士班
dc.description學號：10105006
dc.description畢業學年度：102年
dc.description論文頁數：73頁
dc.description.abstract騎乘自行車為近年來最受歡迎的休閒活動之一，除了維持身體的健康更可以在沿途欣賞美麗的風景，東豐自行車綠廊由一條廢棄的鐵道改建而成，而自行車道除了具有遊憩休閒的使用價值外，對於周遭居民來說更有存在或遺贈使下一代使用的非使用價值之存在。一般而言總經濟價值分為使用價值及非使用價值，非使用價值無法使用一般市場財來評估，必須將非使用價值貨幣化才能計算實際的價值。本研究將非使用價值分為三種，分別是自行車道本身的存在價值、留給後代子孫使用的遺贈價值、未來可使用的選擇價值。並採用條件評價法、雙界二元模型及存活函數分析來估算東豐自行車綠廊沿途居民的非使用價值。研究結果顯示平均每位居民每年的願付金額分別為存在價值159.11元、遺贈價值311.92元、選擇價值164.92元。
dc.description.abstractBicycling has become one of the most popular leisure activities nowadays. Besides maintaining physical health, cyclists can also enjoy the scenery. Tong-Fon Bikeway Green Corridor is rebuilt from an abandoned railway, and apart from its leisure and recreation value, a non-use value for residents nearby also exist, which is that their future generations may also enjoy the bikeway. Generally, the total economic value is divided into use value and non-use value. Non-use value cannot be assessed with market goods, but by calculating it after monetization. This study divides non-use value into three parts: the existence value of the bikeway itself, the bequest value for nearby residents, and the option value for future use. Contingent Valuation Method, double-bounded dichotomous model, and survival curve analysis is used to estimate the non-use value of Tong-Fon Bikeway Green Corridor. Results pointed out that the amount residents nearby are willing to pay were 159.11 NT dollars for existence value, 311.92 NT dollars for bequest value, and 164.92 NT dollars for option value.
dc.description.tableofcontents中文摘要................i Abstract................ii 謝誌................iii 目錄................iv 表目錄................vi 圖目錄................viii 第一章 緒論............1 第一節研究背景及動機....1 第二節研究目的..........4 第三節研究範圍與流程....4 第二章 文獻探討........8 第一節總經濟價值........8 第二節非使用價值........10 第三節選擇價值..........15 第三章 研究設計........18 第一節研究方法與模型....18 第二節 研究步驟.........23 第三節 問卷設計及抽樣...24 一、問卷設計............24 二、抽樣................33 第四章 研究結果分析....35 第一節受試者人口特性分析........35 第二節居民對東豐自行車綠廊非使用價值之評估....42 第三節實證分析....................46 第五章 結論與建議....53 第一節結論....53 第二節建議....54 參考文獻......56 一、中文部分....56 二、英文部分....58 附錄一....64 附錄二....67
dc.format.extent2740750 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ntus.edu.tw/handle/987654321/71393
dc.languagezh-TW
dc.publisher運動管理學系碩士班
dc.relation.isbasedon一、中文部分 王麗婷 (2005)。以條件評價法探討嘉義樹木園之非市場價值 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學，嘉義市。 王品婷 (2011)。東豐自行車道遊憩效益評估 (國科會大專生研究計畫)。國立臺灣體育運動大學，台中市。 古志銘 (2009)。運動觀光吸引力、自行車道形象、休閒滿意度與重遊意願關係之研究－以嘉義縣朴子溪自行車道為例 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學：嘉義縣。 台中市政府民政局 (2013) 。 台中市人口數統計里鄰戶數及人口數統計表。 取自http://demographics.taichung.gov.tw/Demographic/Web/TCCReport01.aspx 交通部觀光局，2012年國人旅遊狀況調查。取自 http://admin.taiwan.net.tw/upload/statistic/20130726/56bed5af-09ea-4f51-8f4c-c3ecacdb7ec4.doc 吳珮瑛、蘇明達 (2001)。 六十億元的由來-墾丁國家公園資源經濟價值評估。 臺北市：前衛出版社。 林佩蓉 (2011) 島嶼居民對觀光發展態度與遊憩資源維護願付價值之研究-以台灣澎湖群島為例 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立東華大學，花蓮市。 張端益 (2004)。 編定工業區公共服務評價之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學：台北市。 取自 http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35918 許硯涵 (2011)。林田山林業文化園區遊憩資源效益評估 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立東華大學，花蓮市。 陳永祥 (2013)。屏東縣大鵬灣自行車道騎乘者遊憩體驗滿意度與行為意向之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學：屏東市。 黃宗煌 (1990) 。環境資源估價之研究-非市場估價方法。 中研院經濟論文，18(1)，93-135。 黃清光 (2009)。屏東蘭花蕨自行車道乘騎者之環境感受與休閒效益之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。亞洲大學：台中市。 黃錦煌、蕭柏勳、李俊鴻 (2009)。遊客參與節慶活動擁擠成本與滿意度之市場區隔分析。觀光休閒學報，15(2)，140-161。 楊舒雯 (2006)。自行車道遊客特性與遊憩服務品質之研究－以台中縣東豐自行車綠廊為例 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立體育學院：桃園縣。 葉俊麟 (2013)。運動觀光吸引力、自行車道形象與重遊意願關係之研究-以日月潭自行車道為例 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣體育運動大學：台中市。 葉珮如 (2009)。自行車道使用者休閒涉入與地方依附之相關研究-以臺北縣八里左岸自行車道為例 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學：台北市。 劉錦添 (1992) 。環境風險降低的實質評估-台灣的實證研究。經濟論文，20(2)，679-695。 劉吉川 (1997) 。 野生動物保育會寶及通訊-黑面琵鷺棲息地遊憩使用之經濟價值。 戶外遊憩研究，10(4)，19-39。 劉惠珍 (2005) 。花蓮縣赤柯山與六十時金針產地轉型休閒農業區之研究。第二屆台灣地方鄉鎮觀光產業與前瞻學術研討會。 蕭代基、鄭蕙燕、吳珮瑛、錢玉蘭、溫麗琪 (2002)。 環境保護之成本效益分析：理論、方法與應用。台北：俊傑書局。 二、英文部分 Alberini, A. (1995). Efficiency vs. Bias of Willingness to Pay Estimates: Bivariate and Interval-data Models. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29(2), 169-180. Barde, J.-Ph. (1991). Economie et politique de l'environnement. Economics and policy of the environment. Paris: Universitaires de France. Bateman, I. J., & Langford, I. H. (1997). Non-users' Willingness to Pay for a National Park: An Application and Critique of the Contingent Valuation Method. Regional Studies, 31(6), 571-582. Barget, E. & Gouguet Jean-Jacques (2007). The Total Economic Value of Sporting Events Theory and Practice. Journal of Sports Economics, 8(2), 165-182. doi: 10.1177/1527002505279349 Bradley, R. M. (2010). Direct and indirect benefits of improving river quality: quantifying benefits and a case study of the River Klang, Malaysia. The Environmentalist, 30(3), 228-241. doi: 10.1007/s10669-010-9267-8 Cameron, T. A., & James, M. D, (1987). Efficient Estimation Methods for Closed-Ended Contingent Valuation Surveys. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(2), 269-276. Carson, R., T., & Mitchell, R. C. (1991). The Value of Diamonds and Water. Paper presented at the Stockholm Meeting of the European Association of Environmental and Resources Economists. Cameron, T. A. & Quiggin, J. (1994). Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data from a "Dichotomous Choice with Follow-up" Questionnaire. Journal of Environment Economics and Management, 27(3), 218-234. Carson, R. D., & Wilks, L.,Imber, D. (1994). Valuing the Preservation of Australia's Kakadu Conservation Zone. Oxford Economic, Papers, 46, 727-749 Cicchetti, C. J., & Wilde Louis L.(1992). Uniqueness, Irreversibility, and the Theory of Nonuse Values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74(5), 1121-1125. Cooper, J. C., Hanemann, W. M., & Signorello, G. (2002). One and One-Half Bound Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(4), 742-750. Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: .John Wiley & Sons, Inc. David, O., & Despina, M. (2000). Economic Valuation of the Non-use Attributes of a Wetland: A Case-study for Lake Kerkini. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(6), 755-767. Hanemann, W. M., Loomis, J. B. & Kanninen, B. (1991), Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73, 1255-1263. Hugues, NLOM. Jean (2011). The Economic Value of Congo Basin Protected Areas Goods and Services. Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(1), 130-142 Owen, G. J. (2006). THE INTANGIBLE BENEFITS OF SPORTS TEAMS. Public Finance and Management, 6(3), 321-345. Kanninen, B. J. (1995) Bias in Discrete Response Contingent Valuation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28,114-125. Krutilla, J. V. (1967). Conservation reconsidered. American Economic Review. Regional Studies, 57, 787-796. Kerr, G. N. (2000). Dichotomous choice contingent valuation probability distributions. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 44(2), 233-252. Kopp, R. J. (1992). Why Existence Value Should Be Used in Cost-Benefit Analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 11, 123-125. Kanninen, B. J. (1995). Bias in discrete response contingent valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28(1), 114-125. Lockwood, Michael, Loomis J., DeLacy, T.(1993). A Contingent Valuation Survey and Benefit-Cost Analysis of Forest Preservation in East Gippsland, Australia. Journal of Environmental Management, 38(3),233-243. León, C. J. (1996). Double bounded survival values for preserving the landscape of natural parks. Journal of Environmental Management, 46(2), 103-118. Loomis, J. B. and Walsh, R. G. (1997). Recreation economic decisions: Comparing benefits and costs (2nd ed.). State College, PA: Venture Publishing, Inc. Lescuyer G. (1998). Globalisation of environmental monetary valuation and sustainable development: an experience in the tropical forest of Cameroon. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 1(1), 115-133 Lawless, J. F. (2003). Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley. Laverty Melina & Sterling Eleanor (2009) Passive Values. The Connexions Project and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. Retrieved from http://cnx.org/content/m12170/1.2/?format=pdf McConnell, K. E. (1983). Existence and Bequest value. Managing Air Quality and Scenic Resources at National Parks and Wilderness Area. Boulder, Colo. : Westview Press. Mitchell. R. C. & Carson. R. T. (1989). Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. Magat. W. A., Huber, J., Viscusi, W. K., & Bell, J. (2000). An Iterative Choice Approach to Valuing Clean Lakes, Rivers, and Streams. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 21(1), 7-43. Malhotra, I (2004). Marketing Research : An Applied Orientation (3rd. ed.). Sydney: Prentice Hall. Matleena Kniivilä (2006). Users and non-users of conservation areas: Are there differences in WTP, motives and the validity of responses in CVM surveys? Ecological Economics, 59(4), 530–539. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.11.017 Nick, Hanley (2008). Valuing Mediterranean Forests: Towards Total Economic Value. Mountain Research and Development, 28(3), 339-340 Fromm Oliver (2000). Ecological Structure and Functions of Biodiversity as Elements of Its Total Economic Value. Environmental and Resource Economics, 16(3), 303–328. Randall, A., Hoehn J. P. & Brookshire D. S. (1983). Contingent Valuation Surveys for Evaluating Environmental Assets. Natural Resources Journal, 23, 635-647. Stacy, E. W. (1962). A generalization of the gamma distribution. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 33(3), 1187-1192. Stevens, T. H., Echeverria, J., Glass, R. J., Hager, T., More,. T.A., (1991). Measuring the existence value of wildlife: what do CVM estimates really show. Land Economics, 67, 390-400 Stevens, T. H., Benin, S., & J. S. (1995). Public attitudes and economic values for wetland preservation in New England. In Wetlands, 15, 226-231. Scarpa, R., & Bateman, I. (1993). Efficiency Gains Afforded by Improved Bid Design Versus Follow-Up Valuation Questions in Discrete-Choice CV Studies. Land Economics, 72(6), 299-311. Tomas, D. H. L., Ayache, F., & Hollos, G. E. (1991). Use and Non-use Values in the Conservation of Ichkeul National Park. Tunisia in Environmental Conservation, 18(2), 119-130. Weisbrod, B. (1964). Collective-consumption services of individual consumption goods. Quarterly Journal of Economic, 78, 471-477 Whitehead, J. C., and G. C. Blomquist (1991). Measuring Contingent Values for Wetlands: Effects of Information About Related Environmental Goods. Water Resources Research, 27(10), 2523-2531. Whitehead John (1995). Differentiating use and non-use values with the properties of the variation function. Economics Letters. Taylor and Francis Journals, 2(10), 388-390.
dc.subject存在價值;選擇價值;遺贈價值;條件評價法
dc.subjectexistence value;option value;Bequest;Contingent Valuation Method
dc.title東豐自行車綠廊居民非使用價值之評估
dc.titleAn Evaluation on the Non-use Values of Residents’Towards the Tong-Fon Bikeway Green Corridor
dc.typethesis
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
0037301.pdf
Size:
2.61 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

學位論文(103學年度之前)