Publication:

嘉義縣國民小學辦理運動社團考量因素及阻礙因素之研究

本研究旨在探討嘉義縣國民小學辦理運動社團之考量因素與阻礙因素的內涵及關聯性。本研究採問卷調查法，研究對象為嘉義縣國民小學運動社團主管及承辦人。研究工具以自編研究問卷，採用李克特五點量表，共發出372份，回收有效問卷337份，有效問卷率90.6%。蒐集之資料以SPSS 12.0進行分析，包括：項目分析、因素分析、信度分析、描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、雪費法事後檢定、徑路分析、典型相關分析進行處理，結果發現：

(一)嘉義縣國民小學運動社團業務主管或承辦人以男性居多，多為中生代，至少有10年以上的服務年資，且教育程度頗高。

(二)嘉義縣國民小學有發展重點運動項目(運動校隊)者佔73.3%，顯示嘉義縣基層學校大多能積極配合國家體育政策，組訓運動代表隊，培育優秀運動人才。而發展的運動重點項目多集中於足球、田徑和棒球等三項。

(三)嘉義縣103學年度國民小學平均每校設有3.18個運動社團，各校設置的個數於0到4個，佔全體學校數的76%，顯示嘉義縣對於增進國民小學運動社團的推展還有許多努力的空間。

(四)嘉義縣國民小學辦理運動社團之考量因素優先順位，依序是開辦因素、社團發展、行政因素、計畫經費、納入課程、社區資源、師資來源、時間規劃、自籌經費。

(五)嘉義縣國民小學辦理運動社團之阻礙因素優先順位，依 序是人力支援、場地器材、參與動機、事務規劃、經費因素。

(六)嘉義縣不同背景變項之國民小學辦理運動社團考量因素之差異，結果顯示不同教育程度之受試者在部分構面因素有顯著差異，不同職務、不同學校規模之受試者有顯著差異，而不同性別、年齡、服務年資、學校位置之受試者則無顯著差異。

(七)嘉義縣不同背景變項之國民小學辦理運動社團阻礙因素之差異，結果顯示不同性別、教育程度之受試者在部分構面因素有顯著差異，而不同學校位置及學校規模之受試者有顯著差異，而不同年齡、服務年資及職務之受試者則無顯著差異。

(八)嘉義縣國民小學辦理運動社團之考量因素及阻礙因素之間有顯著相關存在，阻礙因素的人力支援、事務規劃、經費因素與考量因素的計畫經費之間會互為影響。

This study was designed to investigate the relationship of consideration and obstacles on hosting the sport clubs in Chiayi County Elementary Schools. A self-developed, 5 scale Likert scale questionnaires was distributed to the 372 organizers of sport club in Chiayi County elementary schools. Of the 372 questionnaires, 337 were valid responses corresponding with a 90.6% return rate. The collected data were analyzed with SPSS 12.0, including: item analysis, factor analysis, reliability analysis, descriptive statistics, t test, ANOVA analysis, Scheffe’s method, path analysis, canonical correlation analysis. The results of the study shows:

A. Most of sport club organizers and promoters are male in Chiayi County elementary schools, mostly Mesozoic, with at least 10 years of service, and high level of education.

B. 73.3% of Chiayi County elementary schools have organized target sports items (school sports varsity), showing mostly Chiayi County elementary schools can actively cooperate with the national sports policy, group training sports teams, to nurture sports talent students. The campaign focused on the development are more concentrated in football, track and field and baseball items.

C. The 103 academic year in Chiayi County primary schools have an average of 3.18 per school sports clubs, the number of sports clubs in schools set 0-4 accounted for 76% of all schools number, the result display Chiayi County Elementary Schools have to pay many efforts to promote sports.

D. Chiayi County elementary schools sports clubs apply the priority order of the considerations factors, in turn is a start-up factor, community development, administrative factors, plan funds, into the curriculum, community resources, sources of Teachers, time to plan, self-financing.

E. Chiayi County elementary schools sports clubs host the priority order of the obstacles factors, in turn is a human support, space equipment, engaging Motivation, affairs plan, financial factors.

F. the differences of different Chiayi County elementary schools background variables in hosted sports clubs considerations factors, the results showed that the subjects of the different levels of education have significant differences in some facet of factors, different positions, different sizes of school subjects had significant differences and different gender, age, years of service, the location of the school there was no significant difference between subjects.

G. the differences of different Chiayi County elementary schools background variables in hosted sports clubs obstacles factors, the result showed different gender, education level of the subjects had significant differences in some facet of factors, and the location and size of the school in different schools of subjects there are significant differences, and different age, years of service and the subjects of his position was no significant difference.

H. Having a positive correlation between considerations factors and obstacles factors in Chiayi County elementary schools sports clubs hosting , “human support”,” “affairs planning” ,”financial factors” of obstacles factors will affect each other “plan funds” of considerations factors.