Publication:

我國文化藝術補助政策之研究─以舞蹈表演團體為例

本研究主要目的在瞭解我國與其他國家之文化藝術補助政策現況，且進一步以問卷調查國內舞蹈表演團體對文建會、國藝會及各縣市文化局補助政策之需求與期望，以研擬我國文化藝術補助政策之具體建議，作為政府施政之參考。問卷調查研究對象分為非扶植團體：表演藝術雜誌所發行之88年表演藝術年鑑中刊登之舞蹈表演團體（學校機關除外）及扶植團體：文建會演藝團隊發展扶植計畫90年度補助之18個舞團。問卷統計分析方式包括：百分比考驗、排序、獨立樣本t考驗、單因子變異數分析及薛費事後比較法。

根據研究發現：一、扶植團體在迫切需要政府相關單位給予協助之優先前三項為：補助經費、行政業務人才培育、拓展經費來源及相關國際資訊之交流互訪。而非扶植團體則為：補助經費、拓展經費來源、舞者專業培育。二、所有舞蹈表演團體在籌辦演出優先前三項考量因素皆為：經費來源是否充裕、例行性演出、外界邀約。三、在政府各單位補助申請流程、申請條件、審查標準、審查人員之專業水準等滿意度方面，扶植團體滿意度皆高於非扶植團體。

根據上述發現，本研究對我國文化藝術補助政策提出以下改進建議：

一、文化藝術補助政策相關法令訂定需更加明確且徹底執行。

二、政府文化藝術補助預算應更充裕且不被挪用。

三、積極培育文化藝術專業人才。

四、加強資源的區域均衡及增建相關展演軟硬體設施。

五、透過教育培育文化藝術參與人口。

六、立法鼓勵企業團體贊助文化藝術團體。

The purpose of this study was to realize the current condition of subsidy policy in Taiwan and other countries. A questionnaire was carried out to investigate what domestic dance performance groups expect from the government. Based on this research, concrete suggestions to the subsidy policy on culture and arts in Taiwan are presented.

The results are: 1. For subsidized groups the priorities of assistance from the government are: subsidy, administrative talents cultivation, financial sources and international exchange. For non-subsidized groups, the priorities are: subsidy, financial sources, dancer cultivation. 2. For dance performance groups, the considerations for organizing a performance are: sufficient finance, routine performance, invitations. 3. Subsidized groups are more satisfied than non- subsidized groups with the procedures of subsidy application.

The following are the researcher’s suggestions:

1.Subsidy policy should be specific, and enforcement should be thorough.

2.Subsidy budget should be sufficient and used exclusively.

3.Cultivation of professionals should be progressive.

4.Resource distribution should meet regional balance, and facilities for performance should be increased.

5.Participants for culture and arts should be increased through education.

6.Patronage to culture and arts groups should be encouraged through legislation.