Publication:

影響跳遠成績之外在因素及適當試跳次數之分析

論文提要：

本研究旨在探討影響跳遠成績之外在因素及適當試跳次數。研究樣本為高雄縣路竹鄉下坑國民小學九十一學年度三、四、五、六年級中，隨機自四個年級中各抽取一班共四班119人。經過一週兩節的教學後，進行測驗所得資料應用SPSS 8.0統計軟體整理，獲得以下三點結論：

一、國小跳遠成績評量不同起跳板寬度(標準20公分、40公分)對成績影響：同一寬度(20公分或40公分)之真實丈量值優於法定丈量值，且差異達顯著水準(P<.05)。不同寬度(20公分或40公分)起跳板之真實丈量值與法定丈量值的差異均未達顯著水準(P>.05)。

二、國小跳遠成績評量有、無起跳板(線)限制對成績影響：二種寬度(20公分、40公分)起跳板之法定丈量值與無起跳板(線)限制之真實丈量值的差異達顯著水準　(P<.05)，但三種寬度(20公分、40公分、無限制)起跳板之真實丈量值的差異，未達顯著水準(P>.05)。

三、三種寬度各項測驗六次試跳(一至六次)間成績的差異未達顯著水準(P>.05)。

Abstract

The main purpose of this research was to discuss the influence on external factors and the tests of trials in long jump. A total of 119 students were picked randomly from the third, fourth, fifth, sixth graders at Shia-Keng elementary school in Luju, Kaohsiung in 2002. The researcher collected the data from these 119 students. These students were taught two sessions in a week; each session was forty-five minutes. After these students were tested, the researcher gathered the data from the 119 case studies with SPSS 8.0. The result of the research indicated the conclusions as follows:

1.The influence of different jumping boards on the evaluation of the elementary school students’performance in long jump – The same width (twenty or forty centimeter) of the jumping boards indicated that the real measurement was better than the legal measurement in the scores of the case studies, while the different width (twenty or forty centimeter) of the jumping board indicated that the differences in the real measurement and the legal one made no significant differences (p>.05).

2.The influence of jumping boards on the evaluation of the elementary school students’performance in long jump – The differences in the real measurement and the legal one for not using the jumping boards or using the twenty-centimeter and forty-centimeter jumping boards made significant differences (p<.05), while the differences in the real measurement for not using the jumping board and using two different-width jumping boards made no significant differences (p>.05).

3.The differences in the scores of each six 　tests of trials for not using the jumping board and using two different-width jumping boards indicated no significant difference (p>.05).