Publication:

我國水上安全救生員及救生教練培訓制度之研究

中文摘要

本研究鑑於救生員及救生教練之培訓制度在水上安全維護上的重要性，擬以國內主要水上救生組織為研究對象，經由文獻分析探究我國當前水上安全救生人員培訓的現況，同時參酌他國的培訓制度與經驗，藉以重新審視我國現行制度，進而加以討論並提出建議予相關單位參考。

本研究之結論如下：一、我國救生訓練啟蒙於民國33年，民國52年開辦首屆救生員及救生教練班的訓練。二、當前培訓之法令依據主要根據內政部消防署及體委會之相關規定，培訓單位則以紅十字會和水上救生協會最富盛名，且尚有不同單位各有獨立的培訓系統，受訓人員完成訓練要求後，由民間組織依其辦法自行發照。三、透過文獻分析就美國、澳洲、英國及我國的培訓制度進行比較，發覺：美國設有一全國性的水上救生聯盟以統整救生人力資源；同時，在澳洲與英國，由於救生組織的努力，水上救生早已成為民眾生活及文化中的一環。此外，國外強調將實習制度、救生實務狀況演練融入訓練課程，亦推動受訓對象年輕化的目標。再者，國外亦重視證照考核人員之專業資格的認定與授與，以及救生人員急救和心肺復甦的專業能力，並設有嚴明的救生員分級制度。上述研究發現，謹供政府及相關水上救生組織參酌。

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to analyze the meaning and function of the preparation system for the water lifeguards and instructors in Taiwan, so as to establish the standards for its practice, the contents for implements and the supplementary measures. The primary conclusions of this study were as follows:

The training of the water lifeguards started in 1944 and we had the first training courses for the lifeguards and instructors in 1963; the National Fire Agency Ministry Interior and the National Council on Physical Fitness and Sports made laws for the preparation system. Among the training organizations, the Red Cross Society of the Republic of China and the National Water Life-Saving Association were the most famous. And different training organizations had their own training and certificate systems.

By analyzing and comparing the preparation systems of the United States, Australia, the United Kingdom, and our own country, we could learn from other countries’ experiences and improve our own preparation system.

Based on the findings, implications and suggestions were proposed for the preparation system and future research.