Publication:

國中男女校學生休閒阻礙因素與解決之道之研究

本研究旨在探討國中男女校學生休閒行為阻礙因素與解決之道。主要目的有四：一、探討國中男女校學生在休閒參與和休閒阻礙之現況；二、探討不同背景特性之國中男女校學生在休閒參與之差異情形；三、探討不同背景特性之國中男女校學生在休閒阻礙之差異情形；四、探討國中男女校學生休閒阻礙因素解決之道。

本研究採問卷調查法進行資料蒐集，以嘉義縣東石、朴子兩所國中為研究對象，樣本的選取採叢集立意抽樣法，共發出問卷576份，回收有效問卷548份。並將所得之有效問卷分別以描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析等統計方法進行資料分析。本研究經分析討論後，獲得的結論如下：

1.國中男女校學生在休閒參與方面以娛樂性較高。

2.最常參與之休閒活動前五項依序為：看電視、聊天、聽音樂、騎腳踏車、上網查尋資料。

3.不同性別、年級、家庭社經地位、休閒費用及課業輔導之國中生在休閒參與有顯著差異。

4.國中男女校學生在休閒阻礙方面以外在性阻礙的構面較高。

5.休閒阻礙前三項依序為：因為活動所需的費用太高、因為參加太多的課後才藝班、因為對該休閒活動不喜歡。

6.不同性別、年級、家庭社經地位、休閒費用及課業輔導之國中生在休閒阻礙上無顯著差異。

This study aims at disclosing the leisure behaviors and obstacles for junior high school student. The purpose of this study has four folds: 1. to discuss the current situation of leisure participation and participation obstacles: 2.to explore any significant difference among student demographic variables on leisure participation and participation obstacle: 3.to find out the solutions for the participation obstacles.

A survey was conducted to carry out the data collection by distributing the questionnaires to students from Putz and Don Shi Junior high school. The random sampling in selected cluster was applied by which the 576 questionnaires were distributed and was resulted in a 548 valid responses. The gathered data was then computed by descriptive analysis, simple t-test analysis, ANOVA analysis. The findings of the study indicated that,

1.The main reason for Junior high school student to take part in leisure activities is of Entertainment

2.The top 5 rankings for the participation in leisure activities includes: watching TV, chatting, listening music, biking, and internet surfing, respectively.

3.There are significant differences among gender, grade, socioeconomic, leisure expenditure, and academic consultant on leisure participation.

4.The main reason for Junior high school student not to take part in leisure activities could be contributed to the external obstacles.

5.The top 3 rankings for the participation obstacles in leisure activities includes: cost too much money, attend too much after school program, and have no interest in leisure activity.

6.There are no significant differences among gender, grade, socioeconomic, leisure expenditure, and academic consultant on leisure participation obstacles.