蘇金德Su, Jin-De2017-02-222025-07-302017-02-222017-02-22https://ir.ntus.edu.tw/handle/987654321/70526學位類別:碩士校院名稱:國立臺灣體育學院系所名稱:體育研究所畢業學年度:89年論文頁數:104頁中文摘要 選才與訓練是培育游泳運動員的兩個主要課題,不管理論研究多麼周詳與深入,實際調查、分析游泳教練的選才與訓練概念之異同,絕對是理論與實務結合的關鍵,筆者規劃本研究,其主要動機與目的是將經由本研究解析國內游泳教練的選才與訓練概念,經探討結果之發現,作為爾後教學訓練之依據,並提供推展游泳競技的相關單位或實務者參考,與尋求個人和普遍教練們能夠在選才與訓練實務上相互溝通。 本研究從搜尋文獻、訪談、設計問卷、實施調查,利用統計的適合度…等理論分析考驗137位教練(有效樣本)的調查結果,其發現如下: 一、基本資料發現,教練大多為40歲以下曾接受游泳訓練的男性運動員,並且目前多在從事游泳訓練與教學實務工作,且擔任縣市或學校代表隊游泳教練。 二、教練填答各個「選才」以及「訓練」問題的調查結果都明顯分佈在特定選項。 三、選才工作對「訓練效果」的影響最大;觀念上強調「客觀選才」,「測驗測量」及「觀察法」是慣常採用的選才方法。 四、「游泳技術」、「運動能力」為判別是否具有運動天才依據。 五、預估運動員可能達到最佳成績;絕大多數教練靠「經驗判斷」該選才概念是否有違科學的選才概念,值得商確。 六、選才應該落實在6∼10歲之間為選才起始年齡,其體型選才以「身體比例」選才為主,概念調查結果極符合理論。 七、從「個性心理特徵」方面著手選才是游泳教練建立的心理選才概念,此種偏向正確與否,很值得進一步探究。 八、訓練方面,「肌力」或「肌耐乳酸能力」,以及「柔軟」、「協調」,是觀念上及實際實施體能訓練所強調的。 九、技術指導方面,側重「游泳動作姿勢」則和學者們的研究發現有大的差別;需花費「長時間來培訓」才有可能造就出國家或國際級選手和學者們的統計結果相近。 十、偏重「體能」及「水中訓練」為國內多數游泳教練的訓練概念。 十一、從各種不同背景來分析發現大部分調查問題都顯示教練背景不同時,其填答結果並未達到統計上p<.05明顯差異。Abstract Selection and Training are two major issues in cultivating swimming sportsmen. No matter how comprehensively and exhaustively theory study has ever engaged,field investigation analyzing the contrasts of concepts of selecting and training swimming coaches is the crucial factor which might beneficial to the integration of theory and practice. Engaging in the study, the researcher's paramount motivation and objectives intend to analyzing the concepts of selecting and training of domestic swimming coaches. Through the findings of the study, the researcher hopes to provide useful information for the reference of teaching and training courses henceforth. Besides, the study might also provide useful reference for the associated institutions which promote swimming sports championships. Furthermore, it seeks mutual communication in theory and practice among individual and swimming coaches in general. The study through the processes of collecting data, interviewing, designing questionnaire, investigating and analyzing 137 coaches has the following findings, which are: 1. The basic information reveals that most of the coaches are male under 40 years old, having accepted the training of swimming courses, and currently are engaged in the practical work of swimming training and teaching businesses, and serve simultaneously as coaches of the Hsien, city or school swimming champion teams. 2. The investigating results which enquiring coaches about the issues of“selection” and “training” in the questionnaire are obviously disseminated at the specific items. 3. Selection work makes the paramount effect on the “training effects”; the conception of “objective selection”, “practical testing” and “observation method” are the generally used methods of selection. 4. ”Swimming skills” and “Sport capability” are used as criteria for selecting a sport genius. 5. Predicting the best performance of sportsmen, usually much depended solely on “coaches’ experiences”, is quite doubtful. It might conflict with the concept of scientific selection. 6. Selection should begin at the age between 6- 10 years old, body type selection should according to each individual’s “body proportion”, the concept findings are quite match with theory. 7. Through “personality psychology symptom” aspect to select sportsmen undoutly is the prevailing selection concept which most coaches are usually applying. However, the validity of the method is quite doubtful. It deserves to be further studied. 8. In the aspect of training, “muscle force” or “tolerance to lactic acid”, and flexibility”, “coordination” are the emphasizing points in concepts and physical training. 9. In the aspect of skill instruction, the emphasize on “swimming posture”has some great difference with the study of general scholars; while only through “long time cultivaion” can cultivate national or international championship sportsmen is quite similar to scholars’ accountant results. 10. Emphasizing “physical capability” and “underwater training” are the training concept which most domestic coaches propose. 11. Through the analysis of various background, most of the issues in the questionnaire reveals though the backgrounds are different, the responses do not attain the obvious difference in accountance.目 次 第一章 緒論………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究背景………………………………………………1 第二節 研究動機………………………………………………6 第三節 研究目的………………………………………………9 第四節 研究問題及其價值、重要性…………………………9 第五節 研究假設及限制………………………………………11 第六節 名詞詮釋………………………………………………13 第二章 文獻探討…………………………………………………19 第一節 運動教練課程文獻探討………………………………20 第二節 運動員選才訓練文獻探討……………………………22 第三節 游泳運動員選才與訓練文獻探討……………………26 第四節 結語……………………………………………………32 第三章 研究方法…………………………………………………35 第一節 研究規劃………………………………………………35 第二節 問卷設計………………………………………………38 第三節 實施調查………………………………………………43 第四節 資料彙整分析…………………………………………44 第四章 結果分析與討論…………………………………………51 第一節 全體受試者調查結果分析討論………………………51 第二節 選才與訓練調查結果高於理論值之解析研討………67 第三節 不同背景調查結果分析討論…………………………76 第五章 結論與建議………………………………………………90 第一節 研究發現………………………………………………90 第二節 建議……………………………………………………92 第三節 待解問題………………………………………………93658287 bytesapplication/pdf運動員訓練;概念;游泳;運動員選材Concepts;Training of Sportsmen;Selection of Sportsmen;Swimming游泳運動員選才與訓練概念研究 ∼以台灣地區的游泳教練為例∼A research of the concepts of selection and training of swimming sportsmen ~ A case study of swimming coaches in Taiwan area ~thesis