趙榮瑞Chao, Rong-Jui2017-02-222025-07-302017-02-222017-02-22https://ir.ntus.edu.tw/handle/987654321/70525學位類別：碩士校院名稱：國立台灣體育學院系所名稱：體育研究所學號：19001012畢業學年度：94年論文頁數：104頁　　本研究旨在瞭解教練領導行為與訓練滿意度二者間的相關關係；進而探討教練領導行為是否對訓練滿意度有預測力。以大專校院軟式網球甲組男、女選手為研究對象。根據調查所蒐集之資料，經描述統計、項目分析、因素分析、單因子變異數分析、相關分析、多元逐步迴歸分析等統計方法，結果歸納如下： 一、選手在知覺與喜好教練領導行為上，以團隊行為最高，而專制行為最低；性別、訓練天數及最高成就有顯著差異，其餘皆沒有顯著差異。 二、選手對訓練滿意度，以教練專業能力最高，而場地與設施最低；性別及年齡對訓練滿意度有顯著差異，其餘皆沒有顯著差異。 三、教練領導行為與訓練滿意度二者間有明顯的相關關係。 四、知覺教練領導行為中，以關懷及獎勵行為二個構面能有效的預測訓練滿意度；而喜好教練領導行為則無法有效預測訓練滿意度。　　The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of soft tennis coach’s leadership behaviors and training satisfaction. Another purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship among perception、preferable of coach’s leadership behaviors and training satisfaction. Also, the effects of perception and preferable of coach’s leadership behaviors on prediction of training satisfaction was investigate by this study. Questions in the questionnaires were developed by researcher. Descriptive statistics、item analysis、factor analysis、correlation analysis and multi-regression analysis were the statistical methods used to analyze this study. From the results of the study, several conclusions were made in below: 1. Regarding to the perceived and preferable coach’s leadership behaviors on the players, the top one was team behavior, with authoritarian behavior being the lowest one. Significant differences were showed regarding to sex、training frequency and most high achievement on the perceived coach’s leadership behaviors. 2. Regarding to the attitude toward training satisfaction of the college soft tennis players, the top one was coach’s professional ability with facilities and equipment being the lowest ones. Significant differences were showed regarding to sex and age on training satisfaction, but no significant differences were showed regarding to players’ positions、participation time and training frequency. 3. Regarding to players, also there were significant correlations among perception、 preferable of coach’s leadership behaviors and training satisfaction. 4. In perceived coach leadership behavior, caring style and rewarding style of leadership behaviors could be used to predict training satisfaction among players. Players preferred coach leadership behavior could not effectively predict training satisfaction.第壹章　緒論……………………………………………………………1 　第一節　研究背景與動機……………………………………………1 　第二節　研究目的……………………………………………………2 　第三節　研究問題……………………………………………………3 　第四節　研究假設……………………………………………………3 　第五節　研究範圍與限制……………………………………………3 　第六節　名詞解釋……………………………………………………4 第貳章　文獻探討………………………………………………………6 　第一節　教練領導行為之理論與相關研究…………………………6 　第二節　選手滿意度之理論與相關研究……………………………15 　第三節　總結…………………………………………………………22 第叁章　研究方法………………………………………………………24 　第一節　研究架構與流程……………………………………………24 　第二節　研究對象……………………………………………………26 　第三節　研究工具……………………………………………………28 　第四節　問卷編製與施測……………………………………………44 　第五節　資料處理與分析方法………………………………………45 第肆章　結果與討論……………………………………………………47 　第一節　大專軟式網球選手特質之統計分析………………………47 　第二節　不同背景變項知覺教練領導行為之整體比較與差異分析…49 　第三節　不同背景變項喜好教練領導行為之整體比較與差異分析…58 　第四節　不同背景變項對訓練滿意度之整體比較與差異分析……67 　第五節　教練領導行為與訓練滿意度之關係………………………76 第伍章　結論與建議……………………………………………………84 　第一節　結論…………………………………………………………84 　第二節　建議…………………………………………………………85 參考文獻…………………………………………………………………86 　中文部分………………………………………………………………86 　英文部分………………………………………………………………90491783 bytesapplication/pdf軟式網球;教練領導行為;訓練滿意度Soft Tennis;coach’s leadership;behaviors;training satisfactionthesis