高明峰Kao Ming-Feng2017-02-272025-07-302017-02-272017-02-27https://ir.ntus.edu.tw/handle/987654321/71033學位類別：碩士校院名稱：國立台灣體育大學系所名稱：體育研究所學號：19601006畢業學年度：99年論文頁數：84頁　　本研究目的在探討1600公尺跑走測驗、12分鐘跑走測驗及三分鐘登階測驗三種常用於檢測國中生心肺耐力測驗之差異分析，並與跑步機測VO2max做相關比較，試圖找出國中男生最適合預測VO2max之測驗方式。以七名國中八年級男生為受試者，測驗過程全程配戴Metamax 3B氣體分析器，量測各項測驗在運動中及運動後恢復期90分鐘之心跳數、心跳率、呼吸交換率、能量消耗、呼吸次數以及運動後過攝氧量（EPOC）等生理參數，先將四項測驗做運動前後之差異比較，再分析各測驗間之相互關係。研究結果顯示：一、登階測驗在運動前後之呼吸交換率無顯著差異。二、登階測驗在運動中之能量消耗、呼吸交換率及心跳率皆顯著低於1600公尺跑走及12分鐘跑走測驗。三、登階測驗恢復期呼吸次數及所測得之心肺耐力指數與VO2max無顯著相關。四、1600公尺跑走測驗在恢復期之心跳數與能量消耗顯著高於跑步機測驗及登階測驗。五、1600公尺跑走測驗在總EPOC、EPOC1及EPOC2方面，皆顯著高於12分鐘跑走測驗與登階測驗。六、1600公尺跑走測驗成績與VO2max達顯著負相關（r=-.887, p<.01）。依結果推估，登階測驗在運動強度及運動時間方面皆明顯不足，並且測得之心肺耐力指數及恢復期呼吸次數皆與VO2max無顯著相關，因此不適宜當作預測VO2max之心肺測驗，而1600公尺跑走測驗在心跳率、運動中能量消耗以及各時段累積EPOC的速度方面與跑步機測驗較具同質性，加上1600公尺跑走測驗成績與跑步機測驗所測得之VO2max具高度相關，即可解釋1600公尺跑走測驗是較適合用以檢測此階段青少年心肺耐力之測驗方式。　　The purpose of this study is to investigate the three kinds of tests as 1600-meters walk-run test, 12-min walk-run test, and three minutes step test that are used to find out difference analysis in test cardiorespiratory fitness of male junior high school students, and they are conducted of related comparison using treadmill to test VO2max, with an attempt to find out the most suitable testing method to predict VO2max for male junior high school students. For this test, 7 grade 8 students are being employed as the subjects, and they will put on Metamax 3B gas analyzer throughout the entire process to measure heart beat times, heart beat rate, respiratory exchange ratio (RER), energy consumption, respiratory times, and EPOC and other biological parameters. First, difference analysis before and after sport is conducted for these tests, and then conducted of cross relationship among each of the tests. As indicted from the research results: 1 before and after step test, there is no prominent difference for RER; 2, energy consumption, RER, and heat beat rate of step test are all prominently lower than those of 1600-meters walk-run test and 12-min walk-run test; 3. breathing times during recovery period of step test and cardiorespiratory fitness index detected are not prominently related to VO2max; 4. heart beat times during recovery period of 1600-meters walk-run test and energy consumption are prominently higher than those treadmill test and step test; 5. for 1600-meters walk-run test in holistic EPOC, EPOC1, and EPOC 2, they are clearly higher than those of 12-min walk-run test and step test; 6. score of 1600-meters walk-run test and hVO2max have prominently reached negative correlation （r=-.887, p<.01）; As estimated from the result, step test is clearly insufficient in terms of athletic intensity and sporting time, and the cardiorespiratory fitness index detected and breathing times during recovery period are not prominently related to VO2max, therefore, it is not suitable to be used as cardiorespiratory fitness test to estimate VO2max. As for 1600-meters walk-run test, its heart beat rate, energy consumption during sport, and speed and EPOC accumulated in every stage are much homogeneous to that of treadmill, in addition to the fact that score results detected from 1600-meters walk-run test and that detected from VO2max are highly correlated, it can then explain that 1600-meters walk-run test can be taken as the measures more suitable to test the cardiorespiratory fitness of youth during this stage.目　次 第一章　緒論……………………………………………………………1 　第一節　動機與背景…………………………………………………1 　第二節　研究目的……………………………………………………4 　第三節　研究假設……………………………………………………4 　第四節　研究範圍與限制……………………………………………5 　第五節　研究之重要性………………………………………………6 　第六節　名詞解釋與操作型定義……………………………………7 第二章　文獻探討………………………………………………………10 　第一節　1600公尺跑走測驗與最大攝氧量相關性之探討…………10 　第二節　12分鐘跑走測驗與最大攝氧量相關性之探討……………12 　第三節　登階測驗與最大攝氧量相關性之探討……………………13 　第四節　實驗室內測量最大攝氧量之相關研究……………………15 　第五節　評估能量消耗的方法………………………………………19 第三章　研究方法與步驟………………………………………………21 　第一節　研究架構……………………………………………………22 　第二節　研究步驟……………………………………………………23 　第三節　實驗對象與實驗時間及地點………………………………24 　第四節　實驗儀器與設備……………………………………………24 　第五節　實驗流程與步驟……………………………………………26 　第六節　資料處理與分析……………………………………………30 第四章　結果……………………………………………………………31 　第一節　研究對象之基本資料分析…………………………………31 　第二節　不同心肺功能測驗之心跳率、呼吸交換率運動中 　　　　　與恢復期前後差異比較……………………………………34 　第三節　不同心肺功能測驗整體各項生理數值之相關……………48 　第四節　最佳預測最大攝氧量之指標………………………………50 第五章　討論……………………………………………………………56 　第一節　不同心肺耐力測驗生理數值差異與相關討論……………56 　第二節　不同心肺功能測驗與最大攝氧量之相關程度……………60 　第三節　本章總結……………………………………………………63 第六章　結論與建議……………………………………………………69 　第一節　結論…………………………………………………………69 　第二節　建議…………………………………………………………71 引用文獻…………………………………………………………………722095070 bytesapplication/pdf心肺適能;運動後過攝氧量;能量消耗;1600公尺跑走測驗;登階測驗;12分鐘跑走測驗Cardiorespiratory fitness;EPOC;energy expenditure;1600-meters walk-run test;step test;12min walk-run testthesis