本研究旨在應用費德勒權變領導理論，以瞭解高雄縣國中運動代表隊教練領導型式、領導情境及領導效能現況，並探討費德勒權變領導理論與高雄縣國中運動代表隊教練領導的研究結果是否吻合。
　　為達到上述研究目的，本研究採用文獻分析法，蒐集有關費德勒「權變領導理論」的相關文獻，分析該理論並藉由問卷調查高雄縣國中運動代表隊教練之領導型式、領導情境與領導效能。
　　本研究以單因子變異數分析考驗不同年資、產生方式、任期、定位的教練其「領導型式」、及對「情境因素」「領導效能」之感受的差異情形，若差異達顯著水準，則進一步以薛費氏檢定法進行事後比較。以皮爾遜積差相關法及複迴歸分析，分別求出教練不同的領導型式、不同領導情境與領導效能的相關情形。
研究結果發現：
一、高雄縣國中運動代表隊教練之領導型式多屬於關係導向。
二、教練的基本資料與領導型式無顯著差異。
三、教練的基本資料與領導情境除得獎次數外，其餘無顯著差異。
四、教練的基本資料與領導效能除學歷外，其餘無顯著差異。
五、領導型式、領導情境與領導效能的相關並未達顯著水準。

Abstract
　　The research refers to discussing the connotation of Fiedler’s Contingency Leadership Theory, understanding the current conditions of coaches’ leadership types, leadership environment and leadership efficiency in junior high school sport team in Kaohsiung county, and discussing the application of Fiedler Contingency Leadership Theory by coaches of junior high school sport team in Kaohsiung county. According to the result of research, it will offer some detailed suggestions to the education administrative for training coaches of junior high school sport team, to schools for appointing coaches and to coaches for reference in business management in junior high school sport team. To reach the target of research, the research takes a historic data analysis method and collects some related historic data of Fiedler’s Contingency Leadership Theory to analyze and discuss the revelation and application of the theory for coaches’ leadership types, leadership condition and leadership efficiency in the junior high school sport team in Kaohsiung county.
The research takes the One-Way Anova analysis to test different seniority, creating approach, term, and the difference of appointed coaches’ “Leadership Type”, and “Leadership Efficiency” of “Situational Factors”. If the deviation reaches the significance level, it must further take Scheffe Method for the afterward comparison. . And, it takes Pearson Movement Correlation to separately find out the related conditions of the coaches’ different leadership types, different leadership situations and leadership efficiencies: Following are the main findings of this study.
1.Most coaches are Relationship-Motivated.
2.There is no significant difference found between demographic data and Leadership Type.
3.There is no significant difference found between demographic data and Situational Factors except the times of winning.
4.There is no significant difference found between demographic data and Leadership Efficiency except educational backgrounds.
5.The correlation with Leadership Type, Situational Factors and Leadership Efficiency doesn't reach the significant level.