Publication:
減少結果獲知頻率對手肘彎曲動作學習的影響

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisor趙榮瑞
dc.contributor.advisorZhao, Rong-Rui
dc.creator楊佩伶
dc.creatorYang, Pei-Ling
dc.date2010
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-22T16:26:24Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-30T15:25:08Z
dc.date.available2017-02-22T16:26:24Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-22T16:26:24Z
dc.description學位類別：碩士
dc.description校院名稱：國立台灣體育大學
dc.description系所名稱：體育研究所
dc.description學號：19601122
dc.description畢業學年度：98年
dc.description論文頁數：72頁
dc.description.abstract　　本研究的主要目的在探討結果獲知次數的降低，對於青少年手臂內移動作的學習效果。實驗將50名自願的實驗參加者（男生27名、女生23名，平均年齡14.5歲）隨機分派成100%回饋組、20%回饋組、10%回饋組、寬帶回饋組與寬帶相對組等，操作Biometrics E-Link手肘彎曲57度的動作學習，在100次獲得期的動作練習後，進行立即保留測驗與延遲保留測驗，每一位實驗參加者也在獲得後進行41度的立即遷移測驗與延遲遷移測驗。Biometrics E-Link記錄的每次手肘彎曲角度則用以計算恆常誤差、絕對誤差、整體誤差、變異誤差和變異誤差係數等誤差指標，並以5（組別）× 2（測驗）混合設計二因子變異數分析與Duncan法事後比較進行統計分析。保留測驗的結果顯示變異誤差沒有組別的差異（p > .05），立即保留測驗的變異誤差則顯著低於延遲保留測驗（p < .05）；在立即保留階段的恆常誤差則顯示100%回饋組顯著高於其他實驗組別（p < .05），延遲保留測驗的恆常誤差則沒有組別間的顯著差異（p > .05）。不同回饋組別間在遷移測驗則沒有統計的顯著差異（p > .05）。研究發現過多的結果獲知回饋頻率對於青少年的手臂內移動作學習僅為表現變項，降低回饋頻率的手段中，固定結果獲知給予（寬帶相對組與低相對回饋頻率）和漸褪式的寬帶回饋均有助於動作學習。
dc.description.abstract　　The purpose of this study was to investigate the learning effect of elbow flexion movement through the various manipulations of the reduced knowledge of results (KR) for adolescent. Fifty voluntary participants, 23 female and 27 male (mean age = 14.5 years), were assigned randomly to 100 percent KR frequency group, 20 percent KR frequency group, 10 percent KR frequency group, performance-based bandwidth group, and the control group of performance-based bandwidth. All participants were asked to operate and to learn the Biometrics E-Link system for 57 degrees of elbow flexion. After 100 trails of acquisition, every participant was assessed the learning effects by immediate retention test, delay retention test, 41 degrees of elbow flexion immediate transfer test, and 41 degrees of elbow flexion delay transfer test. The angle of elbow flexion was acquired by Biometrics E-Link system and was used to calculate the error scores: constant error, absolute error, total variability, variable error, and coefficient of variable error. 5 (group) × 2 (test) Mixed-design two way ANOVA and Duncan post-hoc comparison were used to test the statistical difference. The results of retention test showed there was no groups difference for variable error (p > .05), but the immediate retention test was lower than delay retention test (p < .05). The constant error of 100 percent KR frequency group was the largest in immediate retention test (p < .05), but there were no group difference in delay retention test (p > .05). There were no group differences for transfer test (p > .05). It indicated that high KR frequency was the performance variable for the adolescent to acquisition the skill of elbow flexion. For the techniques of reduce augmented feedback frequency, the constant to provide KR (the control group of performance-based bandwidth and the groups of lower KR frequency) and the fading technique (performance-based bandwidth group) were benefit for motor learning.
dc.description.tableofcontents目　次 中文摘要…………………………………………………………………Ⅰ 英文摘要…………………………………………………………………Ⅱ 謝誌………………………………………………………………………Ⅲ 目錄………………………………………………………………………Ⅳ 圖目錄……………………………………………………………………Ⅵ 表目錄……………………………………………………………………Ⅶ 第壹章　緒論 　第一節　研究背景……………………………………………………1 　第二節　研究目的……………………………………………………5 　第三節　研究問題……………………………………………………5 　第四節　研究假設……………………………………………………6 　第五節　研究範圍與限制……………………………………………6 　第六節　詞解釋與操作型定義………………………………………7 第貳章　文獻探討 　第一節　回饋之類型與機制…………………………………………14 　第二節　回饋頻率及引導假說………………………………………18 　第三節　不同回饋頻率的結果獲知對學習效果影響………………22 　第四節　本章總結……………………………………………………25 第叄章　研究方法與步驟 　第一節　研究架構……………………………………………………26 　第二節　研究對象……………………………………………………27 　第三節　研究工具……………………………………………………27 　第四節　研究流程……………………………………………………28 　第五節　研究方法與程序……………………………………………29 　第六節　資料處理……………………………………………………30 第肆章　結果與討論 　第一節　各階段保留測驗的描述統計資料…………………………31 　第二節　各階段遷移測驗的描述統計資料…………………………41 　第三節　綜合討論……………………………………………………51 第伍章　結論與建議 　第一節　結論…………………………………………………………60 　第二節　建議…………………………………………………………61 引用文獻 一、中文部份……………………………………………………………63 二、英文部份……………………………………………………………69
dc.format.extent466567 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ntus.edu.tw/handle/987654321/70908
dc.languagezh-TW
dc.publisher體育研究所
dc.relation.isbasedon一、中文部分： 王秋容（1995）。結果獲知與表現獲知對運動技能學習的影響。未出版碩士論文，國立台灣師範大學，台北市。 李惠加（1997）。青少年發展。台北市：心理。 林清山（1992）。心理與教育統計學。台北市：東華書局。 林德隆（1995）。外在回饋對運動技能的影響。中華體育，9(2)，67-72。 林家屏（2002）。青少年自我概念與行為困擾之相關研究。未出版碩士論文，國立成功大學，台南市。 周宏室（1994）。Mosston (摩斯登)教學光譜的理論與應用。台北市：師大。 范春源（1993)。從運動技能學習的觀點談國小體育教學。台灣省學校體育，17，8-11 頁。 胡明霞（2003）。動作控制與動作學習。台北市：金名圖書。 陳新燕、卓俊伶（1997）。示範者結果獲知的相對頻率對觀察者動作學習的影響。大專體育學刊，1，131-138。 陳新燕（1997）。示範者結果獲知的相對頻率對觀察者動作學習的影響。未出版碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學，台北市。 陳玉芬（1998）。特定範圍內結果獲知的精確程度對動作學習的影響。未出版碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學，台北市。 陳玉芬、卓俊伶（1998）。特定範圍結果獲知對高爾夫球推桿動作之空間準確性與錯誤偵察的影響。體育學報，25，249-258。 陳淑娟（2000）。國中學生行為困擾、求助態度與求助偏好之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。 陳俊汕（2000)。從運動技能學習的觀點談體育教學。台灣體育，109 ，49-54 頁。 張春秀（1998)。動作技能學習的階段與教學注意事項。台灣省學校體育，48，43-47頁。 許秀貞（2004）。不同外在回饋形態對游泳自由式學習與保留的影響【摘要】。93學年度台灣運動心理學年會暨學術研討會海報發表，嘉義縣。 黃德祥（1998）。青少年發展與輔導。台北市：五南。 溫麗香、林玉瓊（2003）。合作學習教學法在學校舞蹈教學上的應用。大專體育，69，21-26。 蔡秀桃（1984）。結果的獲知對壘球低手投擲準確性的影響。未出版碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學，台北市。 蔡貴枝、劉淑燕、陳信良、黃珍鈺（2004）。帶狀回饋安排應用在羽球發球之研究【摘要】。93學年度台灣運動心理學年會暨學術研討會海報發表，嘉義縣。 廖邦玲（2004）。結果獲知對羽球技能學習之影響。未出版碩士論文，國立臺灣體育學院，台中市。 饒蘭君（1995）。目標設定理論在籃球投籃技能教學上之驗證性研究。台北市：中儀科技圖書出版社。 二、英文部分： Adams,J .A. (1971).A closed - loop theory of motor learning .Journal of Motor Behavior,3 ,111-150 . Adams,J. A. ,Goetz,E. T. & Marshall,P. H. （1972）. Response feedback and motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 391-397. Bilodeau, I. M.（1966）.Information feedback. In E. A. Bilodeau（Ed.）.Acquisition of skill（pp.255-296）. New York: Academic Press. Boyce, B. A.（1991）. The effects of an instructional strategy with two schedules of augmented KP feedback upon skill acquistion of an selevted shooting task. Journal of teaching in physical education, 11, 47-58. Brisson , T. A. & Alain, C.（1997）. A comparison of References for using Knowledge of Performance in Learning a Motor Task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29, 339-350. Chew, R. A. (1976 ). Verbal.visual. & kinesthetic error feedback and the learning of a simple motor task. Research Quarterly 47,254-259. Drowatzky, J. N. (1975).Winner：From motor learning principles & practices . Homewood, IL：Burgess Publishing. Eghan, T. (1988). The relation of teacher feedback to student achievement in learning selected tennis skills. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiand State University,Baton Rouge. Gentile, A.M.（1972）.A working model of skill acquisition with application to teaching.Quest, 17, 3-23. Gill, D. L.（1975）.Knowledge of results precision and motor skill acquisition. Journal of Motor Behavior, 7,191-198. Goodwin, J. E. & Meeuwsen, H. J.（1995）. Using bandwidth knowledge of results to alter relative frequencies during motor skill acquisition. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 66, 99-104. Graydon, J., Paine, L., Ellis, C., & Threadgold, R.（1997）. Comparison of bandwidth knowledge of results and the relative frequency effect In learning a discrete motor skill. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 32, 15-28. Jensen, B. E., Picado, M. E., & Morenz, C.（1981）. Effects of precision of knowledge of results on performance of a gross motor coincidence-anticipation task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 13, 9-17. Kernodle,M.W.,& Carlton ,L .G .(1992).Information feedbackand the learning of ultiple-degree-of-freedom activities.Journal of Motor Behavior,24 ,187-195. Little, W. S., & McCullagh, P.（1989）. Motivation orientation and modeled instruction strategies: The effects on form and accuracy. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 11, 41-53. Lee, A. M., Keh, N. C., & Magill, R. A.（1993）.Instructional effects of teacher’s feedback in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 12, 228-243. Lee, T. D., & Maraj, K. V.（1994）.Effects of bandwidth goals and bandwidth knowledge of results on motor learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65,44-249. Lee, T. D., Swinnen, & Serrien, D. J.（1994）.Cognitive effort and motor learning. Quest, 46,328-344. Lai, Q., & Shea, C. H. (1999). The role of reduced frequency of knowledge of results during constant practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70(1), 33-40. Magill,R.A.（1998）Motor Learning : Concepts and applications（5th ed.）. New York:McGraw-hill. Ne-well，1974 Newell, K. M., Morris, L. R., & Scully, D. M. (1985). Augmented information and the acquisition of skill in physical activity. In R. L. Terjung ( Ed. ), Exercise and Sport Science Reviews (Vol. 13, pp. 235-261 ). Lexington, MA: Collamore Press. Rose, D. J. (1997）. A multilevel approach to the study of motor control and learning.Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Smoll, F. L.（1972）.Effects of precision of information feedback upon acquisition of a motor skill. Research Quarterly, 43, 489-493. Schmidt, R. A. (1975）. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260. Shapiro, D. C.（1977）. Knowledge of results and motor learning in preschool children. Research Quarterly, 48, 154-158. Salmoni (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning : A review and Critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95 (3), 355-.386. Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355-386. Schmidt, R .A .(1988)Motor control and earning:Abehavioral emphasis.Champaign,IL :Human Kinetics. Swinnen, S. P., Schmidt, R. A., Nicholson, D. E., & Shapiro, D.C. (1990). Information feedback for skillacquisition: Instantaneous knowledge of results degrades learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, 16, 706-716. Swinnen, S. P.(1990).Interpolated activities during the knowledge-of-results delay and post-knowledge-of-results interval: Effects of performance and learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,memory,and cognition, 16, 762-702. Schmidt, R. A., (1991). Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor neuroscience (pp. 59-75). Dordrecht: Klyuwer. Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigm suggest new concept for training. Psychological Science, 3, 207-217. Swinnen, S. P. （1996）. Information feedback for motor skill learning: A review. In H. N.Zelaznik（Ed）, Advances in motor learning and control（pp.37-66）. Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics. Schmidt, R. A. (1989). Motor control and learning :A behavioral emphasis (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human kinetics. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (1999).Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis(3ed). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Schmidt,R.A., & Wrisberg, C. A.（2000）.Motor learning and performance（2ed.）.Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Wallace, S. A., & Hagler, R.W.（1979）.Knowledge of performance and the learning of closed motor skill. Research Quaterly, 50, 265-271. Wright, D. L., Snowden, S., & Willougby, D. (1990). Summary KR: Howmuch information is used from the summary? Journal of Human Movemednt Studies, 19, 119-128. Winstein, C. J. & Schmidt, R. A. (1990). Reduced frequency of knoeledge of results enhances moto skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: learning, memory,and cognition, 4, 677-691. Wulf, G, Shea, C. H., & Matschiner, S. (1998). Frequent feedback enhances complex motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30(2), 180-192. Wulf, G, Schmidt, R. A., & Deubel, (1993). Reduced feedback frequencies enhances generalized motor program learning but not parameterization learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, 19(5), 1134-1150. Young, D. E.（1988）. Knowledge of performance and motor learning.Unpulished doctoral dissertation, Universuty of California,Los Angeles. Young,D .L., & Schmidt,R .A .(1992)Augmented feedback for enhanced skill acquisition.In G .E .Stelmach & J .Requin(Eds.)Tutorials in motor ehavior (pp.677-693) Zecker, S. G. （1982）. Mental practice and Knowledge of results in the learning of a perceptual motor skill. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 52-63.
dc.subject青少年;動作學習;擴增性回饋;結果獲知
dc.subjectAdolescent;Motor learning;Augmented feedback;Knowledge of result
dc.title減少結果獲知頻率對手肘彎曲動作學習的影響
dc.titleEFFECTS OF REDUCED FREQUENCY OF KNAWLEDGE OF RESULTS ON THE LEARNING OF ELBOW FLEXION MOVEMENT
dc.typethesis
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
000001101.pdf
Size:
455.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

學位論文(103學年度之前)