Publication:

應用德爾菲法建構國內棒球場分級制度之研究

本研究目的旨在建構棒球場分級制度，經由文獻探討歸納出兩大面向：軟硬體設施、經營管理，七個子面向：行政空間、運動服務空間、運動觀賞空間、棒球場空間、其他設備、興建與經營模式及經營策略，共51項指標，並分為甲乙丙丁戊5級，製作德爾菲專家問卷，以11位學者專家組成德爾菲專家小組，針對棒球場空間模式及指標之適切性作批判，進行三回合的德爾菲問卷調查。研究結果顯示，棒球場分級制度甲級棒球場重要性指標共78項、乙級棒球場重要性指標共56項、丙級棒球場重要性指標共26項、丁級棒球場重要性指標共14項、戊級棒球場重要性指標共11項。根據研究結果提出以下建議：一、參考本研究棒球場分級制度，釐清現行管理單位及租用相關資訊並做通盤檢討與整理，爾後將相關資訊在網站上公布以供民眾查詢；二、廣設本研究丙、丁、戊等級簡易棒球場，使民眾在從事棒壘球運動時不因場地問題而有所阻礙，並配合國家相關計畫，成立社區棒球隊，讓對棒球運動有興趣之學生或民眾參與；三、本研究利用文獻分析及德爾菲問卷依據11位專家學者的意見建立棒球場分級制度，並未實際實施於棒球場地上，恐有不完整之虞，建議未來研究者能依據本研究棒球場分級制度實際實施所發生之問題作修正，建構更完整的棒球場分級制度。

This paper aimes to construct a grading system for domestic baseball field. The research is done by reviewing related literature through two main directions—software and hardware facilities, as well as seven sub-categories in administrative space, service space, watching space, baseball court, other facilities, building and operation model, and management strategies. There are 51 indicators in the making of the Delphi method questionnaire, and the results are separated into five grades. Eleven scholars and experts participated in the Delphi experts group. The main task of the three expert groups was to evaluate and judge the applicability of indicators. After three rounds of responses, there are 78 important indicators in the first grade, 56 indicators in the second grade, 26 indicators in the third grade, 14 indicators in the forth grade, and 11 indicators in the fifth grade. According to the questionnaire results, this paper provides with the following suggestions. First, when categorizing baseball fields, one should refer to the grading system created by this study, which helps to identify the current administrators and clarify rental information. The result should be made available on the Internet for future reference. Second, the government should widely promote the construction of the third, forth, and fifth grade types of baseball fields, so that the general public can enjoy baseball and softball easily as recreational activities. Lastly, this paper attempts to create a baseball field grading system in Taiwan by reviewing related literature and the Delphi method questionnaire by the Delphi group, however, the study is by no means a comprehensive one. Future research and studies can be done to perfect the suggestions made by this paper, which would contribute to the refinement of the baseball field grading system of Taiwan.