本研究的目的在於對「運動認定量表中文版」（謝沛書，2004）的因素結構進行驗證，並以個體的身體活動量為效標，檢驗其建構效度。研究參與者為18至60歲之一般民眾共450位，以線性結構模式對運動認定量表中文版的假設性測量模式進行適配度的考驗，結果發現該模式的整體適配度不佳。後來改以每個因素中因素負荷量最高的前四個觀察變項，且變項的因素負荷量達0.6以上為標準，提出假設性測量模式二，並以線性結構模式驗證其因素結構，結果發現該模式能夠適配於實際的資料，其結構包括了正面情緒、負面情緒/排他性、運動員認定、重要性等四個因素。另外以「國際身體活動量表台灣中文版」（劉影梅，2004）為效標，檢驗其建構效度，結果發現到修正後的運動認定量表結構能夠預測個體的身體活動量，對身體活動量的預測力為19﹪（校正後為18﹪），其中有顯著貢獻的預測變項為正面情緒及負面情緒/排他性。顯示了修正後的運動認定量表結構有良好的建構效度，能做為瞭解個體運動認定程度的有效測量工具。

Abstract
　　The purpose of this study was to confirm the factorial structure of “Athletic and Exercise Identities Scale”(Pei-Shu Hsieh, 2004) and examine it’s construct by using magnitude of physical activities as criterion. Four hundred and fifty individuals aged from 18 to 60 participated in the study. Linear Structural Relationship（LISREL）was used to test the goodness of fit between hypothetical model and observed data proposed. Results showed that the model did not fit the data. The model was then modified by choosing only the highest four observed variables of from those factors had loadings of 0.6 or above. Analysis showed that the modified model fit the data significantly with four factors: positive affect, exclusivity/ negative affect, athlete identity, and importance. Construct validity was then examined using the scores of “International Physical Activity Questionnaire Taiwan Version”(Ying-Mei Liu, 2004) as criterion. It was found that the modified model predicted the magnitude of physical activity up to 19﹪（18﹪adjusted）, and the most significant contribution came from positive affect and exclusivity/ negative affect. According to the results, the modified version of “Athletic and Exercise Identities Scale” seemed to be an effective tool for measuring individual’s degree of exercise identity.