Publication:

軟式網球女子雙打比賽技術型態與得分之研究~以96年全國運動會女子個人雙打前八強分析~

本研究旨在探討女子軟式網球雙打比賽，技術型態內容為：得分技術、得失分陣型與接發球路線區域，對前、後衛（得分）及名次之影響。以96年全國運動會女子個人雙打前八強為研究對象，藉由攝影紀錄獲得相關數據，將所得資料以統計方法：描述統計—（次數分配、百分比、平均數）、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數，進行分析。

獲致研究結果如下：

一、96年全國運動會女子軟式網球雙打比賽中前八名以「正手拍」擊球為主要得分技術佔37%，後衛（28％）前衛（9％）有明顯差異（p<.05），前四名與後四名組正手拍也達顯著水準（p<.05），為最常用得分技術。其次為「接發球」佔15％，「正手高壓殺球」佔13％，「發球」佔11％。前四名後前衛主要得分技術差別為:後衛集中在--正手拍>接發球>發球>反手拍。前衛的主要得分技術集中在--正手高壓殺球>正手拍>正手截擊>反手截擊。

二、統計分析顯示整體前、後衛得分陣形在正對角雁行陣穿越球、左直線雁形陣穿越球達顯著差異水準（p<.05）前四名與後四名組在正對角雁行陣、逆對角雁行陣、守備型並形陣、右直線雁形陣穿越球、左直線雁形陣穿越球等五個陣形呈顯著性差異水準（p<.05）。前四名後衛得分陣形集中在: 正對角雁行陣41分佔百分25 ％；逆對角雁行陣39分佔百分24 ％；左直線雁形陣18分佔11％；守備型並形陣17分佔10％；對勝負有決定的影響。前四名前衛得分陣形集中在: 正對角雁行陣44分佔百分28 ％；逆對角雁行陣35分佔百分22 ％；守備型並形陣35分佔22％；右直線雁形陣20分佔13％，左直線雁形陣13分佔8％；得知後、前衛運用最多的得分陣形為正對角雁行陣跟逆對角雁行陣為主。

三、整體後、前衛接發球路線還是以五區及八區中線及七區底線之間為主要接發球路線，統計分析顯示出前四名後四名組在5區、8區、7區接發球路線區域有顯著水準差異（p<.05）。接發球路線區前四名組的路線區也集中5區、8區、7區名次跟接發球路線區呈顯著相關。

四、整體失分陣形後、前衛在逆對角雁行陣穿越球、右直線雁行陣穿越球達到顯著性差異水準數（p<.05）。前衛失分明顯大於後衛。失分最多的陣形是：正對角雁形陣139次佔33％，逆對角雁形陣113次佔27％，失分比例最高佔60％，再來是右直線雁行陣14％、左直線雁行陣14％。合計共88％。前四名與後四名後衛在逆對角雁行陣失分達顯著性差異水準（p<.05）；前四名後衛在右直線雁行陣也呈顯著差異（p<.05）、前四名與後四名前衛在正對角雁行陣、逆對角雁行陣、右直線雁行陣呈顯著性差異水準；前四名後、前衛在失分陣形>後四名後前衛達顯著水準。

The purpose of this research is to tvaluate the influence of the technical scoring, scoring and missing formation, and the line area on the ranking and the scoring of front and rear guard in female soft type tennis doubles match. The vidio record of first eight ranking teams in the women's doubles soft tennis on scoring focus to first eight ranks in women's doubles soft tennis game of national games, 2007 were collected. The data was analyzed with the statistic tools such as percentage, description statistics, T-Test, and single factor variance.

The main findings are as below:

1. In 2007 National Athletic Games, female soft type tennis doubles match, the “forehand hitting” is the most effective scoring technique, accounting for a percentage of 37%. There were significant difference (p<.05) on the rear and front guard. “Receiving” takes 15% scoring, “Forehand Smashing”, 13%, and “Serving”, 11%. The scoring techniques for the first four places were different. The rear guard applied the strategies of “Forehand,” “Receiving”, “Serving”, and “Reserve”; however, the fore guard employed the techniques of “Forehand smashing”, “Forehand”, “Forehand Volley” and “Reverse Volley.”

2. On the Whole Scoring formation, the statistic data presented that “Opposite angle Up-and Back Formation” takes 27% of 118 points; “Counter Opposite angle Up-and Back Formation” takes 21% of 91 points; Double Bottom Line takes 16% out of 66 points; Right Straight Up-and Back Formation takes 11% out of 47 points, and Left Straight Up-and Back Formation takes 10% out of 44 points.

The rear guards of the first four places scoring mainly on the “Opposite angle Up-and Back Formation” taking 41points, a 25% share; “Counter Opposite angle Up-and Back Formation” taking 39points, 24%; Double Bottom Line taking 66 points, 11%; and Left Straight Up-and Back Formation taking 17 points, 10%.  These strategies decisively influenced the results.

The fore guards of the first four places scoring mainly on the “Opposite angle Up-and Back Formation” taking 44points, a 28% share; “Counter Opposite angle Up-and Back Formation” taking 35 points, 22%; Double Bottom Line taking 35 points, 22%; and Left Straight Up-and Back Formation taking 13 points, 8%. These strategies decisively influenced the results. These tactics are very decisive to the rankings; therefore, the mutual interaction, communication, and cooperation of the partners are actually an important formation, which should be fostered in the training process.

3. As a whole, the main receiving lines of the front and rear guards were focused on the middle line of the 5th zone and the 8th zone, and the bottom line of the 7th zone. The whole lines were respective on : 1 area 4%, 2 area 2%, 3 area 2%, 4 area 12%, 5 area 20%, 6 area 11%, 7 area 15%, 8 area 17%, 9 area 11%, 10 area vanguards attack ball 6%. Receiving lines of the first four group concentrate in the 5th zone, the 8th zone, and the 7th zone. There was significant difference（p<.05）on the serving zone of the first four places and the last four places. This presented a positive relation between ranking and the serving zone

4. The formation of losing points were mainly on the “Opposite angle Up-and Back Formation”, taking a 33% share with a 139 loses; “Counter Opposite angle Up-and Back Formation” taking 27%, 133 times. The losing percentage was 66%.

Second was Right Straight Up-and Back Formation taking 14%; Left up and back formation, 14%, accounting for a total 88%. These four formations are the key to losing points. The opposite angle formation and the counter angle formation contribute to the most losing points, which is similar to the result of the formation to scoring. Collectively,to nin ant avvid losing point, these two formations were the most critical strategies.They play an important role on the winning.