本研究旨在瞭解教練領導行為與訓練滿意度二者間的相關關係；進而探討教練領導行為是否對訓練滿意度有預測力。以大專校院軟式網球甲組男、女選手為研究對象。根據調查所蒐集之資料，經描述統計、項目分析、因素分析、單因子變異數分析、相關分析、多元逐步迴歸分析等統計方法，結果歸納如下：
一、選手在知覺與喜好教練領導行為上，以團隊行為最高，而專制行為最低；性別、訓練天數及最高成就有顯著差異，其餘皆沒有顯著差異。
二、選手對訓練滿意度，以教練專業能力最高，而場地與設施最低；性別及年齡對訓練滿意度有顯著差異，其餘皆沒有顯著差異。
三、教練領導行為與訓練滿意度二者間有明顯的相關關係。
四、知覺教練領導行為中，以關懷及獎勵行為二個構面能有效的預測訓練滿意度；而喜好教練領導行為則無法有效預測訓練滿意度。

　　The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of soft tennis coach’s leadership behaviors and training satisfaction. Another purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship among perception、preferable of coach’s leadership behaviors and training satisfaction. Also, the effects of perception and preferable of coach’s leadership behaviors on prediction of training satisfaction was investigate by this study. Questions in the questionnaires were developed by researcher. Descriptive statistics、item analysis、factor analysis、correlation analysis and multi-regression analysis were the statistical methods used to analyze this study. From the results of the study, several conclusions were made in below:
1. Regarding to the perceived and preferable coach’s leadership behaviors on the players, the top one was team behavior, with authoritarian behavior being the lowest one. Significant differences were showed regarding to sex、training frequency and most high achievement on the perceived coach’s leadership behaviors.
2. Regarding to the attitude toward training satisfaction of the college soft tennis players, the top one was coach’s professional ability with facilities and equipment being the lowest ones. Significant differences were showed regarding to sex and age on training satisfaction, but no significant differences were showed regarding to players’ positions、participation time and training frequency.
3. Regarding to players, also there were significant correlations among perception、 preferable of coach’s leadership behaviors and training satisfaction.
4. In perceived coach leadership behavior, caring style and rewarding style of leadership behaviors could be used to predict training satisfaction among players. Players preferred coach leadership behavior could not effectively predict training satisfaction.