Low-Level Laser Therapy Facilitates Postcontraction Recovery with Ischemic Preconditioning

PurposeDespite early development of muscle fatigue, ischemic preconditioning is gaining popularity for strength training combined with low-load resistance exercise. This study investigated the effect of low-level laser (LLL) on postcontraction recovery with ischemic preconditioning.MethodsForty healthy adults (22.9 & PLUSMN; 3.5 yr) were allocated into sham (11 men, 9 women) and LLL (11 men, 9 women) groups. With ischemic preconditioning, they were trained with three bouts of intermittent wrist extension of 40% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). During the recovery period, the LLL group received LLL (wavelength of 808 nm, 60 J) on the working muscle, whereas the sham group received no sham therapy. MVC, force fluctuations, and discharge variables of motor units (MU) for a trapezoidal contraction were compared between groups at baseline (T0), postcontraction (T1), and after-recovery (T2).ResultsAt T2, the LLL group exhibited a higher normalized MVC (T2/T0; 86.22% & PLUSMN; 12.59%) than that of the sham group (71.70% & PLUSMN; 13.56%; P = 0.001). The LLL group had smaller normalized force fluctuations (LLL, 94.76% & PLUSMN; 21.95%; sham, 121.37% & PLUSMN; 29.02%; P = 0.002) with greater normalized electromyography amplitude (LLL, 94.33% & PLUSMN; 14.69%; sham, 73.57% & PLUSMN; 14.94%; P < 0.001) during trapezoidal contraction. In the LLL group, the smaller force fluctuations were associated with lower coefficients of variation of interspike intervals of MUs (LLL, 0.202 & PLUSMN; 0.053; sham, 0.208 & PLUSMN; 0.048; P = 0.004) with higher recruitment thresholds (LLL, 11.61 & PLUSMN; 12.68 %MVC; sham, 10.27 & PLUSMN; 12.73 %MVC; P = 0.003).ConclusionsLLL expedites postcontraction recovery with ischemic preconditioning, manifesting as superior force generation capacity and force precision control for activation of MU with a higher recruitment threshold and lower discharge variability.