Publication:
銀髮族的平衡與步態檢測工具本土化之研究

dc.contributor.advisor趙叔蘋
dc.contributor.advisorChao, Shu-Ping
dc.creator謝豐宇
dc.creatorHsieh, Feng-Yu
dc.date2003
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-22T15:18:11Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-30T15:18:08Z
dc.date.available2017-02-22T15:18:11Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-22T15:18:11Z
dc.description學位類別:碩士
dc.description校院名稱:國立臺灣體育學院
dc.description系所名稱:休閒運動管理研究所
dc.description畢業學年度:91年
dc.description論文頁數:82頁
dc.description.abstract中文摘要   本研究主要是在探討對銀髮族平衡與步態之檢測工具―Tinetti Assessment Tool本土化後於施測時,不同背景之評分者間所評出之差異性,並以台中市北區老年人為研究對象。資料回收後是以SPSS 10.0版分別進行描述統計、單因子變異數分析、Kendall和諧係數、t-test、雙因子變異數分析、Pearson相關及多元迴歸分析等統計方法進行資料處理。 本研究共分為兩個階段:第一階段結果發現:無論在平衡部分或步態部分,3組評分者的評分均無顯著差異,而且3組評分者對7位受試者評分的可信度相當一致。第二階段發現:不同居住情形、不同目前行走狀況及有無患有疾病與檢測得分有顯著差異,即獨居老年人在步態得分優於與家人同住者、不需輔助器者在平衡與步態得分上均優於使用柺杖者、沒有罹患疾病者在步態得分上優於患有疾病者。另外,與家人住且需要柺杖者、現在沒有運動且患有疾病四者其平衡(11)、步態(11)和總分(22)得分最低。各自變項中以目前行走狀況對平衡、步態及總分得分有較大的預測力。
dc.description.abstractAbstract   The purpose of this study was to probe into the grading differences among graders from different backgrounds when the elderly’ balance and gait assessment tool, the Tinetti Assessment Tool, is employed domestically. The elderly living in northern Tai-Chung, Taiwan were sampled as study population. All the collected data were processed and analyzed by employing computational and statistical programs, which include descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, Kendall’s coefficient of concordance, t-test, two-way ANOVA, Pearson correlations, and stepwise regression analysis under the SPSS 10.0 version. This study was divided into two stages. The first stage was to show that there were no distinct differences in the grading results of balance and gait from the three groups of graders. Meanwhile, the credibility of the evaluations on the seven testees was identical among all three groups of graders. In the second stage, obvious differences of assessment result can be detected among elders from different backgrounds. These backgrounds can be categorized into three categories: different living environments, difference in walking ability, and different degrees of healthiness. Independent elders who were living alone scored better on the gait assessment than those who were living with their families. Elders who did not need walking assistance of any kind scored better on both balance and gait assessment than those who used cane or other assistant devices. Healthy elders scored better on gait than those who were ill. In addition, among the tested population, those who used walking assistant devices while living with families and those who lacked exercise while being ill at the same time scored the lowest on balance (11), gait (11), and total score (22). When it came to independent testing, the current walking ability of the elders possessed higher predictability in the scores of balance, gait, and total score.
dc.description.tableofcontents目 次 第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………1  第一節 研究背景與動機…………………………………………1  第二節 研究目的…………………………………………………4  第三節 研究問題…………………………………………………5  第四節 研究假設…………………………………………………6  第五節 名詞解釋…………………………………………………6 第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………………8  第一節 造成銀髮族跌倒的主要因素……………………………8  第二節 銀髮族的平衡與步態之重要性…………………………10  第三節 平衡與步態之相關研究…………………………………12  第四節 Tinetti Assessment Tool之相關探討………………………14 第三章 研究方法與步驟……………………………………………19  第一節 研究設計…………………………………………………19  第二節 研究對象…………………………………………………22  第三節 研究工具…………………………………………………23  第四節 研究流程…………………………………………………24  第五節 資料處理與分析…………………………………………27 第四章研究結果與討論………………………………………………28  第一節 第一階段研究對象基本資料……………………………28  第二節 土化後檢測工具信度之探討……………………………30  第三節 第二階段研究對象基本資料……………………………32  第四節 個人背景因素與檢測得分之分析………………………38  第五節 個人背景因素間與檢測得分之相關分析………………48  第六節 個人背景因素與檢測得分之多元迴歸分析……………55  第七節 綜合討論…………………………………………………58 第五章 結論與建議…………………………………………………64  第一節 結論………………………………………………………64  第二節 建議………………………………………………………67  第三節 後續研究…………………………………………………68 參考文獻………………………………………………………………70
dc.format.extent223334 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ntus.edu.tw/handle/987654321/70516
dc.languagezh-TW
dc.publisher休閒運動管理研究所
dc.relation.isbasedon參考文獻 一、中文部分 王如弘(民91)。台灣老人害怕跌倒評估量表發展與初步信效度檢測。私立長庚大學護理學研究所碩士論文。 石佑翎(民91)。長期照護機構工作取向行走訓練成效研究。國立台灣大學物理治療研究所碩士論文。 行政院經濟建設委員會(民91)。中華民國台灣地區民國91年至140年人口推計。「線上查詢:http://www.cepd.gov. tw/indexset/indexcontent.jsp?topno=1&linkid=8」。(91.7.15) 林志杰(民85)。半側偏癱瘓者步行前的動靜態平衡訓練及評估。國立成功大學醫學工程研究所碩士論文。 林佳貞(民91)。不完全脊髓損傷患者之下肢肌力及肌張力與步態表現之相關性。國立陽明大學物理治療研究所碩士論文。 胡立仕(民91)。老年人運動行為之研究。國立台灣師範大學運動休閒與管理研究所碩士論文。 陳全壽(民90)。老人的肌肉與肌力訓練。國民體育季刊,30(2),21-29。 張旭銘(民82)。腳踝扭傷者站立平衡能力之探討。私立中山醫學院醫學研究所碩士論文。 黃世旭(民84)。青年與老年人之三維步態分析。國立陽明大學醫學工程研究所碩士論文。 葉育志(民91)。應用於步行復健之智慧型感測控制輔助系統。國立中正大學電機工程研究所碩士論文。 楊家榮(民90)。動態平衡評估系統之研發。國立陽明大學醫學工程研究所碩士論文。 趙叔蘋(民91)。防範銀髮族跌倒之運動計畫。國立臺灣體育學院學報,12,195-210。 謝穎慧、李美玲(民90)。社區人口老化變遷。台灣老年醫學會。 二、外文部分 Ander, R. O., & Anderson, D. J. (1980). Designing a better postural measurement system. American Journal of Otolryngology, 1(3), 197-206. Burns, N., & Grove, S. K. (1997). The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique, & utilization (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co. Campbell, A. J., Borrie, M. J., Spears, G. F. (1989). Risk factors for falls in a community-based prospective study of people 70 years and older. Journal of the Gerontology, 44(4), 112-117. Chandler, J. M., Duncan, P. W., & Studenski, S. A. (1990). Balance performance on the postural stress test: Comparison of young adults,healthy elderly, and fallers. Physical Therapy, 70(6), 410-415. Hauer, K., Rost, B., Rutschle, K., Opitz, H., Specht, N., Bartsch, P., Oster, P., Schlierf, G. (2001). Exercise training for rehabilitation and secondary prevention of falls in geriatric patients with a history of injurious falls. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 49(1), 10-20. John Young, Katrina Donaldson, (2001). Community hospitals and people. Age and Aging, 30(S-3), 7-10. Marion E. T. McMurdo, (2001). Falls prevention. Age and Aging, 30(S-1), 4-6. Nashner, L. M., Woollacott, M., & Tuma, G. (1979). Organization of rapid respindes to postural and locomotor-like perturbations of standing man. Brain Research, 36(3), 463-476. O’Loughlin, J. L., Robitaille, Y., & Boivvin, J.-F. et al.(1993). Incidence of and risk for falls and injurious falls among the community-dwelling elderly. American Journal of Epidemiology, 173(3), 342-354. Tideiksaar, R. (1986). Preventing falls: Home hazard hecklists to help older patients protect themselves. Geriatrics, 41(5), 26-28. Tinetti, M. E., Baker, D. I., Garrett, P. A., Gottschalk, M., Koch, M. L., Horwitz, R. I. (1993). Yale Ficsit: Risk factor abatement strategy for fall prevention. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 41(3), 315-320. Tinetti, M. E. (1986). Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problem in elderly patients. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 34(2), 119-126. Tinetti, M. E., Speechley, M., Ginter, S. F. (1988). Risk factor for falls among elderly persons living in the community. The New England Journal of Medicine, 319(26), 1701-1707. Tinetti, M. E., Richman, D., Powell, L. (1990). Falls efficacy as a measure of fear of falling. Journal of the Gerontology, 45(6), 239-243. Tinetti, M. E., Williams, T. F., Mayewski, R. (1986). Falls risk index for elderly patients based on number of chronic disabilities. The American Journal of Medicine, 80(3), 429-434. U.S. Census Bureau. http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/ p95-01-1.pdf (2002.11.04)
dc.subject步態;檢測工具;平衡
dc.subjectTinetti Assessment Tool;balance;gait;assessment tool
dc.title銀髮族的平衡與步態檢測工具本土化之研究
dc.titleTHE STUDY OF THE LOCALIZATION OF BALANCE AND GAIT ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR THE ELDERLY ― FOCUS ON TINETTI ASSESSMENT TOOL
dc.typethesis
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1103-10332101.pdf
Size:
218.1 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format