Publication: 新式坐姿體前彎之效度研究分析
| dc.contributor.advisor | 趙叔蘋 | |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chao, Shu-Ping | |
| dc.creator | 劉志豪 | |
| dc.creator | Liou, Jhih-Hao | |
| dc.date | 2010 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-02-27T06:30:26Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-30T15:30:02Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-02-27T06:30:26Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017-02-27T06:30:26Z | |
| dc.description | 學位類別：碩士 | |
| dc.description | 校院名稱：國立台灣體育大學 | |
| dc.description | 系所名稱：運動健康科學系碩士班 | |
| dc.description | 學號：19706003 | |
| dc.description | 畢業學年度：98年 | |
| dc.description | 論文頁數：53頁 | |
| dc.description.abstract | 目的：現今體適能檢測採用坐姿體前彎作為柔軟度適能評估，下背肌群和腿後肌群為主要測量對象，因不同姿勢設定和器材使用，發展出多種坐姿體前彎評估方式，但下背柔軟度卻因為動作施行過程中的牽制關係，無法準確測量，故開發新式坐姿體前彎，以屈膝坐姿力求專一性準確測量下背柔軟度。方法：研究對象大學生108名，男性55名，平均年齡為20.27±1.62歲及女性53名，平均年齡為20.19±1.39歲，測量新式坐姿體前彎分數及使用MW test最大前彎測試測量下背柔軟度效度，測試前做一次MW test並在新式坐姿體前彎測量時也一併測量以比較下背柔軟度的效度，在統計分析的部分則是使用皮爾森相關以及95%的信賴區間了解新式坐姿體前彎檢測下背柔軟度的關連性，並使用線性迴歸去解釋下背柔軟度效度與新式坐姿體前彎成績之間關係，男女資料分開分析。結果：在皮爾森相關解釋下背柔軟度表現部分，男生部份，新式坐姿體前彎的下背柔軟度表現有高度相關 (r=0.90)，線性迴歸之R2解釋力為43.4%，女生部份，新式坐姿體前彎的下背柔軟度表現同樣有高度相關 (r=0.91)，R2解釋力為46.1%。結論：使用新式坐姿體前彎檢測下背柔軟度在經過統計分析證實新式檢測下背柔軟度有相當高之效度，經本研究證實姿勢和器材之改善，以減少腿後肌群在施行動作時的限制，即可專一並準確的檢測下背柔軟度。 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Flexibility is evaluated by sit-and-reach test in health-related fitness. In the history of sit-and-reach tests, scholars have their reasons to use the equipments or set posture. The muscle and ligament are pinned down together due to it’s posture-setting nature diminished each part of body’s flexibility during sit-and-reach tests. We develop a new sit-and-reach aims to precisely evaluate low back flexibility. We recruited 108 university students to participate in this study, males 55, age 20.27±1.62; females 53, age 20.19±1.39. All subjects completed the new sit and reach test and The MacRae and Wright test. To find out the correlation between low back flexibility criterion measures and the new sit and reach test, and to know the explanation between low back flexibility criterion measures and the new sit and reach scores. The validity of low back flexibility in men and women were found very high (r=0.90;r=0.91), and the R-squared in men and women is 43.4% and 46.1%. The new sit and reach test are highly valid measures of low back flexibility in both men and women. After we modified the equipments and setting-posture, The new sit and reach test has higher ability to evaluate low back flexibility when compared with the other protocols. | |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 次 第壹章 緖論……………………………………………………………1 第一節 前言…………………………………………………………1 第二節 研究目的……………………………………………………4 第三節 名詞解釋……………………………………………………4 第四節 研究範圍與限制……………………………………………5 第五節 研究的重要性………………………………………………5 第貳章 文獻探討………………………………………………………6 第一節 柔軟度的評估………………………………………………6 第二節 各式坐姿體前彎的測量方法………………………………12 第三節 坐姿體前彎相關研究結果…………………………………19 第四節 本章總結……………………………………………………23 第參章 研究方法與步驟………………………………………………24 第一節 研究對象……………………………………………………24 第二節 研究時間及地點……………………………………………24 第三節 研究工具……………………………………………………24 第四節 實驗測量項目及實施方法…………………………………26 第五節 實驗流程……………………………………………………30 第六節 資料收集與統計分析………………………………………30 第肆章 結果與討論……………………………………………………31 第一節 研究結果……………………………………………………31 第二節 討論…………………………………………………………35 引用文獻…………………………………………………………………39 中文部份………………………………………………………………39 英文部份………………………………………………………………40 附錄……………………………………………………………………44 | |
| dc.format.extent | 523725 bytes | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.ntus.edu.tw/handle/987654321/70981 | |
| dc.language | zh-TW | |
| dc.publisher | 運動健康科學系碩士班 | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | 中文部份 行政院體育委員會（1998）。國民體能檢測實務手冊。行政院體育委員會。 教育部（2006）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要修訂健康與體育學習領域。臺北市：教育部。 教育部（2006）。教育部94學年度臺閩地區中小學學生體適能檢測評估報告。臺北市：教育部。 方進隆（2005）。體適能推展與全人健康理念。國民體育季刊，34卷3期，78-83頁。 王慧如、吳鴻文、李明榮、林晉利、林晉榮、張文正、張怡雯、許弘昌、趙叔蘋、劉淑燕、蘇芳慶 （2004）。運動、休閒、健康科學–導論。臺中：鞋技中心，130-131。 田麥久（1996）。論運動訓練計劃。中國、北京：中國文化大學出版社。50-51。 林貴福、盧淑雲（2008）。運動保健與體適能。台北：冠學文化出版。 卓俊辰（1988）。柔軟度-體適能的重要因素之一。中華體育,６。96-102。 卓俊辰（2001）。大學生的健康體適能。台北：華泰文化事業。 張至滿（1991）。體育測量與評價。台北市：水牛出版社。104-107。 彭鈺人（1993）。體育測驗與測量。台北市：師大書苑。182-197。 黎俊彥、黃啟煌（1996）。延遲性肌肉痠痛的療法。中華體育，10（3），106-112。 董貞吟、黃乾全、丁如真、張家儒、陳品儒（2002）。護理人員對預防下背痛健康信念之探討-焦點團體法之應用。醫護科技學刊，4 卷3 期，224-238 頁。 謝燕群（1992）。柔韌素質與指塉紋數關係探討。成都體育學院學報，2（18），47－51。 英文部份 Battie’e, M. C., Bigos, S. J., Fisher, L. D., Spengler, D. M.,Hansson, T. H., Nachemson, A. L. ,& Wortley, M. D. (1990).The role of spinal flexibility in back pain complaints within industry. Spine,15(8), 768-773. Cailliet, R. (1988). Low back pain syndrome, 4th ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company. Cooper Institute for Aerobics Research. (1993).The Prudential FITNESSGRAM Test Administration Manual. Dallas, TX:Author. Da Silva, R.A., Larivière, C., Arsenault, A.B., Nadeau, S. & Plamondon, A. (2009). Pelvic stabilization and semisitting position increase the specificity of back exercises. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,41(2), 435-443. Grenier, S.G., Russell, C., & McGill, S.M. (2003). Relationships between lumbar flexibility, sit and reach test, and a previous history of low back discomfort in Industrial Workers. Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology, 28(2), 165-177. Hartman, J.G., & Looney, M. (2003) Norm-referenced and criterion referenced reliability and validity of the back-saver sit and reach. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science 7, 71-87. Hoeger, W.W., Hopkins, D.R., Button, S., & Palmer, T.A. (1990). Comparing the sit and reach with the modified sit and reach in measuring flexibility in adolescents.Pediatric exercise science Champaign, 2(2), 156-162. Hui, S.C., & Yuen, P.Y., Morrow, J.R., & Jackson, A.W. (1999). Comparison of the Criterion-Related validity of sit and reach test with and without limb length adjustment in asian adults. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70(4), 401-406. Hui, S.C., & Yuen, P.Y. (2000). Validity of the modified back-saver sit and reach test: a comparison with other protocols. Medicine & science in sports & Exercise, 32(9), 1655-1659. Jackson , A.W.,& Baker , A.A. (1986). The relationship of the sit and reach test to criterion measures of hamstring and back flexibility in young females .Research Quarterly For Exercise and Sport, 57(3),183-186. Jackson, A., & Langford, N.J. (1989). The criterion-related validity of the sit and reach test: Replication and Extension of Previous Findings. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60(4), 384-387. Jackson, A. W., Morrow, J. R., Bill, P. A., Kohl, H. W., Gordon, N. F.,& Blair, S. N. (1998).Relation of sit-up and Sit-and-reach tests to low back pain in adults. The Journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy, 27(1), 22-26. Johns, R. J., & Wright, V. (1962). Relative importance of various tissues in joint stiffness. Journal of Applied Physiology, 17(5), 824-828. Kubo, K., Kanehisa, H., & Kawakami,Y. (2000). Elasticity of tendon structures of the lower limbs in sprinters. Acta Physiology Scandnavica, 168, 327-35. López-Miñarro, P. A. (2010). Hamstring muscle extensibility influences the criterion-related validity of sit-and-reach and toe-touch tests. J Strength Cond Res, 24(4), 1013-8. MaeRae, I. F., & Wright, V. (1969). Measurement of back movement. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 28, 584-589. Minkler, S., & Patterson, P. (1994). The validity of the modified sit and reach test in college age students. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65(2), 189-192. Norkin, C. C., & White, D. J. (1995). Measurement of Joint Motion: A Guide to Goniometry. F.A. Davis company, Philadelphia, 2nd ed. Patterson, P., Wiksten, D.L., Ray, L., Flanders, C., & Sanphy, D. (1996). The validity and reliability of the back saver sit and reach test in middle school girls and boys. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67(4), 448-451. Wells, K.F. & Dillon, E.K. (1952). The sit and reach. A test of back and leg flexibility. Research Quarterly, 23, 115-118. | |
| dc.subject | 柔軟度;體適能;坐姿體前彎 | |
| dc.subject | flexibility;fitness;sit-and-reach | |
| dc.title | 新式坐姿體前彎之效度研究分析 | |
| dc.title | RESEARCH FOR THE VALIDITY OF THE NEW SIT AND REACH TEST | |
| dc.type | thesis | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1