Publication:
國中體育教師課程價值取向之個案研究

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisor陳春蓮
dc.contributor.advisorChen, Chun-Lian
dc.creator吳欣怡
dc.creatorWu, Xin-Yi
dc.date2010
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-27T06:46:53Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-30T15:30:12Z
dc.date.available2017-02-27T06:46:53Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-27T06:46:53Z
dc.description學位類別：碩士
dc.description校院名稱：國立台灣體育大學
dc.description系所名稱：體育研究所
dc.description學號：19301007
dc.description畢業學年度：98年
dc.description論文頁數：153頁
dc.description.abstract　　本研究旨在瞭解國中體育教師之課程價值取向情形，以及價值取向內涵之六個層面。研究對象以95學年度台中縣立宜心(化名)中學之兩位體育教師為主，運用質性研究之觀察法、半結構式訪談以及文件分析等多元方式，蒐集一學期之相關研究資料，輔以Q分類技術研究教師的體育課程價值取向。 　　研究結果發現：一、個案兩位體育教師所持之課程價值取向不同，A老師依序為學科精熟取向、自我實現取向、社會責任取向、學習歷程取向及生態整合取向；B老師則為生態整合取向、學科精熟取向、自我實現取向、社會責任取向及學習歷程取向。二、個案體育教師課程價值取向所涵蓋之六個層面亦不相同。
dc.description.abstract　　The purpose of this study was to investigate the value orientation of physical education curriculum from two Taichung junior high school teachers in 2006. The reaearcher attended the case teachers’ PE classes for one semester, collecting data through participant observation, interviews, artifact collection, and class journal keeping. For the advance of the credibility for crossing-checking of the case tecachers’ curriculum orientation. 　　The results of this study were listed as the following:1. The rank order of the case teachers’ value orientation of one PE curriculum was DM, SA, SR, LP and EI; another wsa EI, DM, SA,SR and LP. 2. The case teachers’ curriculum value orientation included six dimensions were different.
dc.description.tableofcontents目　次 第一章　緒論 　第一節　研究動機……………………………………………………1 　第二節　研究目的……………………………………………………3 　第三節　研究問題……………………………………………………4 　第四節　名詞界定……………………………………………………4 　第五節　研究範圍……………………………………………………5 第二章　文獻探討 　第一節　課程價值取向內涵…………………………………………7 　第二節　體育課程價值取向理論的內涵……………………………25 　第三節　體育課程價值取向相關之實徵研究………………………44 第三章　研究方法與設計 　第一節　研究架構……………………………………………………65 　第二節　研究參與者…………………………………………………66 　第三節　研究方法……………………………………………………68 　第四節　研究工具……………………………………………………69 　第五節　研究流程……………………………………………………72 　第六節　資料的描述、整理與分析與詮釋…………………………78 第四章　結果與討論 　第一節　研個案教師體育課程價值取向分析………………………84 　第二節　教師體育教學及課程價值取向內涵之分析………………89 第五章　結論與建議 　第一節　結論…………………………………………………………98 　第二節　建議…………………………………………………………100 參考文獻 　一、中文部份…………………………………………………………102 　二、英文部份…………………………………………………………104
dc.format.extent378395 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ntus.edu.tw/handle/987654321/71020
dc.languagezh-TW
dc.publisher體育研究所
dc.relation.isbasedon壹、中文部份 王秀梅（2002）。中華職前與實習體育教師課程價值取向比較之研究。國立臺灣師範大學體育學系在職進修碩士班碩士論文。 王春堎（1998）。彰化縣國小教師對體育課程價值取向暨課程決定之調查研究。國立體育學院體育研究所碩士論文。 王麗珊（2005）。初授身心動作教育課程教師之體育課程價值取向研究。國立臺東大學體育學系碩士班碩士論文。 吳芝儀、李奉儒譯（1999）。M. Q. Patton著。質的評鑑與研究。臺北市：桂冠。 周宏室、潘義祥（2002）。運動教育學。臺北市：師大書苑。 林秀琴(2007)。臺北市國小教師體育課程價值取向暨課程決定之研究。國立臺北教育大學體育學系碩士班碩士論文。 林建谷（2004）。一位國小教師體育課程價值取向之研究。臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士班碩士論文。 林建谷（2004a）。體育課程價值取向對國小體育教學的啟示。國教輔導，43（3），7-22。 林建谷、王老師(2004b)。一位國小教師體育課程價值取向之研究。論文發表於國立臺中師範學院體育學系主辦之九十三年體育課程改革與教學創新」學術研討會，臺中市。 林偉倫（2008）。離島高中學生體育課程價值取向研究。國立臺灣師範大學體育學系碩士班碩士論文。 李建輝（2006）。國小教師體育課程價值取向暨課程決定之個案研究。國立臺東大學體育教學碩士班論文。 張君玫譯（1999）。N. K. Denzin著。解釋性互動論。臺北市：弘智。 張春秀（1998）。載於許義雄等箸。體育課程理論（1-19）。運動教育與人文關懷（下）--課程與教學篇。臺北市：師大書苑。 張春秀（2000）。體育教師課程價值取向對學生學習思考與學習態度之影響。國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所博士論文，未出版，臺北市。 陳伯璋（1987）。潛在課程研究。臺北市：五南。 黃光雄、蔡清田（1999）。課程設計--理論與實際。臺北市：五南。 黃政傑（1998）。質化研究的原理與方法。載於黃政傑（主編），質的教育研究：方法與實例（1-44）。臺北市：漢文。 黃政傑（2002）。課程設計。臺北市：東華。 葉憲清（1998）。體育教材教法。臺北縣：正中。 謝應裕（2002）。臺北市國中教師對體育課程價值取向之調查研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。 藍金香（1997）。臺北國小教師對體育課程價值取向之調查研究。國立體育學院體育研究所碩士班論文，未出版，桃園縣。 貳、英文部份 Banville, D., Desrosiers, P., & Genet-Volet, Y.（2002）. Comparison of value orient-ations of Quebec and American teachers: A cultural difference? Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 469-482. Behets, D.（2001）. Value orientation of physical education preservice and inservice teacher. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 20, 144-154. Chen, A., & Ennis, C. D.（1996）. Teaching value-laden curriculua in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 15, 338-354. Chen, A., Liu, Z., & Ennis, C. D.（1997）. Universality and uniqueness of teacher educational value orientations: A cross-cultural comparison between USA and China Journal of Research and Development in Education, 30, 135-143. Cothran, D. J.（1996）. Students’ and teachers’ values in physical education. （PQDD Document Reproduction Service No. AAT 3092656） Cothran, D. J., & Ennis, C. D.（1998）. Curricula of mutual worth: Comparisons of students’ and teachers’ curricular goals. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 17, 307-326. Doll, R. C.（1996）. Curriculum improvement: Decision making and process （9th ed）.Needham Heights, Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon. Eisner, E. W. & Vallance, E.（1974）. Five conceptions of curriculum: Their roots and implications for curriculum planning. In E. W. Eisner, E. W. & Vallance, E. Conflicting conceptions of curriculum, 1-18. Berkeley, California: McCutchan. Ennis, C. D.（1992）. Curriculum theory as practiced: Case studies of operationalized value orientations. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 11,358-375. Ennis, C. D.（1994）. Urban secondary teachers’ value rientations: Social goals for teaching. Teaching & Teacher Education, 10, 109-120. Ennis, C. D.（1996）. A model describing the influence of values and context on student learning. In S. J. Silverman & C. D. Ennis （Eds.）, Student learning in physical education: Applying research to enhance instruction（pp. 127-148）.Cham-paign, ill.: Human Kinetics. Ennis, C. D., & Chen, A.（1993）. Domain specifications and content representative-ness of the revised value orientations inventory. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 64, 436-446. Ennis, C. D., & Chen, A.（1995）. Teachers’ value orientations in urban and rural school settings. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 66, 41-50. Ennis, C. D., & Hooper, L. M.（1988）. Development of an instrument for assessing educational value orientations. Curriculum Studies, 20, 277-280. Ennis, C. D., & Zhu, W.（1991）. Value orientations: A description of teachers’ goals for student learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62, 33-40. Ennis, C. D., & Chen, A., & Ross, J.（1992a）. Educational value orientations as a theoretical framework for experienced urban teachers’ curricular decision making. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 25, 156-164. Ennis, C. D., & Cothran, D. J., & Loftus, S. J.（1997）. The influence of teachers educational beliefs on their knowledge organization. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 30, 73-86. Ennis, C. D., & Mueller, L. K., & Hooper, L. M.（1990）. The influence of teacher value orientations on curriculum planning within the parameters of a theoretical framework. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sports,61,360-368. Ennis, C. D., & Ross, J., & Chen A.（1992b）. The role value orientations in curricular decision making: A rationale for teachers’ goals and expectations. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63, 38-47. Huang, C. C.（1999）. Differences in perceptions of teachers’and students’ values of physical education programs in private universities in Taipei City, Taiwan.（PQDD Document Reproduction Service No. AAT 9946899） Jewett, A. E., & Bain, L. L.（1985）. The curriculum process in physical education. Dubuque, Iowa: WCB Brown & Benchmark. Jewett, A. E., & Bain, L. L.（1995）. The curriculum process in physical education. Madison, WI: C. Brown and Benchmark. Jewett, A. E., & Bain, L. L., & Ennis, C. D.（1995）. The curriculum process in physical education （2nd ed.）. Dubuque, Iowa: WCB Brown & Benchmark. Jewett, A. E., & Ennis, C. D.（1990）. Ecological integration as a value orientation for curricular decision making. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 5（2）, 120-131. Klein, F. M.（1999）. Alternative curriculum conceptions and design. In A. C. Ornstein & L. S. Behar-Horenstein （Eds.）, Contemporary issues in curriculum （pp.30-35）. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Laricchiuta, N.（1998）. A description of four high school physical education teahers from the perspective of disciplinary mastery and ecological integration value orientations. （PQDD Document Reproduction Service No. AAT MQ50535） Liu, H. Y.（2001）. A descriptive study of value orientations of physical education in Taiwan, R.O.C. （PQDD Document Reproduction Service No. AAT 3014787） Marsh, C. J., & Willis, G.（2003）. Curriculum: Alternative approaches, ongoing issues （3rd ed.）. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill/Prentice-Hall. Martin, V. P.（1993）. Educational value orientations and physical education goals. （PQDD Document Reproduction Service No. ATT 9235448） McNeil, J. D.（1996）. Curriculum: A comprehensive introduction. New York: Harper-Collins College Press. Ornstein, A. C.（1982）. Curriculum contrasts: A historical overview, Phi Delta Kappan, 63（6）, 404-408. Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P.（1998）. Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues （3rd ed.）. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Rokeach, M.（1973）. The natural of human values. New York: Free Press. Schubert, W. H.（1986）. Curriculum: Perspective, paradigm, and possibility. New York: Macmillan. Solmon, M. A., & Ashy, M. H.（1995）. Value orientations of preservice teachers. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 66, 219-230. Spencer, H.（1979）. Five basic orientations to the curriculum. In E. W. Eisner（Ed.）, The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs （pp. 50-73）. New York: Macmillan. Wentzel, K. R.（1991）. Social competence at school: Relation between social responsibility and academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 61, 1-24. Wiles, J., & Bondi, J.（1998）. Curriculum development: A guide to practice（5th ed.）. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
dc.subject國中教師;體育課程;體育課程價值取向
dc.subjectJunior High School Teachers;Curriculum of Physical Education;The value orientation of physical education curriculum
dc.title國中體育教師課程價值取向之個案研究
dc.titleJUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS’ VALUE ORIENTATION OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION CURRICULUM – A CASE STUDY
dc.typethesis
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01.pdf
Size:
369.53 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

學位論文(103學年度之前)