Publication:

2009年全國運動會與2010年亞洲運動會女子自由式角力得分內容之探討

本研究之目的針對2009年全國運動會女子自由式角力第一量級至第四量級前三名選手比賽得分內容與時間分析研究，並以2010年亞運會女子自由式角力第一量級至第四量級前三名選手做比較。目的在於，比較兩層級之女子角力選手有效攻擊得分之差異。方法：以錄影帶紀錄兩組比賽內容，以系統觀察法將資料編碼進行統計分析以描述性統計進行各項得分結果之分析及獨立樣本t檢定進行兩組同量級選手得分內容之差異。結果：一、在得分次數比較，兩組的得分次數相同，獲得一分次數為最多，其次為獲得二分，兩組獲得五分則皆未得分比賽即結束；在攻擊秒數比較，兩組選手皆於比賽開始後三分鐘之內（第二回合完）即提前結束該場比賽。二、以不同組別之各量級選手進行有效攻擊次數與秒數比較，在有效攻擊次數方面，全運選手組第一量級、第三量級之獲得一分次數(M=6.38±3.89，M=4.52±2.57)顯著高於亞運選手組(M=3.68±1.88，M=3.06±1.57)t=-2.81,p<.05，t=-1.95,p<.05；全運選手組第一量級之獲得二分次數(M=3.94±2.3)顯著高於亞運選手組(M=2.2±1.03)t=-2.24, p<.05。在秒數方面，全運選手組第三量級之獲得三分秒數(M=21.33±24.22)顯著高於亞運選手組(M=164.5±48.79) t=5.89,p<.05。結論：我國選手整體有效攻擊得分內容（有效攻擊次數比例、比賽時間回合）與國外優秀選手表現相同。選手的表現會因為對手的程度不同其作戰策略也有所調整。在得分表現上優秀選手面對實力相當之對手時並未因對方實力相當而選擇保守攻擊，反而於比賽進行中更加積極進攻並勇於嘗試攻擊難度較高之技術動作進而獲得優勝。

The purpose of this study were to analyze the scoring content and time point of female wrestling game in first four weight classes and top three athletes in 2009 National Sport Games(NSG), and compared with the same classes athletes in 2010 Asian Game(AG). To compared differences of effective attack score in these two levels. The method is using video tape to record both competitions. Systematic observation method use to encode the data for statistical analysis. Descriptive Statistics for analysis all result of score. Independent t-test was compared to examine the difference on score between two competitions. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to process all the data. Post hoc test using LSD to compare the significant. Results: There were no significant difference between two groups. First point was the most frequency scoring categories then two points, and no one get five points. Average attack time was under three minutes after the competition began, and most of the competition was finish before times out. Second, compared the results of effective attack score and time of same classes between two groups, the times of first point was significant between first and third levels, the two points also significant at first class, moreover, the seconds of three points was significant at third class. Third, combined two groups data of same classes, there was different between one point and three points on effective attack time, also different between one point, two points, three points, and fall times on effective attack times. Conclusion：There were no significant different between two group’s techniques and effective attack score. The outstanding competitor, they will try to active, but not conservative attack, from the competition began to the end, they always keep to active attack and careful defend.