Publication: 籃球選手目標取向,教練領導行為與運動動機之相關研究
| dc.contributor.advisor | 杜登明 | |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Do, Deng-Ming | |
| dc.creator | 何全進 | |
| dc.creator | Ho, Chyuan-chin | |
| dc.date | 2001 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-02-22T14:39:42Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-30T15:18:41Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-02-22T14:39:42Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017-02-22T14:39:42Z | |
| dc.description | 學位類別：碩士 | |
| dc.description | 校院名稱：國立臺灣體育學院 | |
| dc.description | 系所名稱：體育研究所 | |
| dc.description | 畢業學年度：89年 | |
| dc.description | 論文頁數：92頁 | |
| dc.description.abstract | 中文摘要 本研究的目的在探討三級學校男子籃球選手目標取向、教練領導行為與運動動機之差異，以及各變項間之相關與預測。以國內三級學校男子籃球選手（國中108名、高中106名、大學122名共計336名）為研究對象，施以「運動目標取向量表」、「運動領導量表」、「運動動機量表」等量表。並將測量結果以相依樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析與事後比較、皮爾森積差相關、多元逐步回歸分析進行統計處理。 所得結果如下：（一）全體選手的「工作取向」顯著高於「自我取向」；國中選手的「工作取向」顯著高於高中與大學選手；高中選手的「自我取向」顯著高於大學選手。（二）全體選手「喜愛的」與「知覺的」教練領導行為有顯著差異;國中選手喜愛的「訓練與指導 」顯著高於大學選手；國中選手喜愛的「民主的行為」、「社會支持的行為」顯著高於高中與大學選手；國中、高中選手知覺的「訓練與指導」的顯著高於大學選手；國中選手知覺的「民主的行為」、「社會支持的行為」顯著高於高中與大學選手；高中選手知覺的「專制的行為」顯著高於大學選手。（三）高中選手「外在動機」顯著高於大學選手。（四）全體選手之「工作取向」、「自我取向」與「內在動機」、「外在動機」皆呈顯著正相關；全體選手之「工作取向」與「無動機」呈顯著負相關，「自我取向」與「無動機」呈顯著正相關；全體選手之「工作取向」和「自我取向」能有效預測「內在動機」和「外在動機」，而「工作取向」對「內在動機」有較高的預測力，「自我取向」對「外在動機」有較高的預測力。（五）除了選手所喜愛的「專制的行為」與「內在動機」無顯著相關外，其餘選手所喜愛的領導行為皆與「內在動機」、「外在動機」呈顯著正相關；所有選手喜愛的「專制的行為」與「無動機」呈顯著負相關；全體選手喜愛的「社會支持的行為」、「訓練與指導」能有效預測「內在動機」，而「社會支持的行為」有較高的預測力；選手喜愛的「獎賞（回饋）的行為」、「專制的行為」、「社會支持的行為」能有效預測「外在動機」，而「獎賞（回饋）的行為」、「專制的行為」有較高的預測力；選手喜愛的「專制的行為」能有效預測「無動機」。（六）除了選手喜愛的「專制的行為」與「工作取向」呈顯著負相關外，其餘選手喜愛的教練領導行為皆與「工作取向」、「自我取向」呈顯著正相關；全體選手喜愛的「社會支持的行為」能有效預測「工作取向」；選手喜愛的「專制的行為」和「獎賞（回饋）的行為」能有效預測「自我取向」，而「專制的行為」有較高的預測力。 | |
| dc.description.abstract | ABSTRACT The purposes of this study ware to examine the differences among Goal Orientation, Coach Leadership Behaviors and Sport Motivation among basketball players; furthermore, to predict the relationships among these variables. A total of 336 male basketball players (108 junior high school students, 106 senior high school students and 122 university students) ware selected as participants. All participants were asked to complete the Sport Goal Orientations Questionnaire, Leadership Scale for Sports, and Sport Motivation Questionnaire. The collection data were analyzed in terms of the paired samples t-test, one-way ANOVA, the Pearson’s correlation and multiple stepwise regression analysis. The results of this study indicated that: (1) All participants’ task orientation ware higher than ego orientation; junior high school players’task orientation ware higher than senior high school players and university players; senior high school players’ ego orientation ware higher than university players’. (2) A significant differences ware found in preferred and perceived coach leadership behaviors for all participants; junior high school players prefer their coaches to have training and instruction more than university players; junior high school players prefer their coaches to have democratic behavior and social support more than senior high school and university players; junior and senior high school players perceive their coaches to have training and instruction more than university players; junior high school players perceive their coaches to have democratic behavior and social support more than senior high school and university players; senior high school players perceive their coaches to have autocratic behavior more than university players. (3) Senior high school players had higher extrinsic motivation than university players. (4) All players’ task orientation and ego orientation ware positively related to intrinsic motivation and extrinsic motivation; all players’ task orientation ware negatively related to amotivation, while ego orientation ware positively related to amotivation; all players’ task orientation and ego orientation ware effective predictors of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, however task orientation was more predictive to intrinsic motivation and ego orientation was more predictive to extrinsic motivation. (5) All players’ preference coach leadership behaviors was positively related to intrinsic and extrinsic motivation except for players’ preferred autocratic behavior had no relation to intrinsic motivation; all players’ prefer autocratic behavior had negatively related amotivation; all players’ preferred social support and training and instruction ware two effective predictors of intrinsic motivation, and social support behaviors ware more efficient; all players’ preferred positive feedback, autocratic behavior, social support ware three effective predictors of extrinsic motivation, while positive feedback and autocratic behavior ware more efficient; all players’ preferred autocratic behavior was an effective predictor of amotivation. (6) All players’ preferred coach leadership behaviors ware positively related to task and ego orientation except for players’ prefer autocratic behavior ware no related to task orientation; all players’ preferred social support was an effective predictor of task orientation; all players’ preferred autocratic behavior and positive feedback ware two effective predictors of ego orientation, while autocratic behavior was more efficient. | |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 次 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究背景……………………………………………………………1 第二節 研究動機……………………………………………………………3 第三節 研究目的……………………………………………………………6 第四節 研究問題……………………………………………………………6 第五節 研究範圍與限制……………………………………………………7 第六節 名詞解釋……………………………………………………………7 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 目標取向理論………………………………………………………10 第二節 目標取向與運動動機之相關的文獻………………………………12 第三節 教練領導行為與運動動機之相關的文獻…………………………15 第四節 研究假設……………………………………………………………19 第三章 研究方法與步驟 第一節 研究架構……………………………………………………………21 第二節 研究工具……………………………………………………………22 第三節 研究對象……………………………………………………………24 第四節 施測程序……………………………………………………………26 第五節 施測時間與地點……………………………………………………26 第六節 資料分析……………………………………………………………26 第四章 結果與討論 第一節 結果…………………………………………………………………28 一、三級學校籃球選手目標取項之差異……………………………………30 二、三級學校籃球選手知覺與喜愛教練領導行為之差異…………………33 三、三級學校籃球選手運動動機之差異……………………………………42 四、三級學校籃球選手運動目標取向與運動動機間之相關與預測………44 五、三級學校籃球選手喜愛教練領導行為與運動動機之相關與預測……48 六、三級學校籃球選手喜愛教練領導行為與目標取向之相關與預測……52 第二節 討論…………………………………………………………………55 一、三級學校籃球選手目標取項之差異……………………………………55 二、三級學校籃球選手知覺與喜愛教練領導行為之差異…………………56 三、三級學校籃球選手運動動機之差異……………………………………59 四、三級學校籃球選手運動目標取向與運動動機間之相關與預測………60 五、三級學校籃球選手喜愛教練領導行為與運動動機之相關與預測……64 六、三級學校籃球選手喜愛教練領導行為與目標取向之相關與預測……66 第五章 結論與建議 第一節 結論…………………………………………………………………69 第二節 建議…………………………………………………………………73 | |
| dc.format.extent | 191864 bytes | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.ntus.edu.tw/handle/987654321/70582 | |
| dc.language | zh-TW | |
| dc.publisher | 體育研究所 | |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | 參考文獻 中文部分 李 迪（民49）。第三屆世界盃籃球賽名次如何產生的。籃球年刊，8-11。 李秀華（民85）。不同水準選手目標取向及內在動機之相關研究。國立體育學院論叢，7（1），45-53。 金明央（民88）。有無獎賞情況下運動樂趣及內在動機之比較研究。大專體育雙月刊，43，73-80。 邱宗志（民88）。男子籃球選手目標取向知覺動機氣候與運動動機之相關研究。未出版的國立體育學院教練研究所碩士論文，桃園。 吳國銑（民89）。我國大專運動教練領導行為比較研究。體育學報，28，59-68。 季力康、賴素玲、陳美燕（民84）。大專網球選手運目標取向與運動動機之相關研究。體育學報，20，1-12。 季力康（民82）。運動目標取向量表－信度與效度分析。國立體育學院論叢，4（1），179-185。 季力康（民83）。運動目標取向量表的建構效度-驗證性分析的應用。體育學報，20，299-310。 柯竺村（民83）。目標取向與外在獎賞對高工學生足球射十二碼球之內在動機之影響。國立體育學院論叢，6（2），215-233。 涂志賢（民89）。運動教練領導風格對選手成績表現與滿意度之影響。體育學報，28，45-58。 馬君萍（民88）。女子排球運動員知覺教練教練領導行為知覺運動動機氣候滿意度和內在動機之相關研究。未出版的國立體育學院教練研究所碩士論文，桃園。 黃金柱（民79）。國家級運動教練領導行為之調查研究。國立體育學院論叢，1（2），33-62。 許樹淵（民88）。如何提昇大專學生競技運動能力水準。大專體育雙月刊，43，7-11。 陳其昌（民86）。排球教練領導行為對運動動機氣候的影響。大專體育雙月刊，34，102-111。 陳美燕（民84）。運動動機量表之信度與效度分析。國立體育學院論叢，5（2），185-196。 莊豔惠（民86）。教練領導、團隊凝聚力對內在動機的影響。未出版的國立體育學院教練研究所碩士論文，桃園。 莊鵬輝（民84）。目標取向、外在報酬對國民小學學童踢毽子之內在動機的影響。體育學報，20，13-24。 張永賢（民85）。精熟取向籃球教學對不同成就目標取向國小學童運動表現與自我概念及內在動機之影響。未出版的國立體育學院碩士論文，桃園。 楊純碧（民87）。教練領導行為對團隊氣氛與教練選手關係滿意度之影響。未出版的國立體育學院碩士論文，桃園。 鄭志富、方明營（民83）。大專院校足球教練領導行為與運動員滿意度關係之研究。未出版的國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所碩士論文，臺北。 蔣憶德（民86）。女子籃球選手目標取向、知覺動機氣候、喜愛動機氣候及自覺能力與內在動機及滿足感之相關研究。未出版的國立體育學院教練研究所碩士論文，桃園。 盧俊宏（民87）。運動心理學。臺北市：師大書苑。 盧素娥（民84）。不同目標取向者的競賽成敗經驗在歸因因素、自覺能力及內在動機上的差異。國立體育學院論叢，5（1），63-82。 英文部分 Chelladurai, P. (1984). Discrepancy between preferences and preferred leadership behavior and satisfaction of athletes in varying sports. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6, 27-41. Chelladurai, P., & Saleh, S. D. (1980). Dimensions leader behavior in Sports: Developent of a leadership scale. Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 34-45. Connelly, T.A.(1997). The relationship of goal orientation and Motivation among woman golfers. Int ernational Inst for Sport & Human Performance (Microform Publications), University of Oregon, Eugene. Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 105-115. Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum. Deci. E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational process. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 39-80). New York: Academic Press. Deci. E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum. Deci. E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. Nebraska symposium on motivation, 38. 237-288. Duda, J. L., & Chi, L. (1989). The effect of task-and ego-involving conditions on perceived competence and causal attributions in basketball. Paper presented at the meeting of the association for the Advancement of Applied Sport Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle. Duda, J. L., & Chi, L., & Newton, M. (1990). Psychometric characteristics of the TEOSQ. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North American Society for the Psychology of Sport and Physical American Society for the Psychology of Sport and Physical Activity, University of Houston, TX. Duda, J. L., & White, S. A. (1992). Goal orientation and beliefs about the causes of sport success among elite skiers. The Sport Psychology, 6, 334-343. Dweck , C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048. Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328-346. Nicholls, J. G. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Nicholls, J. G. (1992). The general and the specific in the development and expression of achievement motivation. In G. C. Roberts(Ed.), Motivation in sport and exercise, ( pp.31-56). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Nicholls, J. G., & Duda, J. L. (1992). Dimension of achievement motivation in school work and sport. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 290-299. Robert, G. C., & Duda, J. (1984). Motivation in sport: The mediationg role of perceived ability. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6, 312-324. Ryan, E. D. (1977). Attribution, intrinsic motivation and athletics. In L. I. Gedvelas & M. E. Kneer (Eds.), Proceedings of the National Physical Education Association (pp.346-353). Chicago: Office of Publications Serves. Ryan, E. D. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Joural of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450-461. Smoll, F. L., & Smith, R. E. (1988). Reducing stress in youth sport: Theory and application. In F. L. Smoll, R. A. Magill, & M. J. Ash (Eds.), Children in sport (pp.229-249). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Stipek, D. J. (1993). Motivation to learn : from theory to practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Vallerand, R. J., & Reid, G. (1984). On the causal effects of perceived competence on intrinsic motivation: A test of cognitive evaluation theory. Joural of Sport Psychology, 6, 94-102. Vallerand, R. J., Gauvin. L. I., & Halliwell W. H. (1986). Negative effects of competitive on children’s intrinsic motivation. The Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 649-657. Walling, N. D., Duda, J. L., & Chi, L. (1993). The erceived motivational climate in sport questionnaire: Construct and predictive validity. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15, 172-183. Weinberg, R. S., & Jackson, A. (1979). Competition and extrinsic reward: Effection intrinsic motivation and attribution. Research Quarterly, 50(3), 494-502. Westre, K. R., & Weiss, M. R. (1991). The relationship between perceived coaching behaviors and group cohesion in high school football teams. The Sport Psychology, 5, 41-54. | |
| dc.subject | 運動動機;目標取向;教練領導行為;籃球選手 | |
| dc.subject | sport motivation;goal orientation;coach leadership behavior;basketball player | |
| dc.title | 籃球選手目標取向,教練領導行為與運動動機之相關研究 | |
| dc.title | The relationship of goal orientation, coach leadership behavior, and sport motivation among basketball players. | |
| dc.type | thesis | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1