本研究旨在於探討我國百岳登山者之間的內團體遊憩衝突為何，並進一步探討其支撐起這些衝突的價值觀為何。本研究採取了質性研究，以半結構訪談的方式蒐集資料，並以主軸式編碼與主題式分析來做為資料分析的工具。從對24位受訪者的訪談資料中可以看出，百岳登山者的內團體遊憩衝突實為不多，內團體遊憩衝突多發生在休息過夜的山屋中，並且「活動型態」、「資源特性」以及「生活型態容忍度」是造成這些遊憩衝突的主因。此外，本研究的另一個發現是在自己的隊伍中亦有可能產生遊憩衝突，多是因為技術程度的差異與生活型態容忍度所造成的遊憩衝突。架構起這些衝突的價值觀是平等與尊重。本研究結果可提供管理單位相關的規劃方向，如按照攻頂的時間來劃分床位。
This study aimed to explore recreation conflict among climbers who climb the top 100 peaks in Taiwan and further examining their values. This study employed semi-structure interviews to explore the in-group recreation conflict among the climbers. 13 climbers were purposively selected for the interviews. Open coding and thematic analysis were employed for the data analysis. This study found that most climbers felt the recreational conflict among them were not so evident. The results show that only limited number of in-group recreational conflicts exist among the climbers. The conflicts usually happened in the hut. Activity resources, resources attachment, and lifestyle tolerance were the three major reasons caused the in-group recreational conflicts. Furthermore, this study found that the in-group recreation conflict could happen within the climbers' own teams. This kind of conflict was often resulted from the different levels of climbing skills and life style tolerance. The values underpinned the conflicts were equity and respect. The findings of this study provide practical suggestions for the future policy planning.