Publication:
騎單車是為了休閒還是實用：單車休閒與單車通勤的關係

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisor陳定雄
dc.contributor.advisorChen, Ding-Xiong
dc.creator張世昌
dc.creatorZhang, Shih-chang
dc.date2007
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-22T15:42:47Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-30T15:23:32Z
dc.date.available2017-02-22T15:42:47Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-22T15:42:47Z
dc.description學位類別：碩士
dc.description校院名稱：國立台灣體育學院
dc.description系所名稱：休閒運動管理研究所
dc.description學號：19402008
dc.description畢業學年度：95年
dc.description論文頁數：120頁
dc.description.abstract　　In some places, bicycles are considered as one of the transport tools, and riding there is for function, while in some other places, bicycles are taken as physical activity, and thus riding there is for leisure. Riding for leisure or for function? 450 recreational cyclists from bicycle clubs and bicycles activities were sampled using convenience sampling, and there were 392 valid questionnaires or 89.2% of the sample. A self-developed questionnaire was administered to the respondents. This research firstly dealt with the relationship between recreational bicycling and bicycle commuting, second, the motivations and constraints of bicycle commuting were investigated, and finally, bicycle commuting policy was proposed. After the descriptive statistics analysis and Chi-square test, I concluded that there were strong connections between recreational bicycling and bicycle commuting, 38.5% of recreational cyclists also choose bicycle commuting. The motivations for bicycle commuting were enjoying riding bicycle, improving fitness, saving fuel, being environmentally-friendly, controlling weight, and commuting distance was short. The constraints to bicycle commuting were climate, lack of bikeways, bicycle theft, poor air quality, bad pavement, and safety. It is possible to encourage more cyclists to commute with bicycles by cycling awareness programs and better bicycling policies. The Taiwanese government should utilize the advantages of bicycle commuting, and promote cycling in Taiwan, not just for recreational purposes, but also for bicycle commuting purposes.
dc.description.tableofcontentsChapter1 　INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………1 　　Background and Motivation………………………………………………1 　　Purposes of the Study……………………………………………………3 　　Research Questions………………………………………………………4 　　Definition of Terms………………………………………………………4 　　Research Process…………………………………………………………5 Chapter2 　REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE…………………………………………6 　　The Importance and Benefits of Bicycling…………………………………6 　　Current Bicycling Conditions and the Motivation for Bicycle Commuting…29 　　Global Bicycling Conditions and Bikeway Systems………………………34 　　The Reasons That Taiwanese Do Not Cycle………………………………44 　　Bicycle Policy Development in Taiwan and Foreign Countries……………47 　　Research Hypotheses………………………………………………………51 Chapter3 　METHOD……………………………………………………………………52 　　Research Design……………………………………………………………52 　　Research Scope……………………………………………………………53 　　Sampling……………………………………………………………………54 　　Instrument…………………………………………………………………55 　　Questionnaires Implementation………………………………………………57 　　Data Analysis…………………………………………………………………57 Chapter4 　RESULTS……………………………………………………………………58 　　Descriptive Analysis…………………………………………………………58 　　Demographic Data Analysis…………………………………………………58 　　Bicycle Commuting Data Analysis……………………………………………66 　　Constraints to Bicycle Commuting Data Analysis………………………………69 　　Motivations for Bicycle Commuting Data Analysis……………………………74 　　Chi-Square Test and Analysis…………………………………………………80 Chapter5 　Discussion………………………………………………………………………96 　　Findings………………………………………………………………………96 　　Significance of the Study and Suggestions…………………………………98 　　Limitation and Directions for Future Research……………………………100 　　Conclusions………………………………………………………………101 REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………102 　　English References…………………………………………………………102 　　Chinese References…………………………………………………………110 Appendices………………………………………………………………………115 　A. BICYCLE COMMUTING QUESTIONNAIRE……………………………115 　B. CHINESE QUESTIONNAIRE……………………………………………118
dc.format.extent529699 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ntus.edu.tw/handle/987654321/70723
dc.languageen
dc.publisher休閒運動管理研究所
dc.relation.isbasedonEnglish References Allen, D. P., Rouphail, N., Hummer, J. E, & Milazzo II J. S. (1998). Operational analysis of uninterrupted bicycle facilities. Transportation Research Record, 1636, 29-36. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials [AASHTO]. (1991). Guide for the development of bicycle facilities. Washington, DC: Author. Aultman-Hall, L., & Hall F. L. (1998). Research design insights from a survey of urban bicycle commuters. Transportation Research Record, 1636, 21-28. Aultman-Hall, L., Hall, F. L., & Baetz, B. B. (1997). Analysis of bicycle commuter routes using geographic information systems: Implication for bicycle planning. Transportation Research Record, 1578, 102-110. Austroads. (1999). Guide to Traffic Engineering Practice: Part 14—Bicycles. Sydney: Austroads. Brandenburg, C., Matzarakis, A., & Arnberger, A. (2004). The effects of weather on frequencies of use by commuting and recreation bicyclists. Ber. Meteor. Inst. Univ. Freiburg, 12, 189-197. Bustos, T. (2006) Bicycle networks in Davis, California make active transportation possible. Active Living by Design. Chang, H. L. & Chang, H. W. (2005). Comparison between the differences of recreational cyclists in national scenic bikeway and local bike lane. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 6, 2178-2193. Chang, H. L., & Wu, S. C. (2005). Exploring the mode choice in daily travel behavior of the elderly in Taiwan. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 6, 1818-1832. Chang, H. W., & Chang, H. L. (2003). A strategic study of bicycle tourism in Taiwan. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 5, 1675-1685. Chertok, M., Voukelatos, A., Sheppeard, V., & Rissel, C. (2004). Comparison of air pollution exposure for five commuting modes in Sydney-car, train, bus, bicycle and walking. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 15(1), 63-67. City of Pittsburgh bicycle plan. (n.d.) Crawford, D. W., Jackson, E. L., & Godbey. G. C. (1991). A hierarchical model of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences, 13, 309-320. Crawford, F., Mutrie, N., & Hanlon, P. (2001). Employee attitude towards active commuting. International Journal of Health Promotion & Education. 39(1), 14-20. CROW. (1993). Quicker by bicycle: Policy manual for a bicycle-friendly infrastructure. In, Michels, T. (ed) (1993) Cycling in the city, pedaling in the polder: Recent developments in policy and research for bicycle facilities in the Netherlands, CROW, the Netherlands, 25-52. Demaio, P., & Gifford, J. (2004). Will smart bikes succeed as public transportation in the United States? Journal of Public Transportation, 7(2), 1-15. Dill, J., & Carr, T. (2003). Bicycle commuting and facilities in major U.S. Cities: If you build them, commuters will use them—another look. Compendium of Papers CD-ROM of the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC. Dool, D. V. D. (2003). Reinventing the bicycle wheel. Proceedings of AaeE Conference 29, 1-10. Dora, C. (1999). A different route to health: Implications of transport policies. British Medical Journal, 318, 1686-1689. Electronic reference formats recommended by the Central Weather Bureau (CWB). (2007). The Bicycle and its Basic Facilities. Retrieved May 2, 2007, from http:/www.cwb.gov.tw Electronic reference formats recommended by the Department of Health, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. Retrieved May 8, 2007, from http:/www.doh.gov.tw Electronic reference formats recommended by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O. C. (2005). Retrieved May 3, 2007, from http:/fies2.tpg.gov.tw/212.asp?year=94 Electronic reference formats recommended by the Directorate General of Highways, M.O.T.C. (2007). Retrieved June 21, from http://www.thb.gov.tw/hw/look2-2.html#a8 Electronic reference formats recommended by the European Cyclists’ Federation. (1991). The Bicycle and its Basic Facilities. Retrieved March 9, 2007, from http://www.ecf.com Electronic reference formats recommended by the MayoClinic.com (2006). Retrieved April 29, 2007, from http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/exercise/SM00109 Electronic reference formats recommended by the South China Insurance Co., LTD. (2007). Retrieved June 21, 2007, from http://www.south-china.com.tw/pro01-1.asp?sn3=119 Electronic reference formats recommended by the Wikipedia (2006). Retrieved November 8, 2006, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Forester, J. (2005). The place of bicycle transportation in modern industrialized societies. Preserving the American Dream Conference. Godefrooij, T. & Pettinga, A. D. (1993). Design and maintenance of bicycle facilities. In, Michels, T. (ed) (1993) Cycling in the city, pedaling in the polder: Recent developments in policy and research for bicycle facilities in the Netherlands, CROW, the Netherlands, 121-132. Guit, A. (1993). Facilities for bicycle parking. In, Michels, T. (ed) (1993) Cycling in the city, pedaling in the polder: Recent developments in policy and research for bicycle facilities in the Netherlands, CROW, the Netherlands, 177-194. Hamer, L. (1999). Making T.H.E. Links—Integrating sustainable Transport, Health and Environmental policies: A guide for local authorities and health authorities. London: Health Education Authority. Herman, M. (1993). Bicycle Blueprint: A plan to bring bicycling into the mainstream in New York City, Transportation Alternatives, New York. Hillman, M. (1990). The role of walking and cycling in transport policy. Discussion Paper 8, Transport studies Unit, Oxford University, Oxford. Hillman, M. (1997). Health promotion: The potential of non-motorized transport. In T. Fletcher & A. J. McMichael (Eds), Health at the crossroads: Transport policy and urban health. London: Wiley. Hmaidan, W. M. (n.d. ). National land transport strategy options for Lebanon—On the move without your car. Green Line Association. Hunter, W., Harkey, D., Stewart, & Birk, M. (2000). Portland’s blue bike lanes: Adapting a European treatment to a United States City. University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center. Kazimee, B. A. (n.d.). Sustainable urban design paradigm: twenty five simple things to do to make an urban neighborhood sustainable. School of Architecture and Construction Management Washington State University, USA. Killingsworth, R. E., & Lamming, J. (2001). Development and public health—Could our development patterns be affecting our personal health? Urban Land, 12-17. Krizek, K. J., Johnson, P. J., & Tilahun, N. (2004). Gender differences in bicycling behavior and facility preferences. Research on Women’s Issues in Transportation, 31-40. Krizek, K. J., & Roland, R. W. (n.d.). What is at the end of the road? Factors affecting discontinuities of on-street bicycle lanes in urban settings. Transportation Research, Part D. Ling, S., Kwang, J., & Tjhin, W. (2002) Environmental scan of facilities at UWA to encourage active commuting. University of Western Australia. Litman, T. (1999). Quantifying the benefits of non-motorized transport for Achieving TDM objectives. Victoria transport Policy Institute. Victoria, Canada. Liu, X., Wei, H., Guan, H., & Ma, J. (2003). Repositioning bicycling in transportation policies and strategies from the perspective of mode choice changes in large Chinese cities. Compendium of Papers CD-ROM of the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC. 12-16. Lohr, A. M. (1999). Consideration, Process, and Practice for Bicycle Planning. Master of Urban and Regional Planning. Major Paper Submitted to Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Lumsdon, L., & Mitchell, J. (1999). Walking, transport and health: do we have the right prescription? Health Promotion International. 14(3),271-280. Mason C. (2000). Healthy people, places and transport. Health Prom J Australia. 10(3), 190-196. Moritz, W. E. (1997). Survey of North American bicycle commuters design and aggregate results. Transportation Research Record, 1578, 91-101. Nankervis, M. (1999). The effect of weather and climate on bicycling commuting. Transportation Research Report, 33, 417-431. Oja, P., Vuori, I., & Paronen, O. (1998). Daily walking and cycling to work: their utility as health-enhancing physical activity. Patient Education and Counseling, 33, 87-94. Provisional North Nottinghamshire Local Transport Plan. (2000). Nottinghamshire County Council. Papon, F. (2001). Towards the end of the decline of walking and cycling in France? Institut National de Recherche sur les Transports et leur Securite. Porter, C., Suhrbier, J., & Schwartz, W. L. (1999). “Forecasting bicycle and pedestrian travel-state of the practice and research needs”. Transportation Research Record, 1674, 94-101. Potter, S., Enoch, M. (1997). Regulating transport’s environmental impacts in a deregulating world. Transport Research Part D. 2( 4), 271-282. Pucher, J. & Bhehler, R. (2005). Why Canadians cycle more than Americans: A comparative analysis of bicycling trends and policies. Transport Policy, 13, 265-279. Pucher, J., & Dijkstra, L. (2000). Making walking and cycling safer: Lessons from Europe. Transportation Quarterly, 54(3), 1-33. Pucher, J., Komanoff, C., & Schimek, P. (1999). Bicycling renaissance in north America? Recent trends and alternative policies to promote bicycling. Transportation Research, 33, 625-654. Pucher, J. & Renne, J. (2004). Socioeconomic characteristics of urban travelers: Evidence from the 2001 NHTS. Transportation Quarterly, 57(3), 49-78. Replogle, M. (1995). Integrating pedestrian and bicycle factors into regional transportation planning models: summary of the state-of-the art and suggested steps forward. Environmental Defense Fund 1875 Connecticut Ave. NW Washington, DC, 75-96. Rissel, C. (2003). Ride your bike: healthy policy for Australians. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 14(3), 151-153. Ritchie, B. W. (1998). Bicycle tourism in the south island of New Zealand: Planning and management issues. Tourism Management, 19(6), 567-582. Rivera, G. A. D. (2000). Bicycle plan for the city of Medellin. Conference Velomondial. Amsterdam, Holland, Europe. Rollman, S. (n.d.) City of cyclists. Planning in a Car Culture. Russell, R. V. (1982). Planning programs in recreation. U.S.A Missouri: Mosby. Sallis, J. F., Bauman, A., & Pratt, M. (1998). Environmental and Policy Interventions to Promote Physical Activity. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 15(4), 379-397. Tolley, R. (1990). The Greening of Urban Transport: Planning for Walking and Cycling in Western Ciies. Belhavern Press, London. Virginia Department of Transportation. (1994). A Virginia Guide for Bicycle Facility Planning. Richmond, VA: Author. Wadhwa, L. C. (1998). Cycling in a medium-sized Australian city. ITE Journal on the Web. August, 99-105. Waerden, P. V. D., Borgers, A., & Timmermans, H. (2003). Cyclists’ perception and evaluation of street characteristics. TRB 2004 Annual Meeting CD-ROM. Walsh, M. P. (1992). Transport and the environment: local, regional, and global challenges and opportunities. Invited paper presented at the XXIV FISITA Congress. June 7-11. London, England. Wang, D. J. (n.d.) 10 Air Pollution Control Strategies for Taipei City. Bureau of Environmental Protection, Taipei City Government, Taipei, Taiwan, 126-134. Chinese References Chang, C. X. (2004). The study on feasible bikeways in sustainable city. Unpublished master thesis, Tamkang University Architecture Graduate School Architecture Master Program, Taipei, Taiwan. 張忠興 (2004)。都市永續自行車道可行性探討—以台北市捷運芝山至北投站為例。淡江大學建築學系未出版碩士論文。 Chang, H. W. (2004). A study on development experience of recreational cycling. Journal of Urban Traffic Quarterly, 19(1), 1-10. 張馨文 (2004)。各國發展自行車遊憩經驗之研究。都市交通，19(1)，1-10。 Chang, K. H. (2004). A research on recreational cyclists: The case of national north coastline scenic Area. Unpublished master thesis. University of Chung Hua, Hsinchu, Taiwan. 張光華 (2004)。自行車遊客行為特性之研究-以北海岸風景區為例。中華大學建築與都市計畫學系未出版碩士論文，新竹市。 Chang, T. Z. (2000). The greening of transportation by the perspective of global bicycle transportation. Urban Transport of China, 3, 36-38. 張探昭 (2000)。從世界自行車交通的發展看綠色交通。城市交通，3，36-38. Chen, C. M. (1999). The individual choice model of mass transit system by bicycle users. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of National Cheng Kung, Tainan, Taiwan. 陳建銘 (1999)。腳踏車使用者轉乘捷運系統之個體選擇行為模式。國立成功大學土木工程學系未出版碩士論文，臺南市。 Cheng, Y. H. (2005). A study of bicycle activity on recreation specialization measurement index. Journal of Da-ming, 6, 145-160. 鄭育雄 (2005)。自行車活動遊憩專門化衡量模式之研究。大明學報，6，63-67。 Chinese Institute of Landscape Architect in Taiwan (2002). The bikeway system development and design in Taiwan. Sport Council of Executive Yuan, Taipei. 中華民國景觀學會 (2002)。自行車道設施設計準則彙編。行政院體育委員會。 Hou, L. S. (2005). The environmental behavior study of commuter bicycle: A case study of Hualien Girls Senior High School. Unpublished master thesis, University of Dong Hwa, Hualien, Taiwan. 侯良憲 (2005)。自行車通學之環境行為研究-以花蓮女中為例。國立東華大學環境政策研究所未出版碩士論文，花蓮縣。 Ho, Y. C. (2003). The anti-dumping regulation and practice of European Union: Case study of bicycle industry in Taiwan. The Law Monthly, 54(1), 47-66. 何曜琛 (2003)。歐盟反傾銷制度與實習—以臺灣自行車業為例。法令月刊，54(1), 47-66。 Hsieh, C. D. (2002). Bicycles in Taipei transport policy. HuaFan Academic Journal, 8, 198-211. 謝慶達 (2002)。臺北市運輸政策中的腳踏車定位。華梵學報，8，198-211。 Huang, S. C., Shiue, Y. P,. & Lin, Y. H. (1999). A study of recreational bikers preferences for the physical attributes for biking activities. Journal of Outdoor Recreation, 12(4), 43-60. 黃淑君、薛毓屏、林育慧 (1999)。遊憩單車使用者對單車活動的實質環境屬性偏好之研究。戶外遊憩研究，12(4), 43-60。 Jin, M. J. (1999). The strategy construction of bicycle industry in Taiwan. The Journal of Mechanical Industry, 73, 52-60. 金美敬 (1999)。臺灣自行車產業策略構面。機械產業速報，73，52-60。 Ku, P. W. (2006). Actualizing “bicycle island”: from “recreation” to “transportation”. National Sports Quarterly, 35(1), 83-87. 古博文 (2006)。邁向「自行車島」：從「遊憩型」到「運輸型」的自行車。國民體月季刊，35(1)，83-87。 Liao, J. D. (2000). The origin and evolvement process of bicycle. Bicycle Industry, 26, 47-54. 廖晉迪 (2000)。自行車起源與演進過程。自行車工業，26，47-54。 Liao, M. F. (2003). Research on recreational attraction, service quality, tourist satisfaction, and loyalty of the Tong-Fon bikeway green corridor. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Nan Hua, Chia-yi, Taiwan. 廖明豐 (2003)。東豐自行車綠廊之遊憩吸引力、服務品質與遊客滿意度及忠誠度之研究。南華大學旅遊事業管理學研究所未出版碩士論文。 Liao, S. L. (1998). The influence of being World Trade Organization member to bicycle industry in Taiwan. Taiwan Economic Research Monthly, 21(6). 43-48. 廖淑玲 (1998)。成為WTO會員國後對我國自行車業的影響。臺灣經濟研究月刊，21(6)，43-48。 Lo, T. M. & Lin, F. T. (2006). The research of leisure motivations of the participants in bicycle outdoor activity of Dong-Feng green corridor. The Chinese Taipei University Sports Federation Conference on Physical Education and Sports, 237-242. 駱東明、林房儹 (2006)。東豐綠廊自行車運動參與民眾之休閒利益初探。中華民國大專院校95學年度體育學術研討會專刊，237-242。 Ou, J. R. (1998). The future advancement of present bicycle industry in Taiwan. Metal Industries, 32(1), 61-62. 歐嘉瑞 (1998)。現階段我國自行車工業重點推動工作。金屬工業，32(1)，61-62。 Taipei City Government of Department of Transportation. (2004). Taipei city bicycle policy 132, Taipei City Government of Department of Transportation, Taipei. 臺北市政府交通局 (2004)。臺北市腳踏車政策132。臺北市政府交通局：臺北。 Tsao, S. M., & Lin, C. H. (2004). Bicycle parking demand at mass rapid transit station in Taipei. Journal of Urban Traffic Quarterly, 19(3), 16-31. 曹壽民、林俊宏 (2004)。臺北都會區捷運車站腳踏車停車需求之研究。都市交通，19(3)，16-31。 Wang, C. H. (2002). A study on the influence of the features of a bicycle’s frame form on the image perception. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan. 王宗興 (2002)。自行車車架造形特徵對意象認知影響之研究。國立成功大學工業設計研究所未出版碩士論文。 Wang, C. P. (2004). Recreational conflict between hikers and mountain bikers. Journal of Outdoor Recreation, 17(4), 71-91. 王正平 (2004)。登山健行遊客與登山自行車使用者遊憩衝突之研究。戶外遊憩研究，17(4)，71-91。 Wu, Y. S. (2004). The general situation of bicycle industry. Industry Research and Technique, 151, 119-130. 吳義勝 (2004)。自行車產業概況。產業調查與技術季刊，151，119-130。 Wu, L. S. & Zhang, L. Y. (2004). The space distribution, developing progress and internationalized development of bicycle industry in Taiwan: Case study of Merida and Giant. Quarterly Journal of Bank of Taiwan, 53(3), 134-172. 吳連賞、張翎茵(2004)。臺灣自行車工業的空間分布、發展歷程及立於國際之道—以美利達、巨大為例。臺灣銀行季刊，53(3)，137-172。 Xie, M. Y. (1999). The bicycle industry developmental trend from the perspective the Euro Bike. Bimonthly Bicycle Industry, 19, 56-66. 謝明穎(1999)。由歐洲展看自行車產業發展趨勢。自行車工業，19，56-66。 Yang, L. K. & Chang, M. H. (2005). Ideas and suggestions for bicycle parking at MRT stations. Rapid Transit Technology, 33, 139-150. 楊立國、張美華 (2005)。捷運車站腳踏車停車規劃的新思維。捷運技術，33，139-150。 Yen, J. J., Shuien, Y. G., Shiu, H. R., Chiao, Y. S., & Liauo, L. M. (2002). Study of recreational activities conflict between the participants of biking and rollerblading strollers in urban park. Journal of Outdoor Recreation, 15(1), 1-16. 顏家芝、薛雅菁、徐慧蓉、趙又萱、廖梨棉 (2002)。都會公園單車活動與直排輪活動╱散步者之遊憩衝突研究。戶外遊憩研究，15(1)，1-16。 Zheng, C. Y. (1997). Urge for a bikeway part 2: Strive for a bicycle right on the road. ProEco, 9, 57-59. 鄭朝陽 (1997)。爭取單車行路權。環耕，9，57-57。 Zhu, Z. X. (2001). The reflection of bicycle industry in Taiwan: Taiwan v.s. Mainland China. Bimonthly Bicycle Industry, 31, 28-33. 朱忠雄(2001)。臺灣自行車產業的省思—臺灣v.s.中國大陸。自行車工業，31，28-33。
dc.subjectbicycle commuting;bikeway;cyclist
dc.title騎單車是為了休閒還是實用：單車休閒與單車通勤的關係
dc.titleRIDING FOR LEISURE OR RIDING FOR FUNCTION: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RECREATIONAL BICYCLING AND BICYCLE COMMUTING
dc.typethesis
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
700005701.pdf
Size:
517.28 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

學位論文(103學年度之前)