Publication:
兒童動作評量測驗工具與第二版粗動作發展測驗之信度研究

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisor吳昇光
dc.contributor.advisorWu, Sheng-Guang
dc.creator許雅怡
dc.creatorShu, Ya-Yi
dc.date2005
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-22T14:47:41Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-30T15:19:28Z
dc.date.available2017-02-22T14:47:41Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-22T14:47:41Z
dc.description學位類別：碩士
dc.description校院名稱：國立臺灣體育學院
dc.description系所名稱：體育研究所
dc.description畢業學年度：93年
dc.description論文頁數：115頁
dc.description.abstract研究目的：本研究針對Movement Assessment Battery for Children test（Movement ABC test）及Test of Gross Motor Development-Second Edition（TGMD-2）兩工具進行信度之分析。方法：本研究對象為128名7-10歲之兒童，隨機分成A、B兩組，同時分開接受Movement ABC test及TGMD-2測驗，連續三次測驗間隔七天。所得資料第一、二次測驗間的資料分析為施測者內信度及兩工具相關聯性測驗，以ICC（2,1）及皮爾森積差相關進行統計分析；所得資料第二、三次測驗間的資料分析為施測者間信度測驗，以ICC（3,1）進行統計分析。結果：在使用Movement ABC test工具方面，物理治療師與體育教師在9-10歲年齡層具較高的一致性（ICCs=0.70），7-8歲兒童則為低評分者間信度（ICCs=0.22）。在評分者內信度方面，物理治療師在9-10歲年齡層具高度信度（ICCs=0.84），7-8歲年齡層具中度信度（ICCs=0.67）；體育教師在9-10歲年齡層具中度信度（ICCs=0.50），7-8歲年齡層具高度信度（ICCs=0.79）。在使用TGMD-2工具方面，物理治療師與體育教師具較高的一致性（ICCs=0.71），在評分者內信度方面，物理治療師與體育教師皆具中度信度（ICCs=0.67~0.71）。Movement ABC test及TGMD-2兩工具間之結果呈顯著負相關（P<0.01）。結論：整體而言，欲將Movement ABC test及TGMD-2兩工具使用於我國兒童動作能力之篩檢，在評分者方面的訓練首當重視，在常模方面仍需稍作調整或建立我國兒童的常模，如此測驗之結果才具正確的評量意義。
dc.description.abstractAbstract 　　Purpose：The purpose of this study was to examine the inter- and intra-rater reliability between a therapist and a physical education teacher scoring in the Movement Assessment Battery for Children test（Movement ABC test）and the Test of Gross Motor Development-Second Edition（TGMD-2）. Method：Participants were 128 children who were randomly divided into two groups, aged 7-10. Two evaluators（a therapist and physical education teacher）used the Movement ABC test and TGMD-2 individually. The intra-class correlation coefficients（ICCs） was used to determine the intra- and inter-rater reliability. The Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to determine the relationship between the Movement ABC test and the TGMD-2. Results：The inter-rater reliability was poor to moderate（ICCs=0.22~0.70）and the intra-rater reliability in scorers was moderate to good（ICCs=0.50~0.84） in the Movement ABC test. The inter-rater reliability（ICCs=0.71）and the intra-rater reliability（ICCs=0.67~0.71） were moderate in TGMD-2. Significant correlations（P<0.01）between Movement ABC and TGMD-2 tests were found. Conclusions：Proper braining of evaluation to use the Movement ABC test and TGMD-2 is very important so that the results of those tests may be adequate interpretation as children’s motor abilities. Reasonable consistency between therapists and physical education teachers in the use of the Movement ABC test and TGMD-2
dc.description.tableofcontents目　次 第一章　緒論 　第一節　研究背景……………………………………………………………………01 　第二節　研究目的……………………………………………………………………05 　第三節　研究問題……………………………………………………………………06 　第四節　研究假設……………………………………………………………………07 　第五節　研究限制與假定……………………………………………………………08 　第六節　名詞釋義……………………………………………………………………10 第二章　文獻探討 　第一節　兒童動作發展之特性………………………………………………………12 　第二節　測量工具的選擇……………………………………………………………16 　第三節　信度研究……………………………………………………………………19 第三章　研究方法與步驟 　第一節　研究架構……………………………………………………………………26 　第二節　研究參與者…………………………………………………………………27 　第三節　研究工具……………………………………………………………………28 　第四節　研究步驟……………………………………………………………………33 　第五節　資料分析……………………………………………………………………34 第四章　研究結果 　第一節　Movement-ABC test工具之信度分析 ……………………………………37 　第二節　TGMD-2工具之信度分析…………………………………………………59 　第三節　Movement ABC test及TGMD-2兩工具之相關性分析 ……………………72 第五章　討論 　第一節　Movement ABC test工具之評分者間信度與評分者內信度 ……………78 　第二節　TGMD-2之評分者間信度與評分者內信度………………………………83 　第三節　Movement ABC test與TGMD-2兩工具間的關聯性 ………………………85 第六章　結論與建議 　第一節　結論…………………………………………………………………………87 　第二節　建議…………………………………………………………………………88 參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………………90
dc.format.extent235114 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ntus.edu.tw/handle/987654321/70648
dc.languagezh-TW
dc.publisher體育研究所
dc.relation.isbasedon參考文獻 中文部分 王淑樺（2004）。學童參與桌球訓練前後動作能力之效益分析。國立臺灣體育學院碩士論文。 王鍾和（1997）。兒童發展。台北：大洋。 林冠宏（2002）。發展協調障礙之動作能力特性分析與分類。中國醫藥學院醫學研究所碩士論文。 吳昇光、蔡輔仁（2002）。我國發展協調障礙學童之體適能及動作能力研究。教育部委託研究計畫。 邱皓政（2002）。量化研究與統計分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析（二版）。台北：五南。 徐永玟（2002）。台南市發展性動作失調學齡前兒童之鑑定過程與感覺統合治療效果之研究。彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所博士論文。 徐台閣（1988）。信度的觀念與計算方法。中華體育，6（1），22-27。 陳明男（1990）。兒童發展。台北：國立編譯館。 陳福成（2004）。發展協調障礙兒童之團體動作訓練及縱向評估研究。中國醫藥大學醫學研究所碩士學位論文。 詹棟樑（1994）。兒童人類學－兒童發展。台北：國立編譯館。 歐德芳（1998）。兒童發展與輔導。台北：精銳。 蘇建文、林美珍、程小危、林惠雅、幸曼玲、陳李綢、吳敏而、柯華葳、陳淑美（1998）。發展心理學。台北：心理。 外文部分 Ayres, J. A. (1989). Sensory Integration and Praxis Test. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services. Aponte, R., French, R., & Sherrill, C. (1990). Motor development of Puerto Rican children : Cross-cultural perspectives. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 1200-1202. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.). Washington,DC: Author. Bruininks, R. H. (1978). Brininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency Examiners Manual. Circle Pines, MI: American Guidance Service. Bailey, D. B., & Wolery, M. (1989). Assessing Iinfants and Preschoolers with Handicaps. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Company. Bayley, N. (1993). Bayley Scales of Infant Development. New York: The psychological Corporation. Burton, A. W., & Miller, D. E. (1998). Movement Skill Assessment. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Cantell, M. H., Ahonen, T. P., & Smyth, M. M. (1994). Clumsiness in adolescence: Educational, motor, and social outcomes of motor delay detected at 5 years. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11(2), 115-129. Cooley, D., Oakman, R., McNaughton, L., & Ryskas, T. (1997). Fundamental movement patterns in Tasmanian primary school children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84(1), 307-316. Coster, W., Deeney, T., Haltiwanger, J., & Haley, S. (1998). School Function Assessment. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation. Chow, S. M. K., Henderson, S. E., & Barnett, A. L. (2001). The Movement Assessment Battery for Children: A comparison of 4-year-old to 6-year-old children from Hong Kong and the United States. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(1), 55-61. Evaggellnou, C., Tsigilis, N., & Papa, A. (2002). Construct validity of the Test of Gross Motor Development : A cross-validation approach. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19, 483-495. Fox, A. M., & Lent, B. (1996). Clumsy children: Primer on developmental coordination disorder. Canadian Family Physician, 42, 1965-1971. Gillberg, I. C., & Gillberg, C. (1989). Chidren with preschool minor neurodevelopmental disorders. IV: Behavior and school achievement at age 13. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 31, 3-13. Gallahue, D. L. (1996). Developmental Physical Education for Today's Children. Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark. Haywood, K. W. (1986). Life Span Motor Development. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Henderson, L., & Sugden, D. A. (1992). Movement Assessment Battery for Children. London: The Psychological Corporation. Henderson, S. E., & Henderson, L. (2002). Toward an understanding of development coordination disorder. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19, 12-31. Kubiszyn, T., & Borich, G. (1987). Educational Testing and Measurement : Classroom Application and Practice (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman. Kadesjo, M. D., & Gillberg, M. D. (1999). Developmental coordination disorder in Swedish 7-year-old children.Psychiatry, 38(7), 820-828. Lyman, H. B. (1971). Test Scores and What They Mean (2nd ed.). Englewood cliffs, NJ: Orentice-Hall. Leemrijse, C., Meijer, O. G., Vermeer, A., Lambregts, B., & Ader, H. J. (1999). Detecting individual change in children with mild to moderate motor impairment : The standard error of measurement of the Movement ABC. Clinical Rehabilitation, 13, 420-429. Maeland, A. F. (1992). Identification of children with motor coordination priblems. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 9, 330-342. Missiuna, C., & Pollock, N. (1995). Beyond the norms : Need for multiple sources of data in the assessment of children. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 15(4), 57-71. Miyahara, M., Tsujii, M., Hanai, T., Jongmans, M., Barnett, A., Henderson, S. E., Hori, M., Nakanishi, K., & Kageyama, H. (1998). The movement assessment battery for children: A preliminary investigation of its usefulness in Japan. Human Movement Science, 17, 679-697. Miyahara, M., & Register, C. (2000). Perception of three terms to describe physical awkwardness in children. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 21, 367-376. Ottenbacher, K. J., & Tomchek, S. D. (1993). Reliability analysis in therapeutic research : Practice and procedures. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 10-16. Ottenbacher, K. J. (1995). An examination of reliability in developmental research. Journal of Developmenal and Behavioral Pediatrics, 16, 177-182. Portney, G. L., & Watkins, M. P. (2000). Foundations of Clinical Research : Applications to Practice (2 ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Payne, V. G., & Isascs, L. D. (2002). Human Motor Development : A Lifespan Approach (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill. Riggen, K. J., Ulrich, D. A., & Ozmun, J. C. (1990). Reliability and concurrent validity of the test of motor impairment- Henderson revision. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 7, 249-258. Seefeldt, V. (1989). This is motor development. Motor Development Academy Newsletter, 10(1). Sugden, D., & Sugden, L. (1991). The assessment of movement skill problems in 7- and 9-year-old children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 329-345. Schoemaker, M. M., & Kalverboer, A. F. (1994). Social and affective problems of children who are clumsy: How early do they begin? Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11(2), 130-140. Sherrill, C. (1998). Adapted Physical Activity, Recreation and Sport : Crossdisciplinary and Lifespan. Madison, WI: Mc Graw-Hill. Smits-Engelaman, B. C., Henderson, S. E., & Michels, C. G. (1998). The assessment of children with developmental coordination disorders of the Netherlands: The relationship between the Movement Assessment Battery for Children and the Korperkoordinations Test fur Kinder. Human Movement Science, 17, 699-709. Tan, S. K., Parker, H. E., & Larkin, D. (2001). Concurrent validity of motor tests used to identify children with motor impairment. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 18(2), 168-182. Ulrich, D. A., & Ulrich, B. D. (1984). The objectives-based motor skill assessment instrument : Validation of instructional sensitivity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 175-179. Ulrich, B. A. (1985). Test of Gross Motor Development. Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Ulrich, B. A. (2000). Test of Gross Motor Development (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. World Health Organization. (1992). The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. Geneva: World Health Organization. Wilson, B. N., Kaplan, B. J., Crawford, S. G., Campbell, A., & Dewey, D. (2000). Reliability and validity of a parents questionnaire on childhood motor skills. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 484-493. Wright, H. C., Sugden, D. A., Ng, R., & Tan, J. (1994). Identification of children with movement problems in Singapore: Usefulness of the Movement ABC checklist. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11(2), 150-157. Wright, H. C., & Sugden, D. A. (1996). The nature of development coordination disorder : Inter- and intragroup differentces. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 13, 357-371. Waelvelde, H. V., Weerdt, W. D., Cock, P. D., & Smits-Engelaman, B. C. (2003). Ball catching. Can it be measured? Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 19, 259-267.
dc.subject粗動作發展測驗;發展協調障礙;兒童動作評量工具;信度;評分者間信度;評分者內信度
dc.subjectcorrelation;Movement ABC;TGMD-2;inter-rater reliability;DCD;ICCs;intra-rater reliability
dc.title兒童動作評量測驗工具與第二版粗動作發展測驗之信度研究
dc.titleReliability of Movement Assessment Battery for Children Test and Test of Gross Motor Development Second Edition
dc.typethesis
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
6105-08403401.pdf
Size:
229.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

學位論文(103學年度之前)