Publication: 2003年國際橄欖球比賽得分特徵之研究∼以澳洲、紐西蘭及南非之三國賽為例∼
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
中文摘要
本研究以2003年澳洲、紐西蘭及南非之三國賽,共六場次賽事之全部過程為研究對象,用事後回溯法記錄相關數據進行比較、分析,其目的為探討三國橄欖球比賽不同職司位置選手得分、不同分段時間得分、不同區域得分、不同方式得分及不同得分機會來源、得分前最後一次集團控球方式是否具有顯著差異水準。本研究資料處理,以單因子變異數(one- way ANOVA)分析進行考驗,並以α=.05考驗其顯著水準。
所得的結果如下:
一、不同位置得分有顯著差異存在,經事後比較發現接鋒得分顯著優於其他職司位置選手。
二、不同分段時間得分沒有顯著差異。
三、不同區域得分沒有顯著差異,然若以達陣、轉換射門、罰踢射門及落踢射門等個別項目來比較,就不難發現在達陣次數方面,左、中、右三個區域達陣次數分別為14、9、7次;在達陣且成功轉換射門方面,中間區域的達陣9次,轉換射門成功8次,不僅優於右邊區域的達陣7次,轉換射門成功4次,更遠遠超出左邊區域的達陣14次,轉換射門成功4次;另外在罰踢射門成功次數方面,也呈現中間區域多於左、右兩區域的結果。
四、不同方式得分次數的比較;達陣與落踢射門2種方式具有顯著差異;罰踢射門與轉換射門及落踢攻門等3種方式之間具有顯著差異;罰踢射門與達陣2種方式未達顯著差異。
五、不同得分機會來源得分次數沒有顯著差異。
六、得分前最後一次集團控球方式具有顯著差異,經事後比較發現Ruck與Maul、Scrum及Line Out等集團控球方式間有顯著差異,而Maul、Scrum及Line Out 等3種集團控球方式間沒有顯著差異。
ABSTRACT
This research focused on the 2003 Three Nations Rugby Match, including six matches. Correlating the results to obtained scoring by different positions, different time period, different sections, different ways , different resources , and finally to dominate the ball of different group before to get points. This research used “one-way ANOVA” and “α=.05” to operate. The results obtained as follows:
1.A notable difference was observed for scoring in different positions, the points which stand-off got were more than others.
2.About getting points at different time will not notable in the results of the games obviously.
3.Getting points on different sections was not notable . (Compared with Try, Conversion Goal, Penalty Goal, and Drop Goal to get points)It was easy for us to find out the times of try on the right, the middle, and the left, are fourteen, nine, and seven; nine try on the middle and eight successful conversion goals are not only superior to seven try on the right and four successful conversion goals but also fourteen try on the left and successful conversion goals; Additionally the successful penalty goals on the middle are more than the right and the left.
4.To compare with different ways to get points; the discrimination between try and drop goal was notable, and the differences among penalty goal ,conversion goal, and drop goal were also notable ;between penalty goal and try scoring was not notable .
5.About the resources of getting points was not notable .
6.After comparing , we find out within Ruck, Maul, Scrum, and Line Out those ways to dominate the ball were notable in the game, but among Mual, Scrum, and LineOut were not notable .
Description
校院名稱:國立臺灣體育學院
系所名稱:體育研究所
畢業學年度:92年
論文頁數:73頁