Options
軟式網球女子單打比賽得失分技術分析之研究~以2009年全國運動會女子單打16強賽為例~
THE RESEARCH ON SKILLS OF GETTING AND LOSING POINTS IN WOMEN’S SOFT TENNIS SINGLE MATCH—TAKING WOMEN’S SINGLE ROUND OF 16 IN 2009 NATIONAL ATHLETIC GAME AS AN EXAMPLE
Date Issued
2017-02-27T06:47:52Z
Date
2011
Advisor
趙榮瑞
Chao, Rong-Jui
Abstract
本研究旨在探討軟式網球女子單打前八強與後八強得分技術與失分技術之差異性,以2009年全國運動會女子單打16強19場比賽為樣本,經由現場錄影記錄方式,再轉換資料,以描述統計及無母數魏可遜二樣本檢定(Wilcoxon two-sample test)作分析,其結果如下:
一、前八強主要得分技術為發球(.75)與每局得分總數達顯著相關(p<.05),而後八強主要得分技術為正手拍(.84)與每局得分總數達顯著相關(p<.05),此為兩者顯著之差異。
二、前八強主要失分技術為接發球(.75)及正手拍(.82),兩項技術與每局失分總數達顯著相關(p<.05),而後八強主要失分技術為正手拍(.89)及反手截擊(.76),兩項技術與每局失分總數達顯著相關(p<.05),此為兩者顯著之差異。
三、在得分技術上只有接發球(.05)有顯著差異(p<.05),其中前八強選手高於後八強選手,而在前、後八強主要失分技術上失球總數與正手拍(.015)有顯著差異(p<.05),其中後八強選手高於前八強選手。
一、前八強主要得分技術為發球(.75)與每局得分總數達顯著相關(p<.05),而後八強主要得分技術為正手拍(.84)與每局得分總數達顯著相關(p<.05),此為兩者顯著之差異。
二、前八強主要失分技術為接發球(.75)及正手拍(.82),兩項技術與每局失分總數達顯著相關(p<.05),而後八強主要失分技術為正手拍(.89)及反手截擊(.76),兩項技術與每局失分總數達顯著相關(p<.05),此為兩者顯著之差異。
三、在得分技術上只有接發球(.05)有顯著差異(p<.05),其中前八強選手高於後八強選手,而在前、後八強主要失分技術上失球總數與正手拍(.015)有顯著差異(p<.05),其中後八強選手高於前八強選手。
The dissertation aimed to explore the differences of skills of getting and losing points in women’s soft tennis single, took 19 matches of women’s single top 16 in 2009 National Athletic Game as samples, adopted the way of live video recording to transform into data, and analyzed with descriptive statistics and non-parametric Wilcoxon two-sample test; the results are as follows:
1.Among top 16, the main skill of getting points of the first group of eight was serving (.75), and it was significantly correlated with the total getting points per game (p<.05); the major skill of getting points of the remaining eight was forehand (.84), and it was significantly correlated with the total getting points per game (p<.05); this was the conspicuous difference.
2.Among top 16, the main skills of losing points of the first group of eight were receiving a service (.75) and forehand (.82), and they were significantly correlated with the total losing points per game (p<.05); the major skills of losing points of the remaining eight were forehand (.89) and backhand volley (.76), and they were significantly correlated with the total losing points per game (p<.05); these were the conspicuous differences.
3.Among the skills of getting points of the first group of eight and the remaining eight, only receiving a service (.05) achieved significant difference (non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test p<.05), and for this skill, players of the first group of eight were higher than players of the remaining eight; among the major skills of losing points of the first group of eight and the remaining eight, total number of missing ball and forehand (.015) achieved significant difference (non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test p<.05), and in digit, players of the remaining eight were higher than players of the first group of eight.
1.Among top 16, the main skill of getting points of the first group of eight was serving (.75), and it was significantly correlated with the total getting points per game (p<.05); the major skill of getting points of the remaining eight was forehand (.84), and it was significantly correlated with the total getting points per game (p<.05); this was the conspicuous difference.
2.Among top 16, the main skills of losing points of the first group of eight were receiving a service (.75) and forehand (.82), and they were significantly correlated with the total losing points per game (p<.05); the major skills of losing points of the remaining eight were forehand (.89) and backhand volley (.76), and they were significantly correlated with the total losing points per game (p<.05); these were the conspicuous differences.
3.Among the skills of getting points of the first group of eight and the remaining eight, only receiving a service (.05) achieved significant difference (non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test p<.05), and for this skill, players of the first group of eight were higher than players of the remaining eight; among the major skills of losing points of the first group of eight and the remaining eight, total number of missing ball and forehand (.015) achieved significant difference (non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test p<.05), and in digit, players of the remaining eight were higher than players of the first group of eight.
Subjects
軟式網球;得分技術;失分技術
Soft tennis;skill of getting points;skill of losing points
Publisher
競技運動學系碩士班
Description
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立台灣體育大學
系所名稱:競技運動學系碩士班
學號:19704021
畢業學年度:99年
論文頁數:87頁
Type
thesis
File(s)
Loading...
Name
0000701.pdf
Size
9.4 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):120679c48d592e2ea6f8f0e642eb5a4a