Publication:

足球比賽中傳球技術之研究－以2011年亞足聯主席盃六強決賽為例－

本研究旨在探討足球比賽中傳球失誤、搶球及攔截的技術在比賽中的影響。透過比賽錄影及播放，從中紀錄被搶、攔截成功及傳球失誤的次數，藉由次數的分析歸納出優秀隊伍的比賽模式。研究利用SPSS統計程式，以描述性統計及配對t檢定( Paired t test) 的統計方法來檢定2011年亞足聯主席盃足球賽前六強隊伍各項數據上之差異情況。得知1.中場區域被搶次數為最多，以全部被搶次數分析顯示，在144次被搶次數中，縱向：中場區域>攻擊區域>防守區域。橫向：中間區域>左邊區域>右邊區域。2.以防守區域內攔截成功次數為最多，攻擊者在此區掌握控球權顯得較為困難，為了防止攻擊者靠近球門區域，防守線則更加嚴密。以全場攻擊攔截成功次數分析顯示，在407次攔截成功次數中，縱向：防守區域>中場區域>攻擊區域。橫向：中間區域>右邊區域>左邊區域。3.在防守區域傳球失誤次數為最多，當攻方攻擊至對方的防守區內，若稍有不慎或抗壓不足者，則會產生區域內傳球失誤。以全場傳球失誤次數分析顯示，在504次傳球失誤次數中，縱向：防守區域>中場區域>攻擊區域。橫向：中間區域>右邊區域>左邊區域。4.統計分析結果：(一)贏球隊伍與輸球隊伍分別在被搶、攔截成功及傳球失誤三項參數之變量統計，均無呈現顯著差異。(二)若將場項分開統計，只有中場區域在傳球失誤上之比較，顯著性為0.008，達到顯著差異。(三)在傳球失誤之下半場配對和被搶之左邊區域配對經檢定，兩組數據標準差(SD)相對於平均值太大，所以未達顯著差異。

This thesis aims at examining the effects of passing slip, deprivation and interception skill in soccer competitions. Through observation of the recorded competition films, the times of deprivation, successful interception and passing slip were set down and analyzed to conclude the competition mode of excellent teams. The SPSS program was used for statistical analysis, descriptive statistics and Paired t test to examine the difference of data between the first six teams of 2011 AFC President's Cup.The findings of the observation are as follow:

(1) According to the data of 144 times deprivation, balls were scrambled in the midfield for the most times. (Longitude: midfield> attack field>defense field. Transverse: midfield> left field> right field)

(2) The data of successful interception indicated that, in 407 times of intercepting successfully, balls were intercepted in the defense field most frequently. (Longitude: defense field> midfield> attack field. Transverse: midfield> right field> left field) It was more difficult for attackers to set the pace in this field; therefore, defenses were strengthened to avoid attackers approaching goal areas.

(3) The data of passing slip shows that, in 504 times of slips, passing slips happened in the defense field for the most number of times. (Longitude: defense field> midfield> attack field. Transverse: midfield> right field> left field transversely) Attackers who came in the competitors’ defense field couldn’t concentrate enough on the competition or bear the stress would slip in the field.

(4) The results of this study are as follow:

1. The differences of the data among the winners and the losers in deprivation, success interception and passing slip are not significant.

2. There is a significant difference in comparing passing slip of each match in midfield with a significant value of 0.008.

3. The verification of passing slip in second half of game and deprivation in left field represent that the difference is not significant since the SD score of the two groups is much more than the mean score.