Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
    Communities & Collections
    Research Outputs
    Fundings & Projects
    People
    Organizations
    Statistics
  • English
  • 中文
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. 學位論文(103學年度以前)
  3. 學位論文(103學年度之前)
  4. 懸吊核心運動介入對下背痛患者之成效探討
 
  • Details
Options

懸吊核心運動介入對下背痛患者之成效探討

THE EFFECT OF SLING CORE MUSCLES EXERCISE IN PATIENTS WITH LOW BACK PAIN

Date Issued
2017-02-27T06:36:38Z
Date
2010
Advisor
高明峰
Kao, Ming-Feng
URI
https://ir.ntus.edu.tw/handle/987654321/71005
Abstract
  本研究目的為藉著懸吊運動應用在健康及不同程度下背痛治療的效果。方法:受試者以16位女性(7位有下背痛和 9位健康者,進行8週懸吊運動,一週兩次,一次四十分鐘。)分健康組與下背痛組兩組。於訓練前後,針對受測者之軀幹肌耐力測試(一分鐘仰臥起坐、一分鐘俯臥舉體、靜態軀幹屈曲和靜態驅幹伸展)和疼痛指數與日常生活限制情形做測試。統計方法以描述性統計和混合設計二因子變異數分析考驗運動介入於訓練前後是否有差異,其顯著水準訂為α= .05。結果:兩組受測者在經8週懸吊核心運動後,其軀幹肌耐力皆有顯著增加(p<.05)但在健康(仰臥起坐18.89±13.36次 VS. 30.11 ±16.04次,俯臥舉體35.89±16.42次 VS. 58.67±21.95次,軀幹屈曲28.06±18.97秒 VS. 97.36±52.19秒,軀幹伸展46.32±32.68秒 VS. 102.81±31.28秒)和下背痛組間(仰臥起坐17.86± 14.58次 VS. 25.57±15.36次,俯臥舉體30.71±22.41次 VS. 44.14±21.27次,軀幹屈曲28.02±23.48秒 VS. 48.41±25.75,軀幹伸展42.87秒±33.48 VS. 100.56±54.11秒)比較,不管在前測、後測還是進步幅度皆無顯著差異。但下背痛組在疼痛方面(5.21±1.70分 VS. 2.71±1.91分)和日常生活限制方面(10.71 ± 5.71分 VS. 5.29±4.86分)皆有顯著改善。結論:經8週懸吊運動後,兩組受測者的軀幹肌耐力皆有顯著的進步,且下背痛患者也因為軀幹核心肌群肌耐力的增加,使得疼痛指數與日常生活限制下降。
  Objective:The purpose of the study was to investigate the efficacy of eight weeks sling core muscles exercise in patients with LBP and healthy people. Method:Sixteen people were recruited as subjects, include nine healthy people and seven LBP patients. All subjects underwent the following measurements:sit-ups, upper trunk lift, curl up and sorensen back extension test. LBP patients underwent the following measurements:pain score and daily life dysfunction . The data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and two-way ANOVA (α= .05) to examine any change after the exercise. Result:Significant improvements were shown among sixteen people in trunk muscle edurance (Healthy:sit-ups 17.86±14.58 VS. 25.57 ± 15.36, upper trunk lift 30.71±22.41 VS. 44.14± 21.27, curl up 28.02 ±23.48 VS. 48.41± 25.75, sorensen back extension test 42.87 ±33.48 VS. 100.56±54.11), (LBP:sit-ups 18.89±13.36 VS. 30.11 ± 16.04, upper trunk lift 35.89± 16.42 VS. 58.67±21.95, curl up 28.06±18.97 VS. 97.36± 52.19, sorensen back extension test 46.32±32.68 VS. 102.81±31.28) And significant improvements were shown among LBP patients in pain scores(5.21±1.70 VS. 2.71±1.91) and daily life dysfunction (10.71± 5.71 VS. 5.29 ±4.86). It was concluded that eight weeks sling exercise training was effective in LBP patients with decreased pain scores and daily life dysfunction. And it was also effective in every one with improve trunk muscle endurance.
Subjects
懸吊運動;核心肌群;下背痛;復健;運動治療
sling exercise;core muscles;low back pain
Publisher
體育研究所
Description
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立台灣體育大學
系所名稱:體育研究所
學號:19701002
畢業學年度:98年
論文頁數:94頁
Type
thesis
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

000009901.pdf

Size

863.06 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):02a88b6e8200d09badccfc733c742a00

Make it your own

DSpace-CRIS can be extensively configured to meet your needs. Decide which information need to be collected and available with fine-grained security. Start updating the theme to match your Institution's web identity.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback