Publication:

軟式網球女子雙打比賽前衛失分技術之研究-以2005年東亞運動會前八名選拔賽為例

本研究旨在探討軟式網球雙打比賽，前衛技術得分與失分技術及前衛得失分與勝負之關係，以2005年東亞運動會女子前八名選拔賽為研究對象，期能藉由統計方法獲得相關數據進行分析，所得資料以描述統計、t檢定分析等。獲研究結果如下：

一、在兩次國手選拔賽中，主要得分技術為正手截擊（﹤.049）正手高壓殺球（﹤.028）發球（﹤.014），均達顯著水準（P<.05），而主要失分技術各項次中均未達顯著水準，此為兩者顯著之差異。

二、在兩次國手選拔賽中，前四名正手截擊得分平均數最高為14.75，正手拍16.50，正手高壓殺球10.00為主要得分技術；後四名正手截擊平均數最高為5.50，正手拍12.33，正手高壓殺球4.67，前四名與後四名於正手拍擊技術與勝負成正相關。

三、在兩次國手選拔賽中，前四名正手拍失分平均數最高為14.25，正手截擊10.00，反手截擊7.25為主要失分技術；後四名正手拍平均數最高為12.33，反手拍7.67，反手截擊7.67，由於前四名與後四名反手拍擊技術失誤率明顯偏高，而造成勝負主要之關鍵。

This study aims to research on the soft tennis doubles game, the relationship between the forwards technology and the outcome of the game. A case study was focused on the former 8 players of team tryouts of the 2005 East Asian Game Competition Sports, and it was expected to obtain the corresponding data for analysis, and the data gained by descriptive statistics, T-test analysis, and so on. The results of this study are below:

1.In the two national team tryouts, the main set point technology was forehand cut (﹤.049) forehand overhead smash (<.028) service (<.014) were significant to meet the criteria (P<.05) and the main lost point technology on various games was significant not to reach to the criteria. This was the significant difference of these two technologies.

2.In the two national team tryouts, the average value of forehead cut of the former 4 players was 14.75, forehand stroke 16.50, forehand overhead smash 10.00 were the main set point technology; the average value of forehand stroke of the latter 4 players was 5.50, forehand cut 12.33, forehand overhead smash 4.67, and the technology of the forehand stroke of the former 4 players and the latter 4 players was positively correlated with the outcome.

3.In the national team tryouts, the average value of forehand stroke was 14.25, forehand cut 10.00, backhand cut 7.25 was the main lost point technology; the average value of forehand stroke of the latter 4 players was 12.33, backhand stroke 7.67, backhand cut 7.67. As the error rate of backhand stroke of the former 4 players and the latter 4 players was obviously high resulting in being a key of the main outcome.